search for: ror32

...t;>16)) : __L16(_x)) - void __dummy__(void) { OFFSET(UREGS_r15, struct cpu_user_regs, r15); diff --git a/xen/include/xen/bitops.h b/xen/include/xen/bitops.h index 190d96b..c6a78b6 100644 --- a/xen/include/xen/bitops.h +++ b/xen/include/xen/bitops.h @@ -175,4 +175,11 @@ static inline __u32 ror32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift) return (word >> shift) | (word << (32 - shift)); } +/* base-2 logarithm */ +#define __L2(_x) (((_x) & 0x00000002) ? 1 : 0) +#define __L4(_x) (((_x) & 0x0000000c) ? ( 2 + __L2( (_x)>> 2)) : __L2( _x)) +#define __L8(_x) (((_x) &am...

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Cameron McInally <cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu> wrote: > Andy, > > Here is the left circular shift operator patch. I apologize to the reviewer > in advance. The patch has a good bit of fine detail. Any > comments/criticisms? > > Some caveats... > > 1) This is just the bare minimum needed to make the left circular shift > operator

Andy, Here is the left circular shift operator patch. I apologize to the reviewer in advance. The patch has a good bit of fine detail. Any comments/criticisms? Some caveats... 1) This is just the bare minimum needed to make the left circular shift operator work (e.g. no instruction combining). 2) I tried my best to select operator names in the existing style; please feel free to change them as

Since the vTPM implementations are being incorproated into Xen and possibly upstream Linux, I would like to see if this protocol change could be added before we have significant legacy implementations. If not, I still think it would be useful as either a v2 or negotiated protocol change. The current vTPM protocol is a copy of the network protocol. This was likely done for ease of implementation,

This round implements all of the review comments from V2 and all patches are now acked. Unless there are any objections I intend to apply later this morning. Ian.