search for: rounting

Hello List We are trying to redirect calls directly, instead of opening a new channel and dialing out. Etc: A calls B on our asterisk, and is directly redirected to C We have been told that this feature should be available on a PRI level, and is called Partial re-routing. Anybody has an idea of whether this is supported in Asterisk? Kind Regards Jon Sch?pzinsky Detele. No virus found in

Hello everyone, I''ve recently switched from CakePHP to rails. In CakePHP there is a feature called admin routing where your route would look like: /admin/controller/action/ which would map to a method admin_action() in the specified controller. Is something like this available in Rails as well or would I always have to create a separate controller? thanks for your help Marc

+reid, +llvmdev, -llvm-commits > On 2014-Jul-30, at 11:56, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> I think the fix is to upgrade old-style global arrays (or reject >> them?) in the .ll parser. >> > > The .ll format is not stable, so you should be able to just reject it. Looking a little deeper, it's not

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > Looking a little deeper, it's not "old-style" exactly; rejecting this > > isn't trivial. > > > > - According to LangRef, the third field is optional [1]. > > > > [1]: > http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#the-llvm-global-ctors-global-variable

...re will be able to shed some light on my doubts. I have set up a firewall using kernel 2.6.15 (Debian) that does NAT for 100 clients, and uses two different ISPs, using the howto found at http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html. I have *not* patched my kernel. The rounting setup is taken from the howto, and it basically works, I see packets flowing out of both WAN interfaces, and everyting seems to work properly for packets that are generated from the firewall itself. I have set up NAT rules in postrouting table, this way: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $WAN...

...ne that need to be able to map a share on a server that is outside its own domain. We can ping the other server but can not map to the share. Windows 2000 is able to map to this share but 95 and 98 can not. Is there a setting within samba that we need to set in order set the rounting so that we can map to this drive or is the problem with 95 and 98. Hope all this makes sense and thanks for any help. Steve

> On 2014-Jul-30, at 18:05, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > >> On 2014-Jul-30, at 17:19, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Looking a little deeper, it's not "old-style" exactly; rejecting this

Hi to the ML. I''m new to VLAN configuration, and combining it to XEN is a bit difficult. I want to use VLAN because it''s possible to "arping" from a domU to an other, and VLAN looks like; the only solution to prevent that. May be I''m wrong if someone got a solution, I may be interrested. I''ve also tryed ebtables, but nothing to prevent arp