search for: rothe

I've attached a patch relative to OpenSSH 2.5.1p1 which sets the default PAM service name to __progname instead of the hard-coded value "sshd". This allows you to have multiple invokations of sshd under different names, each with its own PAM configuration. Please let me know if you have any questions or problems. -- Mark D. Roth <roth at feep.net> http://www.feep.net/~roth/

Hi Duncan, It doesn't appear to be what I'm looking for as there is copying of the old stack to the new stack. Additionally, according to the LLVM docs on segmented stacks (http://llvm.org/releases/3.0/docs/SegmentedStacks.html) the stacklings are allocated memory from the heap. Since this places them all on the same memory segment, a read/write from one stackling could technically

Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/05/2017 10:17 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Albert McCann wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of m.roth at 5- >>>> cent.us >>>> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2017 10:58 AM >>>> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>

Hi Brent, You're correct. The segmented stack model is intended for performance, not security. Its goal is to allow lightweight threads to be very cheaply allocated and destroyed. For your model, you would most likely want to use different address spaces for the different memory types. Currently, clang does not allow you to define the address space of variables with automatic storage

I've attached a patch for openssh-SNAP-20001028 which fixes the following two problems: 1) I fixed fixpaths to complain instead of failing silently if it can't write the output file. 2) I changed log-server.c to use av0 as the first argument to openlog(). I also made sure it called openlog() before the TCP wrapper stuff, because libwrap calls syslog() and winds up using the

Updating a system from CentOS 5.4 (current) to 5.5, and I see: libsepol.scope_copy_callback: zosremote: Duplicate declaration in module: type/attribute zos_remote_t libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages failed semodule: Failed! Any ideas as to what's going on, or why? mark "glad selinux is disabled on that box"

grep face /home/<username> -r :) -- David Fix Senior Systems Administrator Mr. X Inc. ----- Original Message ----- From: "m roth" <m.roth at 5-cent.us> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 9:01:27 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] gdm-simple-greeter config? > Greetings, > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at

Hi Duncan, Are the segmented stacks actually on separate memory segments? My intended purpose for placing different datatypes on separate stacks is such that memory accesses to one datatype won't be allowed to overflow to another datatype. If they aren't, in fact, on separate memory segments, are you aware of a way to place a non-readable/-writable segment in between two other stack

> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 13:43:00 +0000 > From: "Vanhorn, Mike" <michael.vanhorn at wright.edu> > > On 4/27/16, 9:39 AM, "centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of > m.roth at 5-cent.us" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of > m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> And now, I just >> ssh'd in from another windows, same

Either CentOS 6 or 7 - anyone know if it's possible? Upper Management has decided on a policy that IMAP is going to go away in the near future, and they want everyone on Lookout, sorry, Outlook 365. mark, VMNH* * Very Much Not Happy

Hi Brent, On 03/06/13 14:32, Brent Gregory Roth wrote: > Hi Duncan, > > Are the segmented stacks actually on separate memory segments? My intended > purpose for placing different datatypes on separate stacks is such that memory > accesses to one datatype won't be allowed to overflow to another datatype. > > If they aren't, in fact, on separate memory segments, are you

Hi all, I''m getting my feet wet in the infiniband lake and of course I run into some problems. It would seem I got the compilation part of sles11 kernel 2.6.27 + Lustre 1.8.3 + ofed 1.4.2 right, because it allows me to see and use the infiniband fabric, and because ko2iblnd loads without any complaints. In /etc/modprobe.d/lustre (this is a Debian system, hence this subdir of

Ok, where/how do I submit this to the CentOS project? Here's a complete script - anyone, *please* feel free to test it, and let me know if I've missed anything. Thanks in advance. mark #!/bin/bash # ################################### # Author: mark roth # Date: 30 Apr. 2010 # Purpose: to create a working, bootable CentOS install on a USB key

can someone confirm this: http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29 Authentication refused: realpath /home/user/.ssh/authorized_keys failed: The file access permissions do not allow the specified action.

This is seriously weird... note the date I made the original post.... Nux! wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "m roth" <m.roth at 5-cent.us> >> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> >> Sent: Friday, 23 September, 2016 20:50:53 > >> Either CentOS 6 or 7 - anyone know if it's possible? >> >>

We don't have enough arguments here.... <g> I see that thunderbird's deprecated for RHEL 7, and they recommend evolution. I've certainly had some annoyances in the last couple-three years with t-bird. So, what are people's preferred mail tools, other than t-bird (or maybe mutt or pine.... <g>)? mark

None of the previous kernels will boot properly. On Monday, July 3, 2017 5:58 AM, "m.roth at 5-cent.us" <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: Chris Olson wrote: <snip> > I went on vacation right after an update to one of our virtual CentOS 6.9 > systems so it was not restarted for a period of time.? Now it will not > complete boot-up with the gnome display never

So, on my old Netbook, now happily running C6.9, I'm looking for opinions for a lightweight window manager. Gnome surely ain't it.... Years back, I used to like IceWM, but not sure it's been kept up. So, opinions? mark

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 12/15/2015 11:26 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Really? There's no systemd target to restart it, and graphical.target >> doesn't do it? Um..... > > Why do you think that? Sorry, I would have thought that graphical.target would do it. And suppose I'm using kdm...? mark > > # systemctl status gdm.service > gdm.service -

> Am 17.11.2017 um 17:36 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: > > wwp wrote: >> On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:34:53 -0500 Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: >> >>> On 2017-11-17 10:16 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>> I can't seem to find apcupsd for C 6. Just went to epel's website, and >>> not >>>> visible. Anyone have a clue?