Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "roud".
Did you mean:
road
2009 Feb 27
3
rounding problem
hi i am creating some variables from same data, but somewhere is different
rouding.
look:
P = abs(fft(d.zlato)/480)^2
hladane= sort(P,decreasing=T)[1:10]/480
pozicia=c(0,0,0,0,0)
for (j in 1:5){ for (i in 2:239){
if (P[i]/480==hladane[2*j-1]){pozicia[j]=i-1}}}
period=479/pozicia
> P[2]/334
[1] 0.0001279107
> hladane[1]
[1] 0.0001279107
> P[2]/334...
2012 Jan 11
6
Generating unque patient IDs
Dear group,
I am trying to prepare a NONMEM friendly dataset for population PK
analysis. My patient IDs are 10 digit long and NONMEM is losing precison
and rouding the last couple of digits. I need to generate unique Patient
IDs fromt he current 10-digit IDs. Ihave total 250 subjects so I
appreciate if anybody can suggest me a way to code this in R.
Regards,
Ayyappa
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2017 Nov 14
2
ldb*, -H, multiple source?
There's some sintyax available to use, with ldb* tools, multiple
''server'', eg use multiple '-H', or write server in a roud-robin
style?
Thanks.
--
dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66
Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/
Polo FVG - Via della Bontà , 7 - 33078 - San Vito al Tagliamento (PN)
marco.gaiarin(at)lanostrafamiglia.it t +39-0434-...
2016 Jul 24
2
[Question] Multichannel load-balancing algorithm
Hello,
I have a question about multichannel and the load-balancing algorithm.
What kind of algorithm is it? (Roud-robin, dynamic round-robin, ...)
What are the arguments the algorithm compute to load-balance the
network traffic on the interfaces?
I already know that if a 10Gb/s interface and a 1Gb/s interfaces are
in the multichannel connection the 1Gb/s one will be ignored until the
10Gb/s goes down. But the...
2017 Nov 20
2
ldb*, -H, multiple source?
Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba
In chel di` si favelave...
> > There's some sintyax available to use, with ldb* tools, multiple
> > ''server'', eg use multiple '-H', or write server in a roud-robin
> > style?
> No, there is no way built into samba-tool to do what you are asking,
> you will have to script something around samba-tool, something like
> this:
...mmmhhhhh... i'm also considering coding some ''script'' around this,
but this can be considere...
2003 Jun 18
1
Oops more testing was required....
...ten every time. As the kernel has to
+ * round small waits up to guarantee that we actually wait at least
+ * the requested number of microseconds, this can become grossly
+ * inaccurate. We therefore keep a cumulating number of microseconds
+ * to wait, and only actually perform the sleep when the rouding
+ * becomes insignificant. (less than 10%) -- REW.
**/
static void sleep_for_bwlimit(int bytes_written)
{
struct timeval tv;
+ static int time_to_sleep = 0;
if (!bwlimit)
return;
@@ -427,9 +436,13 @@
assert(bytes_written > 0);
assert(bwlimit > 0);
- tv.tv_usec = bytes_...
2003 Jun 18
0
bwlimit patch.
...ten every time. As the kernel has to
+ * round small waits up to guarantee that we actually wait at least
+ * the requested number of microseconds, this can become grossly
+ * inaccurate. We therefore keep a cumulating number of microseconds
+ * to wait, and only actually perform the sleep when the rouding
+ * becomes insignificant. (less than 10%) -- REW.
**/
static void sleep_for_bwlimit(int bytes_written)
{
struct timeval tv;
+ static int time_to_sleep = 0;
if (!bwlimit)
return;
@@ -427,9 +436,12 @@
assert(bytes_written > 0);
assert(bwlimit > 0);
- tv.tv_usec = bytes_...
2009 Feb 27
3
ietf discussion about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex
...llot/2837/
As I understand:
we need to change "mode" definition to be ONLY a list of comma separated
values. This is because order of several modes has no importance
according to another rfc about SDP...
We need a few adjustment:
* cng and vbr should be optionnal to folow.
* ptime rouding text is not well understood
* it should be specified that the code is only defined for mono.
* ..
Also, we need to know why there is a "license" chapter (chapter 9)
and we need to remove it because ietf don't like it...
Probably a little more...
Aymeric
> Jean-Marc
>
>...
2009 Feb 27
5
ietf discussion about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex
Hi Jean-Marc, Alfred and Greg,
Are you receiving the mails from IETF about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex
The mails are not coming from AVT mailing list, but I think we are
all 3 part of a minimal list (draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex at tools.ietf.org)
dedicated to latest discussion about the draft.
I have answered some questions, but there are small changes and adaptation
still required to the ietf