search for: romney

...to discover that you''ve made an ass of yourself. Got it? Good! Apologies to everyone. Apparently when I updated the plugin and re-ran rake backgroundrb:setup it did not overwrite my old version of the start script with the new, correct one already in trunk. -- Best Regards, Christian Romney -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/backgroundrb-devel/attachments/20061016/3923eb11/attachment-0001.html

...16 However, I'm not sure if these results are valid, since my raw data is already in frequencies, not in counts. When I used Sum as the dependent variable, I obtained different results. I am at a loss on how to proceed. If anyone has any ideas, they would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Romney [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi all, I realize this behavior is by design, and in some respects the right thing to do. It also pre-dates the addition of Enumerable#count. I''m wondering, however, if it''s possible/desirable to allow the caller to access the Enumerable versions under certain conditions. I originally wrote the up as an issue, but was informed this would be the better venue. I''m

I have a very strange problem here. I do not get this. So any help is greatly appreciated. Basically I have a model that calls a method in the background process in the "after_save" method. Let''s call the model products. So what happens is this: 1. I create a new product. 2. Everything works and the product is saved with id 13. 3. A method is called in my background

...the whole start script will change soon when the new version using slave comes out, so I''m not sure it''ll do anyone much good. Regardless, passing it on for good karma. This patch was created against the current rev (as of this writing), which is 47. -- Best Regards, Christian Romney http://www.xml-blog.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/backgroundrb-devel/attachments/20061016/a7cda523/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fixed_singleto...

We've got a white route w/ VSNL. $0.09 / min, billing is 1/1 prepaid only. SIP or H323 w/ G729 Codec. E-mail me off-list for testing. Thanks, Jon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Romney" <Jerry@uspcom.com> To: <daniel.silaro@gmail.com>; <asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com>; <asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com>; <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 1:44 PM Subject: [asterisk-biz] India Routes > > Anybody got India Routes...

...hould be allowed To: noreply at rubyforge.org Feature Requests item #5856, was opened at 2006-09-22 17:03 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=7480&aid=5856&group_id=1917 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Christian Romney (xmlblog) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Stubbing of private methods should be allowed Initial Comment: I have a private method in my Rails controller that does some processing. Based on the return value of this method, a particular action decides what to do. I do not want to make this method...

Hi all, I saw a mention of a 3rd party git plugin in a previous post, but have been unable to locate it anywhere. Anybody know where I can find it? TIA, Christian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-users/attachments/20071110/48fda7ab/attachment.html