search for: rks

...y])) a=rep(seq(ceiling(length(data$x)/4)),each=2) b=rep(c(0,1),ceiling(length(data$x)/4)) rk.up=c(1,(a*4+b))[1:ceiling(length(data$x)/2)] rk.down=rev(c(a*4+b-2)[1:floor(length(data$x)/2)]) cat("Performing Siegel-Tukey rank transformation...","\n","\n") rks=c(rk.up,rk.down) unqs=unique(sort(data$x)) corr.rks=tapply(rks,data$x,mean) cbind(unqs,corr.rks) rks.data=data.frame(unqs,corr.rks) names(rks.data)=c("unique values of x","tie-adjusted Siegel-Tukey rank") print(rks.data,row.names=F) names(rks.data)=c("unqs&quo...

...Decl *D, AnalysisManager& mgr, BugReporter &BR) if (CFG *cfg = mgr.getCFG(D)) call cfg->dump() llvm-3.1.src/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend/AnalysisConsumer.cpp:472 - AnalysisConsumer::HandleCode(Decl *D, AnalysisMode Mode, SetOfConstDecls *VisitedCallees) /usr/home3/rks/llvm/llvm-3.1.src/tools/clang/lib/Analysis/CFG.cpp:3166 - CFG* CFG::buildCFG(const Decl *D, Stmt *Statement, ASTContext *C, const BuildOptions &BO) { CFGBuilder Builder(C, BO); return Builder.buildCFG(D, Statement); } I have tried to debug clang using gdb (by running r -cc1 -analyze...

...socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 remote announce = 192.168.8.255,192.168.9.255 wins server = 192.168.8.10 dns proxy = no nt acl support = yes null passwords = yes [res] path = /raid/res browseable = yes read only = yes write list = bis, rks, srv, pmd, ram, roh, mop [sts] path = /raid/sts browseable = yes read only = yes write list = bis, rks, srv, ram, stm, vdp, ban, spn, ppl, ngr Please suggest me a way out. Thanks, Honey Bajaj

I don't see -flto option with clang 3.0/1 as Duncan mentioned. Can you give me specific pointers to generate in-memory CFG using clang + llvm ? Rajendra http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~rks

...had it working previously, so I started to think maybe the problem was on my compiled versions. I went and tested the following versions available on kernel.org: - syslinux-3.74: locks - syslinux-3.73: locks - syslinux-3.72: locks - syslinux-3.71: locks - syslinux-3.70: locks - syslinux-3.63: it v?rks!!! I was ready to give up and declare the culprit my kernel (2.6.30-rc3), my distro (F10) and the phase of the Moon. I'm still not sure it's not one of those three, as I'm almost definitively sure it worked in a 3.7x. I'll do some more tests, including in a different system, so a...

...le gives me >> [2011/01/11 13:22:53, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(2230) [000] 02 50 43 20 4E 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 20 50 52 4F 47 .PC NETW ORK PROG [010] 52 41 4D 20 31 2E 30 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F RAM 1.0. .MICROSO [020] 46 54 20 4E 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 53 20 31 2E 30 33 FT NETWO RKS 1.03 [030] 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F 46 54 20 4E 45 54 57 ..MICROS OFT NETW [040] 4F 52 4B 53 20 33 2E 30 00 02 4C 41 4E 4D 41 4E ORKS 3.0 ..LANMAN [050] 31 2E 30 00 02 4C 4D 31 2E 32 58 30 30 32 00 02 1.0..LM1 .2X002.. [060] 44 4F 53 20 4C 41 4E 4D 41 4E 32 2E 31 00 02 4C DOS...

...t original program back from this LLVM IR? 3) what about `clang -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc' - without using -O3 optimization flag, is this LLVM IR an in-memory CFG? These queries may be trivial but I need this info to proceed further. Thank you. Rajendra http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~rks -------- Original Message -------- Subject: LLVMdev Digest, Vol 99, Issue 65 Date: 28-09-2012 10:26 PM From: llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Reply-To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Message: 8 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:45:23 +0200 From: Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr>...

