search for: rm_

On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 5:53 PM <luke-tierney at uiowa.edu> wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Jun 2020, peter dalgaard wrote: > > > So this wasn't tested for a month? > > > > Anyways, Free() is just free() with a check that we're not freeing a null pointer, followed by setting the pointer to NULL. At that point of tcltk.c, we have > > > > for (objc = i = 0;

...cular do not use free or strdup with it." >> >> I think the reason is that R uses dlmalloc for Calloc on Windows: >> https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/c634fec5214e73747b44d7c0e6f047fefe44667d/src/main/memory.c#L94-L103 > > But that section #defines calloc and free to Rm_... counterparts in lockstep? (I assume that is where dlmalloc comes in?) > > Anyways, does it actually work to change free() to Free()? If so, then all this post mortem analysis is rather a moot point. > > -pd > > -- Luke Tierney Ralph E. Wareham Professor of Mathematical Scienc...

...gt; malloc: in particular do not use free or strdup with it." > > I think the reason is that R uses dlmalloc for Calloc on Windows: > https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/c634fec5214e73747b44d7c0e6f047fefe44667d/src/main/memory.c#L94-L103 But that section #defines calloc and free to Rm_... counterparts in lockstep? (I assume that is where dlmalloc comes in?) Anyways, does it actually work to change free() to Free()? If so, then all this post mortem analysis is rather a moot point. -pd -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plad...

Ah, I see it now: The remapping of free() to Rm_free() and calloc() to Rm_calloc() happens in memory.c, but not in tcltk.c; the macro Calloc in R_ext/RS.h maps to a call to R_chk_alloc which is defined in memory.h; RS.h is included in tcltk.c, so tcltk.c winds up calling Rm_calloc() via Calloc(), but then the NON-remapped free(), and the walls co...

...3WC527(n+)5`_<@NXJ?$pgsiO2+&3?QTLpF3UckI}q z`x<124wxnr+*}~sD-<&bj0=;Klhpu%JJD`u6B$IQtX6yW><N9>)6;`if~)b%Y%glp z!58`Y`9AWSARFg)CNVQgX=!Pgp}TkQj=301rtZ;TAc&Gdr{S|~pxcIU?GVi^WkKc^ z2xjXc<d_Ez9B8mCt4}shmSSZvdwYAsfWZ5uWG5y%`(bTAYypt$)%&5cf^<`TqFhHy z4q78SI~!3Q9XFj?rM_ at 0X5s$OHO0lne?{~_kzy`izTCdh-vp9r47c~Whry{;wiDdC zKRkdpp=xSs$|8Da*slaiGH$r#F0xMGHlu7cn)@<t#48*rrTd|`92<#QSy>%2fVuK7 zng3SXY}~TYVx8fpn=&&gUN%PEcm_Mjh#;M4Iqi<SHJp^D8#+U7P43;hw~_xA<p>5+ zEmZ07 at Nli{AuRV{Zd{YTYLR;=QU8)aCpBUhJ<%QW-yMw1%*;M)NXzg46<`2a|Dl%- SVlR;Z0000&lt...

Howdy. I feel like I am missing something really simply with regards to the way that Puppet works and I am wondering if someone can point me in the write direction. I have written a class that downloads, uncompresses, compiles, and installs Python from source. So far so good. The problem is that it only needs to do this once, when Python is not already in place (or some other custom

Package: logcheck-database,sendmail-base Version: logcheck-database/1.2.69 Version: sendmail-base/8.14.3-9 Severity: serious User: treinen at debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2009-08-18 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the