search for: router2

...| > ----------------------+ > > | > > ((Internet)) > > | > > | > -----------------------+ > | | > | | > Win95 Win95 Win95 Router2 + Samba > > > Router1 is acting as a WINS server, and Router2 should be sending its > browse list to Router1. The Domain Master Browser (WinNT4.0) should be > acting as the master browser for both subnets. The WINS server should > add all of Router2's subnet to it's list...

For anyone to answer that clearly, we''d need a bit more information. Firstly, what is connected to router1 and router2? In other words, does the router box you want to use have enough ports (and of the right type) to actually handle all of the connections? Secondly, can we assume that you have enough access to the box you want to use to be able to install the software and configure it? (This may sound an obvious q...

Hello list, Here is a setup of my network: eth0 <-> router1 <-> eth2 --- wifi --- eth2 <-> router2 <-> eth0 | | eth1 eth1 Router1: eth0 - Internet connection eth1 - Local network (network 10.1.1.0/24) eth2 - Wireless AP (network 10.1.10.0/24) Router2: eth0 - Internet connection eth1 - Local...

...Router1 + Samba (WINS) | | | | ----------------------+ | ((Internet)) | | -----------------------+ | | | | Win95 Win95 Win95 Router2 + Samba Router1 is acting as a WINS server, and Router2 should be sending its browse list to Router1. The Domain Master Browser (WinNT4.0) should be acting as the master browser for both subnets. The WINS server should add all of Router2's subnet to it's list. All clients are configured t...

Hi, The network topo looks like this: the original network: router1 router2 | | |----------------OSPF------------| the target network: (we need to insert a transparent firewall between these 2 routers, so a proxy arp is set up on firewall to bridge router1 and router2) router1 firewall router2 |...

...his is a little off topic but this list is so helpful!! Is this the correct way to split our /24 block up? Tom suggested something like this in an earlier post but that did not work either. So what should I change to make this work? Internet<===Shorewall Box===>router1<++++T1 Line++++>router2<==LAN I need a /28 on the Shorewall side of things and the rest on the LAN side of things. So routing looks like this: Shorewall IP xxx.xxx.xx.1/28 route xxx.xxx.xxx.0/24 router1 IP (xxx.xxx.xxx.2) Router1 IP xxx.xxx.xxx.2/28 route xxx.xxx.xxx.0/24 to router2 IP (xxx.xxx.xxx.3) Router2 IP xx...

...I turn on the roadwarrior - everything goes crazy: packet loss becomes huge (90%) even for machines, which worked perfectly before, ping shows duplicate packets. When I turn off the roadwarrior again - everything returns to the working state. Router1 and Roadwarrior3 are using tinc 1.0.23 version. Router2 uses v1.0.19 because newer is not present in the repository :(. Here are the configs: hosts folders are exactly the same on all nodes: $ cat hosts/central_router Address = 88.77.66.55 -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- ... -----END RSA PUBLIC KEY----- $ cat hosts/karl_router TCPonly = yes -----BEG...

...ld. My policy file has this: loc net accept net loc accept So that the local zone has full Internet access. Where should I start looking to find the problem? The logs are not showing me anything that I can see. Also as a bonus question, I currently have: LAN<===>router1<--T1 Line-->router2<===>Shorewall<--->Internet LAN and router1 all have a 10.1.0.0/24 address router2 and the Shorewall local interface have a 10.0.0.0/24 address How should I split up my new public /24 block so that everything has a public IP? A lot of questions but any guidance would be very very helpf...

I have this kind of network: /==========\ /==========\ /==========\ | ROUTER 1 |---| FIREWALL |---| INTERNET | \==========/ \==========/ \==========/ | | /==========\ /==========\ | LAN | | ROUTER 2 | \==========/ \==========/ The firewall allows only ports 80 and 443 to the internet and 22 to the ROUTER 2. It also allows everything from ROUTER 2 to the

Thanks Jose, I found the key in the routing table of Router2; it had bad entries for the farest subnets (didn't have the 'via' commands...). Thanks for helping me. Now I'm gonna configure the network with IPv6 'cause I have to make it work with Mobile IPv6. Anybody working on these funny things can mail me, so we can suffer togheter!...

Hi, I am trying to set up a VPN that allows mobile users to access multcast information from an information vendor. Hence Tinc is configured as a switch. Internet --[ router1 ]------[eth0 VPN eth1]--------------[ router2 ]--------- mobile users VPN server is running Ubuntu 10.04 and is also configured as a dhcp server that hands out IP address to connecting mobile users. A bridge (br0) is statically set up at boot through the interfaces script. Its bridge port is eth0. br0 is assigned 10.10.145.254 in the 10.10.1...

