search for: rmosek

Naras, Thanks. I'm a bit confused, because Rmosek does not declare Matrix as a dependency: > tools::package_dependencies("Rmosek", which = "all")[[1L]] [1] "pkgbuild" nor does it contain code needing compilation: > packageDescription("Rmosek", fields="NeedsCompilation")...

Package Rmosek compiles fine using Matrix versions 1.6.2- but not with anything beyond Matrix 1.6.2.? (FYI, Rmosek provides R interfaces to the excellent MOSEK solver; academic licenses are free.) Here is the error message: rmsk_obj_matrices.cc:50:9: error: use of undeclared identifier 'Matrix_isclass...

...RAN. However, I?m not sure what to do about the following from R CMD check ?as-cran on the current R-devel: Strong dependencies not in mainstream repositories: pogs * checking package namespace information ... OK * checking package dependencies ... ERROR Packages required but not available: 'Rmosek' 'reliaR' ?pogs' pogs is available here: http://foges.github.io/pogs/ref/admm Rmosek seems to be back on CRAN but perhaps not happily on osx reliaR seems to be on CRAN All three of these packages appear on the imports line of my DESCRIPTION file. Could someone clue me in on what...

...ent of Economics vox: 217-333-4558 University of Illinois fax: 217-244-6678 Urbana, IL 61801 > On Aug 14, 2017, at 8:36 PM, Richard M. Heiberger <rmh at temple.edu> wrote: > > Your example is not easily reproducible. > The REBayes requires Rmosek which requires a system command MOSEK. > Please try again with an example using data in base R. > > Meanwhile, my guess is that you will need to do something like > explicitly specifying xlim and ylim so all panels have the same > limits. > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:41 PM,...

...QcVRg_Lqu-ndCdVhO-r1LJsRQGuA%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=octave-dev If this is the wrong place to discuss this issue, I would be thankful for a redirection to the appropriate forum. As Henrik says, R or some organisation that acts in R's name, has accepted his non-free plugin: http://rmosek.r-forge.r-project.org/ Yes, it is non-free, even if it's LGPL, because it's linking to both R and MOSEK, which is a GPL+proprietary whole. There is no actual GPL violation because it's avoiding binary distribution. However, I'm concerned with the overall message this sends. I was...

I am trying to do some comparisons of density estimators using lattice. The code below attempts to plot the same histogram in each panel and then overplots a kernel estimate with different bandwidths. Finding packet.number() was a bit arduous, but seems to do what I want. My concern now is that close examination of the 4 histograms reveals that they are different even though they use the same

CRAN (and crantastic) updates this week New packages ------------ * disclapmix (0.1) Maintainer: Mikkel Meyer Andersen Author(s): Mikkel Meyer Andersen and Poul Svante Eriksen License: GPL-2 http://crantastic.org/packages/disclapmix disclapmix makes inference in a mixture of Discrete Laplace distributions using the EM algorithm. * EstSimPDMP (1.1) Maintainer: Unknown Author(s):