search for: router1

...CP/IP part is working great, no problems there. I am > running Samba on the routers.The network diagram looks roughly like > this: > > Santa Rosa (Local City): DMB > / > Win95 Win95 WinNT4.0 Router1 + Samba (WINS) > | | > | | > ----------------------+ > > | > > ((Internet)) > > | > > | > -----------------------+ > | | > |...

For anyone to answer that clearly, we''d need a bit more information. Firstly, what is connected to router1 and router2? In other words, does the router box you want to use have enough ports (and of the right type) to actually handle all of the connections? Secondly, can we assume that you have enough access to the box you want to use to be able to install the software and configure it? (This may sound...

Hello list, Here is a setup of my network: eth0 <-> router1 <-> eth2 --- wifi --- eth2 <-> router2 <-> eth0 | | eth1 eth1 Router1: eth0 - Internet connection eth1 - Local network (network 10.1.1.0/24) eth2 - Wireless AP (network 10.1.10.0/24)...

So this is a little off topic but this list is so helpful!! Is this the correct way to split our /24 block up? Tom suggested something like this in an earlier post but that did not work either. So what should I change to make this work? Internet<===Shorewall Box===>router1<++++T1 Line++++>router2<==LAN I need a /28 on the Shorewall side of things and the rest on the LAN side of things. So routing looks like this: Shorewall IP xxx.xxx.xx.1/28 route xxx.xxx.xxx.0/24 router1 IP (xxx.xxx.xxx.2) Router1 IP xxx.xxx.xxx.2/28 route xxx.xxx.xxx.0/24 to router2 IP...

...an communicate without a problem in any direction. When I turn on the roadwarrior - everything goes crazy: packet loss becomes huge (90%) even for machines, which worked perfectly before, ping shows duplicate packets. When I turn off the roadwarrior again - everything returns to the working state. Router1 and Roadwarrior3 are using tinc 1.0.23 version. Router2 uses v1.0.19 because newer is not present in the repository :(. Here are the configs: hosts folders are exactly the same on all nodes: $ cat hosts/central_router Address = 88.77.66.55 -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- ... -----END RSA PUBLIC K...

Hi, The network topo looks like this: the original network: router1 router2 | | |----------------OSPF------------| the target network: (we need to insert a transparent firewall between these 2 routers, so a proxy arp is set up on firewall to bridge router1 and router2) router1 firewall...

...an Francisco to via VPN. The TCP/IP part is working great, no problems there. I am running Samba on the routers.The network diagram looks roughly like this: Santa Rosa (Local City): DMB / Win95 Win95 WinNT4.0 Router1 + Samba (WINS) | | | | ----------------------+ | ((Internet)) | | -----------------------+ | | | | Win95 Win95 Win95 Router2 + Sa...

Hi all I have a problem splitting traffic behind 2 adsl. My situation: _________router2 | lan1 ------- fw ----------- router1 | lan2----------| lan1 use router1, lan2 router2. The linux default gw is set to router2, lan2 browse internet without any problem (icmp, tcp..). Lan1 is blocked. >From lan1 i can ping router1, and i''ve set this iproute rules: ip route add 10.0.0.0/24 dev dmz0 table...

I have this kind of network: /==========\ /==========\ /==========\ | ROUTER 1 |---| FIREWALL |---| INTERNET | \==========/ \==========/ \==========/ | | /==========\ /==========\ | LAN | | ROUTER 2 | \==========/ \==========/ The firewall allows only ports 80 and 443 to the internet and 22 to the ROUTER 2. It also allows everything from ROUTER 2 to the

...browse and ping as it should. My policy file has this: loc net accept net loc accept So that the local zone has full Internet access. Where should I start looking to find the problem? The logs are not showing me anything that I can see. Also as a bonus question, I currently have: LAN<===>router1<--T1 Line-->router2<===>Shorewall<--->Internet LAN and router1 all have a 10.1.0.0/24 address router2 and the Shorewall local interface have a 10.0.0.0/24 address How should I split up my new public /24 block so that everything has a public IP? A lot of questions but any guidanc...

...net | router0 192.168.0.1 | | 192.168.0.100 +-----<eth0>----+ | | | Workstation | | | +-----<eth1>----+ 192.168.1.100 | | 192.168.1.1 router1 | +-----------> to internet I want to control which traffic to/from processes running on the workstation uses which interface (i.e. outbound path to internet) on a process-by-process basis, without the cooperation of the program (i.e. rather than having the program bind...