...an help with this thread? My conf was based in http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt article CSD0101LNX00F:~# uname -a Linux CSD0101LNX00F 2.6.17-2006-12-08 #1 Fri Dec 8 14:09:37 BRT 2006 i686 GNU/Linux CSD0101LNX00F:~# cat /etc/iproute2/rt_tables 255 local 254 main 253 default 0 unspec 200 router1 201 router2 202 router3 CSD0101LNX00F:~# ip route 200.253.10.128/26 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 200.253.10.137 201.49.17.0/25 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 201.49.17.50 10.0.0.0/22 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.1 172.31.0.0/22 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 172....

Hi folks, I have 2 firewalls, setup with Centos 5.2. They are also routers, connected to 2 upstream routers. I have some cases where connections from servers to the internet leave my network via router2 and answers come back via router1. So I added conntrack tools to both routers/firewalls to synchronize the session tables (using ftfw procotol). That works as expected. If e.g. I ping from an inside server to somewhere outside, ICMP request leaves via router2, the answer comes back via router1...

Hi I set-up a gre tunnel between two linux boxes. A short diagram is like this lan1 -> router1 ----- router2 <- lan2 The tunnel works fine, i can ping from lan1 to lan2 but the problem is the speed between lan1 and lan2 is lower than it supposed to be If i log in to router1 and transfer something from router2 or lan2 it is working at maximum speed, 1024kbits/s. The problem is if i log in to a computer...

what is the limit on the arp cache entires ?! Does someone have very big LANs with linux-routers ? How big ? (i mean flat L2 network, not segmented) I want to know how much can my net can scale ? thanx _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

...from all fwmark 0x8 lookup balanceo2 32759: from all fwmark 0x7 lookup cablemodem3 32760: from all fwmark 0x5 lookup cablemodem 32761: from all fwmark 0x6 lookup cablemodem2 32762: from all fwmark 0x4 lookup balanceo 32763: from all fwmark 0x3 lookup router3 32764: from all fwmark 0x2 lookup router2 32765: from all fwmark 0x1 lookup router1 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default xerver:~# cat /etc/iproute2/rt_tables 255 local 254 main 253 default 0 unspec 200 balanceo2 201 balanceo 202 cablemodem 204 router1 205 router2 206 router3 207 cablemodem2 208 cablemodem3 Route...

...from all fwmark 0x8 lookup balanceo2 32759: from all fwmark 0x7 lookup cablemodem3 32760: from all fwmark 0x5 lookup cablemodem 32761: from all fwmark 0x6 lookup cablemodem2 32762: from all fwmark 0x4 lookup balanceo 32763: from all fwmark 0x3 lookup router3 32764: from all fwmark 0x2 lookup router2 32765: from all fwmark 0x1 lookup router1 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default xerver:~# cat /etc/iproute2/rt_tables 255 local 254 main 253 default 0 unspec 200 balanceo2 201 balanceo 202 cablemodem 204 router1 205 router2 206 router3 207 cablemodem2 208 cablemodem3 Route...

Hello, The setup is : Asterisk ------<www> ------- Router1---------<LAN> --------- SIP Phones | | |------------------<pstn>----------Router2------------| (I hope the sketch is understandable. If not, it could be summarized with : "SIP hardphones on a given LAN are connected to an Asterisk server through 2 different routers. one is connected to PSTN, the over to the www) For backup/failover puropose, is it easy to setup 2 seperate...

Hi all I have a problem splitting traffic behind 2 adsl. My situation: _________router2 | lan1 ------- fw ----------- router1 | lan2----------| lan1 use router1, lan2 router2. The linux default gw is set to router2, lan2 browse internet without any problem (icmp, tcp..). Lan1 is blocked. >From lan1 i can ping router1, and i''ve set this i...

Hi, With kernel 2.4 I was able to use equalize to send our outgoing packets to two different routers (our isp supports this setup), like this: ip route add default src ip.a.dd.rr equalize nexthop via <router1> weight 1 nexthop via <router2> weight 1 The two routes were used equally on a per packet basis, not per flow or per cached route, but per packet, each line has 800k upload and with that route we could upload to a single remote host at 1.6mbit. We replaced the server with a newer one and changed to 2.6 (2.6.20) kernel, I fo...