search for: romanova

...e Win98 boxes in our network. Now I'm trying to do the same for the Win2k boxes, but no luck. The details: 1. The server's name is curia and the Win2k box's is macellus. I created (with vipw) usernames for curia$ and macellus$. 2. net rpc join -U root%password worked ok, joined domain ROMANOVA. 3. Next, added curia and macellus with smbpasswd -a -m. 4. On Win2k I use the Network Identification Wizard. In the first screen, I enter user root and domain ROMANOVA. It goes to another screen with the message "Windows cannot find an account for your computer on the ROMANOVA domain"...

See attached some quick slides (backup from the dev meeting talk) about the pass pipeline. -- Mehdi Le mer. 11 avr. 2018 à 12:18, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> a écrit : > > > Le mer. 11 avr. 2018 à 11:20, <katya.romanova at sony.com> a écrit : > >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 10, 2018 11:53 PM >> *To:* Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com> >> *Cc:* David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com&g...

From: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 11:53 PM To: Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com> Cc: David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>; Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] exploring possibilities for unifying ThinLTO and FullLTO frontend + initial optimization pip...

...). I’m not aware of any other stakeholders in legacy C API other than Sony and Apple. Peter, are you OK with our decision? If everyone agrees, I will implement an “easy” fix. Please let me know. Katya. From: Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 11:20 AM To: Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com> Cc: Steven Wu <stevenwu at apple.com>; Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com>; Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com>; Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>; Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org>; Reid Kleckn...

...y C LTO API to do what new C++ LTO API is doing (which I suspect will much more work). I appreciate your and Steven’s feedback/comments/advice that could help me to do this decision. Thank you! Katya. From: Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 6:10 PM To: Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com> Cc: Steven Wu <stevenwu at apple.com>; Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com>; Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com>; Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>; Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org>; Reid Kleckn...

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 7:34 PM, <katya.romanova at sony.com> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > > > Thank you for the clarification J. > > > > I’m sure you have a very good understanding of how much efforts it will > take to write a patch for legacy C LTO to implement caching the same way > it’s done in new C++ LTO API....

...benefits of the new LTO API and why it’s important/beneficial to finish this before starting to work on unifying Thin/FullLTO pipeline? Thank you! Katya. From: Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 6:55 AM To: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> Cc: Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com>; David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] exploring possibilities for unifying ThinLTO and FullLTO frontend + initial optimization pipeline On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Mehdi AM...

Le mer. 11 avr. 2018 à 11:20, <katya.romanova at sony.com> a écrit : > > > > > *From:* Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 10, 2018 11:53 PM > *To:* Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com> > *Cc:* David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>; Teresa Johnson < > tejohns...

...O groups will become permeable in one direction). However, do you think by doing this, we will achieve a better performance than doing ThinLTO backend for all of the files (a.o, b.o, c.o)? Thank you! Katya. From: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 5:25 PM To: Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com> Cc: David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>; Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] exploring possibilities for unifying ThinLTO and FullLTO frontend + initial optimization pip...

Le mar. 10 avr. 2018 à 23:18, <katya.romanova at sony.com> a écrit : > Hi Mehdi, > > > > Awesome! It’s a very clear design. The only question left is which > pipeline to choose for unified compile-phase optimization pipeline. > > - ThinLTO compile-phase pipeline? It might very negatively affect > compile-t...

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Le mar. 10 avr. 2018 à 23:18, <katya.romanova at sony.com> a écrit : > >> Hi Mehdi, >> >> >> >> Awesome! It’s a very clear design. The only question left is which >> pipeline to choose for unified compile-phase optimization pipeline. >> >> - ThinLTO compile-phase pipeline? It might v...

Hello, I have several low priority UBSan questions... (1) Is there a way for UBSan to print its output to a file that the user specified (e.g. via option) instead of dumping everything on stderr? (2) Out of curiosity, why is the name of the option for printing the stacktrace spelled "UBSAN_OPTIONS=print_stacktrace=1", though the allowed value is 1? Since the only one value is

> On Mar 26, 2018, at 6:03 PM, katya.romanova at sony.com wrote: > > Hi Steven, > Look at my replies inline (below your comments). > Katya. > > From: stevenwu at apple.com <mailto:stevenwu at apple.com> <stevenwu at apple.com <mailto:stevenwu at apple.com>> > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 4:46 PM &gt...

Hi Steven, Look at my replies inline (below your comments). Katya. From: stevenwu at apple.com <stevenwu at apple.com> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 4:46 PM To: Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com> Cc: Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com>; Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com>; Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>; Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk>; Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org>; Reid...

...possible to > perform name anonymous globals pass and compute summaries on the fly, which > should allow to perform ThinLTO at link phase. > > > > Katya. > > > > *From:* David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 10, 2018 7:38 AM > *To:* Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com>; Teresa Johnson < > tejohnson at google.com> > *Cc:* llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] exploring possibilities for unifying ThinLTO > and FullLTO frontend + initial optimization pipeline > > > > Hi Katya, &...

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:03 PM, <katya.romanova at sony.com> wrote: > Hi Steven, > > Look at my replies inline (below your comments). > > Katya. > > > > *From:* stevenwu at apple.com <stevenwu at apple.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, March 22, 2018 4:46 PM > *To:* Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com...

...tc). I think so. My understanding that for FullLTO files, it’s possible to perform name anonymous globals pass and compute summaries on the fly, which should allow to perform ThinLTO at link phase. Katya. From: David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 7:38 AM To: Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com>; Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] exploring possibilities for unifying ThinLTO and FullLTO frontend + initial optimization pipeline Hi Katya, [+Teresa since this is about ThinLTO & s...

Is there a reason why the alignment of the .text section should be 4 when we are optimizing for size (-Os or -Oz)? Note that when are optimizing for size, the symbols inside .text section don't have any alignment constraints. Alignment=4 for .text with the unaligned symbols inside this section prevent our linker from de-duplicating functions. Could the alignment of the .text section be

From: stevenwu at apple.com <stevenwu at apple.com> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 11:58 PM To: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> Cc: Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com>; Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com>; Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>; Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk>; Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org>; Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>; bd1976llvm at gmail...

...case they must actually > build the graph and prune all unreachable code. > > > All of these problems seem surmountable, but in aggregate, they make > me strongly doubt that the benefit is worth the cost. > > -Chandler > > > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Romanova, Katya > <Katya_Romanova at playstation.sony.com > <mailto:Katya_Romanova at playstation.sony.com>> wrote: > > Hello, > > I encountered a problem triggered by Jump-Threading optimization. > This pass is creating an unreachable block with an instructio...