search for: rmprepusb

I was trying to set up a USB stick with syslinux.exe, on a XP machine. Had the following problems: 1. Tried: 1.1 from XP native cmd shell: E:\>syslinux\syslinux.exe --directory /syslinux --install --force --mbr --active e: 1.2 and a similar command from cygwin. where e: is the USB stick. With cygwin I got a segmentation fault. With XP

Oh somehow I never noticed that "bootsecfile" option. That's probably what I need to use. I was looking at the source to see how the --mbr flag works and thought that there should be a way to do the same thing with the other mbr files. On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:41 AM poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: > On 04.08.2016 00:58, Erik Sandberg via Syslinux wrote: >

Hi, ? I tried to use the syslinux.exe (version 4.04)?to make my usb drive bootable. When i run the syslinux.exe with the respective options I get this error ? "Accessing physical drive: The request is not supported. Did not successfully update the MBR; continuing..." ? I have administrator privilege and I started cmd prompt with "Run as Administrator" option too. I tried the

Hi, I am trying to create a bootable linux usb drive using syslinux command as given below but I am getting error as given below syslinux4.exe -maf G: Return code : 1 Output : Error : Could not write the whole boot sector I have tried to do this with syslinux4, syslinux5, syslinux6 with the same error message. The usb drive is formatted to FAT32 drive system and has a capacity of 4GB. The OS

...t; > than one partition in USB removable flash drives). > > Even more reason to give them an example with mkdiskimage > which can be executed more or less blindly. Examples are very welcome and very needed. But, I don't get it. A Windows user would look for: _ RUFUS (and site) _ rmprepusb (and site) _ 911cd.net _ reboot.pro _ user-friendly partitioning tools (and there are a lot) _ more alternatives that I am probably forgetting at this moment. And there are tools dedicated to build a (multi)boot USB drive starting from ISO images; just that those tools rely on a correct partitio...

Hi, Ady wrote: > I personally don't like this "hiding" [of CHS], but I understand > their reasons to do so. > > I think that the "USB-Geometry" section in the wiki should try to > point to the same kind of users. But it is in wiki page Hardware_Compatibility. Check out the neighborhood. If there is a place to - for once - state how a "normal"