search for: rleid

...adds a class that works only (or mostly) with tidyverse verbs, that's very easy to dismiss it as an inclusion in base R. * summarize is an alternative to aggregate, that would be very confusing to have both Now to be fair to your argument we could think of other functions such as data.table::rleid() which I believe base R misses deeply, and there is nothing wrong with packaged functions making their way to base R. Maybe there's an existing list of criteria for inclusion, in base R but if not I can make one up for the sake of this discussion :) : * 1) the functionality should not already...

...s, >> that's very easy to dismiss it as an inclusion in base R. >> >> * summarize is an alternative to aggregate, that would be very confusing to >> have both >> >> Now to be fair to your argument we could think of other functions such as >> data.table::rleid() which I believe base R misses deeply, >> and there is nothing wrong with packaged functions making their way to base >> R. >> >> Maybe there's an existing list of criteria for inclusion, in base R but if >> not I can make one up for the sake of this discussion :)...

...>> that's very easy to dismiss it as an inclusion in base R. >> >> * summarize is an alternative to aggregate, that would be very confusing to >> have both >> >> Now to be fair to your argument we could think of other functions such as >> data.table::rleid() which I believe base R misses deeply, >> and there is nothing wrong with packaged functions making their way to base >> R. >> >> Maybe there's an existing list of criteria for inclusion, in base R but if >> not I can make one up for the sake of this discussion :...

On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 17:15, Hugh Marera <hugh.marera at gmail.com> wrote: > > How is your argument different to, say, "Should dplyr or data.table be > part of base R as they are the most popular data science packages and they > are used by a large number of users?" Two packages with many features, dozens of functions and under heavy development to fix bugs, add new

...mostly) with tidyverse verbs, > that's very easy to dismiss it as an inclusion in base R. > > * summarize is an alternative to aggregate, that would be very confusing to > have both > > Now to be fair to your argument we could think of other functions such as > data.table::rleid() which I believe base R misses deeply, > and there is nothing wrong with packaged functions making their way to base > R. > > Maybe there's an existing list of criteria for inclusion, in base R but if > not I can make one up for the sake of this discussion :) : > * 1) the fun...

...ery easy to dismiss it as an inclusion in base R. >>> >>> * summarize is an alternative to aggregate, that would be very confusing to >>> have both >>> >>> Now to be fair to your argument we could think of other functions such as >>> data.table::rleid() which I believe base R misses deeply, >>> and there is nothing wrong with packaged functions making their way to base >>> R. >>> >>> Maybe there's an existing list of criteria for inclusion, in base R but if >>> not I can make one up for the sake o...

...that's very easy to dismiss it as an inclusion in base R. > > > > * summarize is an alternative to aggregate, that would be very confusing > to > > have both > > > > Now to be fair to your argument we could think of other functions such as > > data.table::rleid() which I believe base R misses deeply, > > and there is nothing wrong with packaged functions making their way to > base > > R. > > > > Maybe there's an existing list of criteria for inclusion, in base R but > if > > not I can make one up for the sake of thi...

...ery easy to dismiss it as an inclusion in base R. >>> >>> * summarize is an alternative to aggregate, that would be very confusing to >>> have both >>> >>> Now to be fair to your argument we could think of other functions such as >>> data.table::rleid() which I believe base R misses deeply, >>> and there is nothing wrong with packaged functions making their way to base >>> R. >>> >>> Maybe there's an existing list of criteria for inclusion, in base R but if >>> not I can make one up for the sake o...