search for: robinsomm

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Robin Sommer <robinsommer at web.de> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 22:56 -0800, I wrote: > >> the LLVM documentation lists the 'appending' linkage for having the >> linker combine two arrays. I'm wondering though if it's then >> possible to get the size of the combined ar...

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Robin Sommer <robinsommer at web.de> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 22:56 -0800, I wrote: >> >>> the LLVM documentation lists the 'appending' linkage for having the >>> linker combine two arrays. I'm wondering though if it's then >>> possible to get the...

Hello all, I've run into a problem with returning a struct on Linux x86. Consider the following two pieces of code: # cat a.ll declare { i32, i32 } @foo(i32, i32, i32) define void @do_foo() { call { i32, i32 } @foo(i32 1, i32 2, i32 3) ret void } # cat b.c #include <stdio.h> #include <stdint.h> extern void

Hi all, the LLVM documentation lists the 'appending' linkage for having the linker combine two arrays. I'm wondering though if it's then possible to get the size of the combined array, e.g., for iterating over its elements? Or how would I otherwise use the combined array? Thanks, Robin -- Robin Sommer * Phone +1 (510) 666-2886 * robin at icir.org ICSI/LBNL * Fax +1

On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 22:56 -0800, I wrote: > the LLVM documentation lists the 'appending' linkage for having the > linker combine two arrays. I'm wondering though if it's then > possible to get the size of the combined array, e.g., for iterating > over its elements? Or how would I otherwise use the combined array? Any thoughts on this? Am I missing something?

I'd like to represent strings "Pascal-style" with a length field followed by the actual bytes. Reading the reference manual, I think using a zero-length array should work in a struct like this: { i32, [0 x int8] } However, I get a problem with referencing constants. The following code doesn't compie: @foo = constant { i32, [3 x i8] } { i32 3, [3 x i8]

Sorry for the spam, but we're looking for a postdoc with compiler expertise, and in particular LLVM, for ICSI's networking group. I thought this list might have somebody interested in such a position: http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/about/netjob.html Feel free to forward further. Thanks, Robin -- Robin Sommer * Phone +1 (510) 722-6541 * robin at icsi.berkeley.edu ICSI/LBNL *

It seems that llvm-ld is stripping debugging symbols even with optimizations disabled: > cat main.c int main() { int a = 42; return a; } > clang -c -g -emit-llvm -o main.bc main.c > llvm-ld -disable-opt -b=a.out.bc main.bc > clang -g a.out.bc -o a.out >gdb a.out [...] (gdb) break main Breakpoint 1 at 0x40045b: