search for: routeabl

hi: Just a litle update: 41/8 allocated to AfriNIC (APR 2005). 73/8 allocated to ARIN (MAR 2005). hope it helps.

...have an Asterisk box behind a NAT address and also a Xlite 4 soft phone behind a different NAT network. Asterisk -> Nat -> Internet -> Nat -> Softphone. I can register my softphone to the asterisk box ok via SIP but the RTP stream from the asterisk box is addressed to the private non-routeable address of the softphone when I turn on rtp debuging. How can I configure the rtp stream to be sent to the public facing address of the softphone? Cheers, Richard. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-user...

Hi, I have a question. I have a routeable /24 netblock including a server at a colocation and I would like to use tincd to tunnel part of that netblock to an internal network on another location being connected to the internet via gateway with DSL link and a single static IP address, so I can use public routable IP addresses on the local...

...nough information. I''m running shorewall version 1.4.8. On Fedora core 1. Coming into my location I have a T1. I have 5 internet routable IP''s. I''m currently using one as my default internet connection. My ISP''s router is actually assigned all of my internet routeable IP''s and they forward the traffic to in internal ethernet segment. On this segment i have my firewall. The firewall has 3 interfaces. eth0 is internal lan, eth1 ISP lan, eth2 ISP lan. I have one internet routable ip going to eth1 and a second going to eth2. Everything is working prop...

...over Ethernet as EtherType 0x0842" > > > The keyword being 'typically', but what is it that ether-wake actually > uses/does? (I need to forward a WOL packet to a different > > vlan on some Cisco hardware, between two Centos machines). > WoL packets are not routeable/forwardable. They are Layer 2 broadcast packets that contain the MAC address of the machine that needs to be woken up. But since you quoted the Wikipedia article on WoL you would know that and it specifically says what the magic packet is and does. The format of the packet is unimportant, all tha...

...kground as other issues arise. Here is the situation: I have two dual-homed kvm hosts both running CentOS-6.7 and identically configured. These are connected to the same LAN segment via br0/eth0 and to each other via a cross-over cable on br1/eth1. The IPv4 assigned to br0 on both is a publicly routeable address. The IPv4 assigned to br1 on both is a private address in the 192.168.0.0/16 address space. The guests on each host have their virtual eth0 bridged with their host's br0 and eth1 bridged with their host's br1. The addresses used by the guests on eth0 are publicly routeable, the...

I''m beginning to think again about what will be different in 2.0. Here are some thoughts. a) User-defined actions will be emphasized. - A library of actions will be available with names such as: AcceptSSH AcceptDNS DropWindows (drops all SMB noise) DropBroadcasts (Silently drop all Broadcast traffic) ... The possibilities are nearly endless but should

Scenario: FreeBSD box running IPFW acting as a gateway to private network. The private network is made up of entirely routeable IP addresses. External users running Win2k and XP on DSL connections with dynamic IPs. Goal: To have the FreeBSD gateway securely authenticate and encrypt the traffic between the outside users and the internal network. I've spent the last 3 days running up and down Google and reading any...

Hi everybody, I am testing Optipoint 400 Standard SIP (Firmware 2.3.14) with Asterisk. It is posible to dial from another Phone (x-lite) to the Optipoint, but when I try to dial from the Optipoint there is no dialtone and there is only a short beep when I dial Numbers. The Optipoint shows "no Server..." (Registrar?) in Display. Sip debug shows no unusual (to me) Messages. Sip show

CentOS-6.6 We have a host that has multiple IPv4 addresses aliased to eth0. The primary address is 216.185.71.x and the alias is 192.168.6.x. This host connects to devices on both netblocks without problems. Only default routing is used and it looks like this: #ip route 192.168.6.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.6.x 216.185.71.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src

On 07/28/2015 01:46 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > Future concern is IPv6 stuff, now that Xfinity has forcibly changed > their hardware to include full IPv6 support. I have no idea if this is > NAT'd or rolling IPs or what. All of the routers I've seen merely firewall inbound traffic, allowing none. There's no need for NAT or rolling IPs.

...0x0842" >> >> >> The keyword being 'typically', but what is it that ether-wake actually >> uses/does? (I need to forward a WOL packet to a different >> >> vlan on some Cisco hardware, between two Centos machines). >> > WoL packets are not routeable/forwardable. They are Layer 2 broadcast > packets that contain the MAC address of the machine that needs to be > woken up. But since you quoted the Wikipedia article on WoL you would > know that and it specifically says what the magic packet is and does. > > The format of the packet...

Hi all, Information on this topic seems a little scarce, so I thought I'd try the list.... Apart from the the coolness factor can anyone explain to me in what situation one would use TDMoE rather than IAX for communication betwwen 2 Asterisk servers?

...t <-> 2 x SIP endpoints With directmedia=no I can make a call between the two SIP endpoints; the RTP stream being passed through the Asterisk box. Obviously, this is sub-optimal. I attempted to enable bridging of the call between the 2 endpoints directly, given that they are on the same non-routeable private net. With directmedia=nonat, I see Asterisk report the bridging of the calls but both sides of the call are routed to the originating endpoint so effectively, the call becomes an echo-loop. There is no audio on the second end-point although the call remains up. I assume this is some sort...

On Wednesday 07 May 2003 22:21, Michael Collette wrote: > Scenario: > FreeBSD box running IPFW acting as a gateway to private network. The > private network is made up of entirely routeable IP addresses. External > users running Win2k and XP on DSL connections with dynamic IPs. > > Goal: > To have the FreeBSD gateway securely authenticate and encrypt the traffic > between the outside users and the internal network. You might try mpd, which should let the Windows...

Hi, Most networks are using either 10.x.x.x or 172.x.x.x or 192.168.x.x , but was curious If I can use the range 223.255.255.x for my backbone routing, this looks like a nice block to use as most ppl don''t use this, specially if you build quite a big intranet what about the whole 223.x.x.x block, will this be used on the internet? sorry if its a stupid questions Thanks Sew

Hi James, Simply remove the GATEWAY line from the eth0:192 interface config :D Then you'll had only one default gateway. And the source IP to all unknown address will be the routeable one. Att., Antonio. ----- "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> escreveu: > De: "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> > Para: centos at centos.org > Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 18 de Fevereiro de 2015 15:39:16 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected...

The WoL magic packet is only scanned for the string above, and not actually parsed by a full protocol stack, it could be sent as any network- and transport-layer protocol, although it is typically sent as a UDP <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_Datagram_Protocol> datagram <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datagram> to port <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP_and_UDP_port> 0,]

I will shortly spend a bit of time tracking down the breakage more closely, but my 9-Stable system of June 22 runs fine. After an update on about July 10, I noted that it would hang after Xorg was started, but usually worked. After an upgrade to July 18, my system could no longer start Gnome. It would start Xorg and Gnome would start normally, getting many apps started, but about 10 seconds after

We've got Samba 2.2.2 up and running fine on an RS/6000 (AIX) machine w/ NT authentication. We have one domain w/ multiple subnets, and need users on these different subnets to have access to the shares on this machine. We've tested from a different subnet than the one we originally ran smbpasswd on, and it fails (prompting for the passwd to the share...when it works fine from the