search for: round_robin

...tion.. My misdn.conf : [general] debug=4 append_digits2exten=yes stop_tone_after_first_digit=yes bridging=yes use_callingpres=yes presentation=allowed diaplan=0 [default] context=default language=fr nationalprefix=0 internationalprefix=00 rxgain=0 txgain=0 [TEports] context=isdn-incoming method=round_robin ports=2,7,8 callgroup=1 msns=5500,5501,5502,5503,5504,1812,1813,1814,1815,1816,5606,5607,5608 [NTports] context=pbx-incoming method=round_robin ports=3,4,6 callgroup=2 Have you got any idea ? Thank you for your help. Seb,

Ok ive been trying to get this to work for about half a year now. Ive searched all over the internet for a solution for my problem. Ive found some solutions, but they only led me to yet more problems. What we want to do is the following: I live in a student complex with 7 other people. Every room has its own internet connection from the same ISP. Ip, gateway, subnet are asigned through dhcp on

...PROCEEDING), ; this requests additional Infos, so we can waitfordigits ; without much issues. This works only for PTP Ports ; ; default value: no ; need_more_infos=no ; set the method to use for channel selection: ; standard - always choose the first free channel with the lowest number ; round_robin - use the round robin algorithm to select a channel. use this ; if you want to balance your load. ; ; default value: standard ; method=standard ; ; dialplan means Type Of Number in ISDN Terms (for outgoing calls) ; ; dialplan options: ; ; 0 - unknown ; 1 - International ; 2 - Nati...

...ustomization point. It’s > not always so simple. > I agree. When I designed this logic, this point in particular was a bit problematic. I have been thinking the same; it would be nice if scheduler resource were able to specify how units are dynamically selected. We could still have a default round_robin strategy in the absence of extra information. This is definitely something that we should be looking into as a future development. If you agree, at least to start, we could use the roundrobin strategy. > <snip> > > > Load/Store Unit and Memory Consistency Model > ------------...

> On Mar 1, 2018, at 9:22 AM, Andrea Di Biagio <andrea.dibiagio at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > At Sony we developed an LLVM based performance analysis tool named llvm-mca. We > currently use it internally to statically measure the performance of code, and > to help triage potential problems with target scheduling models. We decided to > post this RFC because

Hi all, At Sony we developed an LLVM based performance analysis tool named llvm-mca. We currently use it internally to statically measure the performance of code, and to help triage potential problems with target scheduling models. We decided to post this RFC because we are interested in the feedback from the community, and we also believe that other people might be interested in a tool like