search for: rmdynam

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "rmdynam".

Did you mean: dynam
2019 Nov 15
3
RFC: token arguments and operand bundles
...that to get translated to something like this (after SROA cleanup): define double @foo(double %A, double %B, double %C) { %orig.rm = call i32 @fegetround() %ignored = call i32 @fesetround(i32 3072) %tmp = call double @llvm.experimental.constrained.fadd(double %A, double %B) [ “fpround”(token rmDynamic), “fpexcept”(token rmStrict) ] %ignored = call i32 @fesetround(i32 %orig.rm) %result = call double @llvm.experimental.constrained.fadd(double %tmp, double %C) [ “fpround”(token rmDynamic), “fpexcept”(token rmStrict) ] } Notice here the literal constant that C defines is still used for the ca...
2019 Nov 14
3
RFC: token arguments and operand bundles
...mean what the arguments currently mean. If not, the default assumption is allowed. A typical call to a constrained intrinsic would look like this: %sum = call double @llvm.experimental2.constrained.fadd(double %x, double %y) [ “fpround”(token rmDynamic), “fpexcept”(token ebStrict) ] Does that seem like a valid use of tokens and operand bundles? Does it seem better than the current approach? Thanks, Andy _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing...
2019 Nov 14
7
RFC: token arguments and operand bundles
...the arguments currently mean. If not, the default assumption is allowed. A typical call to a constrained intrinsic would look like this: %sum = call double @llvm.experimental2.constrained.fadd(double %x, double %y) [ "fpround"(token rmDynamic), "fpexcept"(token ebStrict) ] Does that seem like a valid use of tokens and operand bundles? Does it seem better than the current approach? Thanks, Andy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was...