Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "rl221994".
Did you mean:
r221994
2014 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM Weekly - #46, Nov 17th 2014
...hard to work out without the
context of the bug, which many of us do not have access to.
## LLVM commits
* Work on call lowering for MIPS FastISel has started.
[r221948](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL221948).
* Work has started on an assembler for the R600 backend.
[r221994](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL221994).
* A pass implementing forward control-flow integrity as been added.
[r221708](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL221708).
* A whole slew of patches that made MDNode a Value have been reverted due to a
change in plan. The aim is now to separate metadata from the Value hierarchy.
[r221711](http://reviews....