search for: rlb

I was hoping someone might be able to tell me the current status of direct rendering support? Is it possible to run Xen on a machine and have X DRI (Direct Rendering) work in at least one of the domains? Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...modifications notmuch makes are to change maildir flags. Would locking dovecot-uidlist.lock be sufficient, perhaps via liblockfile? Also, is there some reliable way to detect a dovecot Maildir? For example, are any of the dovecot-* files guaranteed to exist all the time? Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

software download: http://www.rlb.hu/download.php?id=1 [Image: http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/2057/kpernykp.png ] can i run under wine?

...s well, but I haven't managed to think of a way to implement a common solution. Also, I could imagine that this solution for rsync might be somewhat difficult to implement (perhaps complicated by symlinks, etc.), but it's the best thing I've thought of so far. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

...E}|e?4???VB?J?SK[??p>??-?4?????????b??Q????Bf>??e<???8????*?3#??|V??(]????k??P?."?q???-*VDW???%???S2??<T@y ???P?Q[^&%????B?????1M ?[?hF |?+?@?K?q)?g~??#?<?SU 1 ???06DF ?gLa`f???d??J%?1(X2?)???w??+??]- F%?* ?5a^_T??????&?-fh)? ??_QeH???X?? d??#? K?W??gj|>F?Kl???$(?iw??RLB???(m????kL? .?x????+?Y? j??`f??dbyxhvjH=?x??427?f???8<?X4_?Ht??@\???{ ????@??}h?i?FX??????f??????CcQd1????~?????_G? K/z&*?? ?Q~?Q??vA????I??? ah%;D????(CZ?*G?l-??0*e4?g??D??????V?y??Y??S???????X|{& .??|>,E???n?????? Tk?S??!-????V-? ,??.?=Y??,???P?f??;???\????\9? ?Tp?h,?????? )?-???&...

> You found it. The SHL32 (not SHR32) line fixes the problem. It must be > doing a 16-bit shift, then extending the result (which is reasonable). As > it happens, that it the same macro which gave us trouble last May > (25th/26th), when the C55 build was more subtlely broken. Yes, that's what I finally remembered. I think I've fixed all occurrences (by adding EXTEND32)

...evsen <holger at debian.org>} [piuparts] piuparts: rescheduling old logs by piuparts-master Changed Bug submitter to 'Andreas Beckmann <anbe at debian.org>' from 'Andreas Beckmann <debian at abeckmann.de>' > submitter 694674 ! Bug #694674 {Done: Rob Browning <rlb at defaultvalue.org>} [emacsen-common] emacsen-common: wrong compilation logic; only the last script in dependency chains is actually compiled Bug #693472 {Done: Rob Browning <rlb at defaultvalue.org>} [emacsen-common] emacsen-common: wrong compilation logic; only the last script in depend...

On my lab systems, the automatic updates were failing because of the problems with ipod libraries from EPEL being in the way. It turns out that was a good thing, because when I "fixed" it, a massive set of packages was updated, including the new gtk3. These packages are the ones causing problems, I think. gtk3-3.22.10-4.el7.x86_64 gtk3-devel-3.22.10-4.el7.x86_64 In the release notes,

...7^7D_%62\Z]FE>U/:ELA8N1$#!D<QS^^A/ZJOR2I MOR0R\=P.4\,]_;4WX5 +UC1YR=\KTBL2Z3,VZ5Q_4?.G)CU)0U=GT<(YS:*% M3CO+D#K+Y-#"I$]RI">YG">Y]$F>]"2/^3@SO!OM!8N#/NVO0.JOD,.,D#XI MDIX4H>"S8E,]Z_.FK)CVUH346Y,<7DS2)YV0GG2"B)$9,3XZ.7S7_CI)^VM* MZJ]I#C.FZ9,*TI,*1(RLB.&,YT6,(NVMDM1;90XORO1)%>E)%<I->>6FX+GI M3^K12))'(S-V?5Q_4?,GR5V0$N6FK(CAO6)I3YFFQ9*4%LN<M%BF:;$DI<52 M0V-D:HR@-(\9:68L29FQS,F,99H92TMZDH4?F4V-8.%',@-OU(9EPDN;DIYD M!\D<.TBF=I DV4'2PX_,H@6S-B-3+TB2<GZ9D_/+-.>7I)Q?(N?/#+I1&,%C M1IKS2U+.+Z?(Q'/&&l...

...only connections Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 672719 + jessie Bug #672719 [src:grass] grass: FTBFS on ppc64 and s390x Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 701278 + jessie Bug #701278 [src:flush] flush: ftbfs with GCC-4.8 Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 638926 + jessie Bug #638926 {Done: Rob Browning <rlb at defaultvalue.org>} [emacs23] emacs23: FTBFS on any-i386: bogus path due to #define i386 1 Bug #620795 {Done: Rob Browning <rlb at defaultvalue.org>} [emacs23] emacs23: Makefile generation with cpp mangles multiarch include paths (impending FTBFS) Added tag(s) jessie. Added tag(s) jessie...