search for: rmeyer

Unbelievable! These guys get more and more disgusting each day. But now I have a proof that Linux and all its free software community (samba included) are indeed growing and are indeed consideder a threat by M$. Expect more and dirtier moves. Can you guys point me to more material on the subject? []'s, Juan > From: "Le Quellec, Francis" <FLeQuell@Teknor.com> > >

> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 12:52:21 -0700 > From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com> > To: eknuds@extremenetworks.com > Cc: "samba@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au" <samba@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au> > Subject: Re: Linux smbfs 2.0.29... > Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970813125221.009e0a70@pop.mhsc.com> > > At 04:45 AM 8/14/97 +0000, you wrote: >...

I've installed Samba ("latest") on SCO's openserver 5 with a WIN'95 hanging off of it as a client. I can run every test in DIAGNOSI.txt except for number 2. That is, the WIN'95 box can not ping the SCO box within a reasonable amount of time. (SCO can ping the WIN'95 box fine). For the longest time I thought the WIN'95 box couldn't ping the SCO box but I

hi out there, first of all: samba is pretty cool! question: is there a way to synchronize the clock of my linux box to a win95 box (something like 'smbnet time \\win95 /set /yes')? cheers jodok ;----------------------------------- Jodok Sutterluety Austria, Vienna Tel: ++43 1 4080791 email: js@bonus.unterland.at ;-----------------------------------

We fixed our own problem. Turns out that server taber is at service pack 1 and hyde is at service pack 3. In service pack 3 the smb redirector doesn't send unencrypted passwords without a registry entry to enable them. See article Q166730 at www.microsoft.com for details. This brings up another question. Is anyone out there using Samba with the encrypted passwords from NT 4? Ed Maple UNIX

...g entries which are entered on one workstation do not show when accessed from the other workstation. Known problem, Intuit does NOT support LAN sharing of Quicken Data files. _________________________________________________ Roeland M.J. Meyer (RM993) e-mail: rmeyer@mhsc.com web pages: http://www.mhsc.com/~rmeyer _________________________________________________

I am using samba-1.9.16p11 and have not been able to make browsing work from my 9.04 HP where it is on a switched ethernet segement alone. I have tried many combinations including remote announce to networks as well as Our NT Domain Server/ Win Servers. All to no avail. I am sure there is some key point I am missing. In fact my clients have to have DNS turned on in addition to WINS in order to

Hello, I have red the E-mail from Christophe Dumont from 17 Mar 1997We have a similar problem. In our smb.conf we have the entries: [global] hosts allow = 193.174.234., 192.124.248., 193.174.235., 141.35.191.122 workgroup = IMBNET printing = SYSV printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/yppasswd share modes = yes browseable = yes ....

I am getting a complaint that my Samba server running on Solaris 2.5 cannot be found from a user's PC running NT Workstation 4.0. Any suggestions? thanks, garrett curtis garrettc@eos.net

Hi folks, I have a curious problem when executing self extracting zip files from a samba share. Everything does work, but it is very very slow. Copying the .exe onto local disk (from the samba share) takes no time at all (500kb/sec). I would say it takes about 10 times as long to unzip when run directly from the samba share. This happens will all self-extracting exe files, and also from any share

Hello! I have a problem with samba. I run the freebsd samba-des port (samba-des-1.9.17.4) in a pretty much vanilla setting; home dir, a few shared dirs, no printing (yet). The problem is performance. While Samba is not terribly slow it's still too slow. Copying large files takes about half a minute/meg on an Ethernet LAN with no other activity. Trying to read a file using netscape

Hi all, We (the Samba Team) need some feed back from our user community. Anyone want to help out? All you need to do is post us a one liner. Tell us if you want 8 character length limited print share names or larger. If you really must have longer print share names - then how many characters? Should we limit the length? Background: >From time to time we receive patches to increase the maximum

...get through. I am posting the header information such that better analysts than myself may draw their own conclusions. >Return-Path: samba@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au >Received: from arvidsjaur (root@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au [150.203.160.29]) by mhsc.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA31896 for <rmeyer@mhsc.com>; Sat, 2 Aug 1997 08:47:40 -0700 >Received: from server@localhost (port 55895 [127.0.0.1]) by arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au with SMTP id <65320-29307>; Sun, 3 Aug 1997 00:53:11 +0000 >Message-Id: <199708021503.XAA09749@inet.hkg.com> >Errors-To: listproc-errors@arvidsjaur.an...

...e: PDC ability > by Gerald Carter <cartegw@Eng.Auburn.EDU> > 5) Hybrid configuration > by gtroup@rfs.com.au > 6) Re: semaphores and Solaris 7 8/99 > by Todd Pfaff <pfaff@edge.cis.mcmaster.ca> > 7) RE: PDC ability > by "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com> > 8) Corrupted files with applications using Samba/NetaTalk-Server > by Lars Martin <lars@softwarebuero.de> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 10:06:44 -0400 > From: Edward Schernau &l...

...1 16:16:21 pamperito tinc.vpn[17311]: Bogus data received from isivpn (168.226.139.225 port 2381) nov 11 16:17:08 pamperito tinc.vpn[17311]: Bogus data received from isivpn (168.226.139.225 port 2386) Nov 11 16:49:02 pamperito exiscanv2[31949]: 1CSKwD-0000SI-00 F:<tinc-bounces@tinc-vpn.org> T:rmeyer@idr.org.ar R:clean, marked for dequeue nov 11 17:05:41 pamperito tinc.vpn[17311]: Bogus data received from isivpn (168.226.140.12 port 3110) ------------ próxima parte ------------ nov 11 16:12:38 isidorito tinc.vpn[5841]: Sending meta data to pamvpn (200.x.x.x port 655) failed: Recurso no disponi...

Hello to the list, It seems that we have a leak. Someone is posting SPAM on this list. Since the headers are not being propogated we can not really tell where it's comming from. I would suggest that we not respond by quoting the FULL TEXT from the SPAM, however. This seems counter-productive, unless we LIKE repeating the SPAMers message for them. I would think that someone, in an EDU, would

I didn't saw my e-mail in the list, so I must suppose it never reached destination. Sorry if it's a 'd?j? vu' ;-) --- Jason and Guus: It finally worked! Thank you very much for your help. I think I know where the problem was. Can we change the name of the connection ('company' in the example of the manual) after we generate the keys? I changed it last week, do the

Hello all, Some may find this redundant, but this addresses a lot of qustions that I've been seeing, in the last few months, that were not dealt with, in the whole. In this message, I am addressing only capabilities, not specific HOW-TOs. It's more of a WHAT-IT-CAN-DO with a hint of WHY-YOU-WOULD-WANT-TO. In the near view, treat this as a features test report. SUMMARY: The questions were

Hi: First of all, thanks for this great piece of software! I found very clear the presentation sheets used at Linux Expo, Amsterdam. :-) About my problem, I setup everything to connect our two boxes. If I type 'ifconfig' I can see them up. Also the routes. ISIvirtual - Our firewall (iptables) which connects to the Internet through ADSL with a public dynamic IP. (the SSL client)

Hi. As I wrote some days ago (It worked! [Was: my two hosts don't see each other]) I succeeded at setting up a tinc VPN between two hosts (isivirtual and pamvirtual) I tried to ping from pamvirtual, the external machine, to an internal IP of 'isivirtual' but it doesn't work. Neither 'traceroute'. What's going on? At 'isivirtual' routing (ip forwarding) is