Hi folks, I have 2 firewalls, setup with Centos 5.2. They are also routers, connected to 2 upstream routers. I have some cases where connections from servers to the internet leave my network via router2 and answers come back via router1. So I added conntrack tools to both routers/firewalls to synchronize the session tables (using ftfw procotol). That works as expected. If e.g. I ping from an inside server to somewhere outside, ICMP request leaves via router2, the answer comes back via router1. conntrack -e on router1 shows th...

...lman.ds9a.nl Cc: Oggetto: Re: [LARTC] Routing problem On Wednesday, 20 November 2002, at 18:31:42 +0100, Mauro Cerboni wrote: > I have 3 routers (Linux boxes with Red Hat 8.0 server), with iproute2 and ip_forward activated; they are linked together in this way: > > AP1------Router1---------Router2----------Router3---------AP2 > > The routing tables seem correct. > But the symptoms you describe seem to tell the opposite :-( > Router1 and Router3 can ping each other, > Router1 and Router2 share a network segment, as well as Router2 and Router3. So as Ro...

what is the limit on the arp cache entires ?! Does someone have very big LANs with linux-routers ? How big ? (i mean flat L2 network, not segmented) I want to know how much can my net can scale ? thanx _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

...e. Someone can help with this thread? My conf was based in http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt article CSD0101LNX00F:~# uname -a Linux CSD0101LNX00F 2.6.17-2006-12-08 #1 Fri Dec 8 14:09:37 BRT 2006 i686 GNU/Linux CSD0101LNX00F:~# cat /etc/iproute2/rt_tables 255 local 254 main 253 default 0 unspec 200 router1 201 router2 202 router3 CSD0101LNX00F:~# ip route 200.253.10.128/26 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 200.253.10.137 201.49.17.0/25 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 201.49.17.50 10.0.0.0/22 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.1 172.31.0.0/22 dev eth2 proto kernel scope li...

...g an asterisk server. We are experiencing troubles due to very complicated environment. Shorewall is running on the same box than asterisk with dual NIC, server also as several services running on it like ntp, https or dhcpd Two network : 10.200.229.0/255.255.255.0 and 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 Router1 : 10.200.229.1 IP phones : 10.200.229.20 - 10.200.229.29 Computers : 10.200.229.30 - 10.200.229.40 Shorewall : 10.200.229.10 (eth0) and 192.168.0.10 (eth1) Asterisk ip : 10.200.229.10 DSL modem : 192.168.0.254 All web traffic for asterisk /shorewall server (http, ftp, dns, ...) shou...

...: from all fwmark 0x7 lookup cablemodem3 32760: from all fwmark 0x5 lookup cablemodem 32761: from all fwmark 0x6 lookup cablemodem2 32762: from all fwmark 0x4 lookup balanceo 32763: from all fwmark 0x3 lookup router3 32764: from all fwmark 0x2 lookup router2 32765: from all fwmark 0x1 lookup router1 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default xerver:~# cat /etc/iproute2/rt_tables 255 local 254 main 253 default 0 unspec 200 balanceo2 201 balanceo 202 cablemodem 204 router1 205 router2 206 router3 207 cablemodem2 208 cablemodem3 Routes declarations: ip route add default via...

...: from all fwmark 0x7 lookup cablemodem3 32760: from all fwmark 0x5 lookup cablemodem 32761: from all fwmark 0x6 lookup cablemodem2 32762: from all fwmark 0x4 lookup balanceo 32763: from all fwmark 0x3 lookup router3 32764: from all fwmark 0x2 lookup router2 32765: from all fwmark 0x1 lookup router1 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default xerver:~# cat /etc/iproute2/rt_tables 255 local 254 main 253 default 0 unspec 200 balanceo2 201 balanceo 202 cablemodem 204 router1 205 router2 206 router3 207 cablemodem2 208 cablemodem3 Routes declarations: ip route add default via 1...

...(E.g. connected to the same switch.) I noticed, that those nodes do never talk directly to each other via their private ip-addresses, but instead use the NATed address they got from the router. Furthermore, some talk only over a third node, that sits outside the LAN. ====Example ==== Router1 : Public IP 1.1.1.1 Local LAN behind said router Subnet 192.168.0.x/24 Tinc-VPN : Subnet 172.25.3.0/24 Node1 Behind Router1 NAT-UDP 1...

Hello, The setup is : Asterisk ------<www> ------- Router1---------<LAN> --------- SIP Phones | | |------------------<pstn>----------Router2------------| (I hope the sketch is understandable. If not, it could be summarized with : "SIP hardphones on a given LAN are connected to a...