I have been trying to make password changing work with Samba from a Windows 95 clients. All the workstations use nonencrypted passwords. The server is SCO Open Server, Samba 1.9.18p10. The relevant lines of smb.conf are passwd chat = *Old*password* %o\n "1):" \n *New*password* %n\n *Re-enter*password* %n \n passwd chat debug = yes passwd program = /bin/passwd unix password sync = yes...

...smb_flg2=1 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=2498 smb_uid=500 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=129 [000] 02 50 43 20 4E 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 20 50 52 4F 47 .PC NETW ORK PROG [010] 52 41 4D 20 31 2E 30 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F RAM 1.0. .MICROSO [020] 46 54 20 4E 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 53 20 31 2E 30 33 FT NETWO RKS 1.03 [030] 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F 46 54 20 4E 45 54 57 ..MICROS OFT NETW [040] 4F 52 4B 53 20 33 2E 30 00 02 4C 41 4E 4D 41 4E ORKS 3.0 ..LANMAN [050] 31 2E 30 00 02 4C 4D 31 2E 32 58 30 30 32 00 02 1.0..LM1 .2X002.. [060] 53 61 6D 62 61 00 02 4E 54 20 4C 4D 20 30 2E 31 Samba..N T L...

...utions I found worked for me. When I try to connect to my samba share with an Active Directory domain account, I get denied: $ smbclient -U SOTS+jason //media/tmp xxxxxxxx session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE Looking at the log files I found this (complete file is posted below): --==workstation.log==-- [2007/03/09 09:48:29, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(319) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [SOTS+jason] -> [SOTS+jason] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER However, wbinfo returns the user information fine: # wbinfo -i SOTS+jason SOTS+jason:*:10000:10000:J...

...0 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=133 [2007/01/30 15:54:53, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(2222) [000] 02 50 43 20 4E 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 20 50 52 4F 47 .PC NETW ORK PROG [010] 52 41 4D 20 31 2E 30 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F RAM 1.0. .MICROSO [020] 46 54 20 4E 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 53 20 31 2E 30 33 FT NETWO RKS 1.03 [030] 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F 46 54 20 4E 45 54 57 ..MICROS OFT NETW [040] 4F 52 4B 53 20 33 2E 30 00 02 4C 41 4E 4D 41 4E ORKS 3.0 ..LANMAN [050] 31 2E 30 00 02 4C 4D 31 2E 32 58 30 30 32 00 02 1.0..LM1 .2X002.. [060] 4C 41 4E 4D 41 4E 32 2E 31 00 02 4E 54 20 4C 41 LANMAN2....

...d=30811, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../lib/util/util.c:559(dump_data) [0000] 02 50 43 20 4E 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 20 50 52 4F 47 .PC NETW ORK PROG [0010] 52 41 4D 20 31 2E 30 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F RAM 1.0. .MICROSO [0020] 46 54 20 4E 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 53 20 31 2E 30 33 FT NETWO RKS 1.03 [0030] 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F 46 54 20 4E 45 54 57 ..MICROS OFT NETW [0040] 4F 52 4B 53 20 33 2E 30 00 02 4C 41 4E 4D 41 4E ORKS 3.0 ..LANMAN [0050] 31 2E 30 00 02 4C 4D 31 2E 32 58 30 30 32 00 02 1.0..LM1 .2X002.. [0060] 44 4F 53 20 4C 41 4E 4D 41 4E 32 2E 31 00 02 4...

...54 57 4F 52 4B 20 50 52 4F 47 .PC NETW ORK PROG [2003/02/19 22:18:09, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1539) [010] 52 41 4D 20 31 2E 30 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F RAM 1.0. .MICROSO [2003/02/19 22:18:09, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1539) [020] 46 54 20 4E 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 53 20 31 2E 30 33 FT NETWO RKS 1.03 [2003/02/19 22:18:09, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1539) [030] 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F 46 54 20 4E 45 54 57 ..MICROS OFT NETW [2003/02/19 22:18:09, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1539) [040] 4F 52 4B 53 20 33 2E 30 00 02 4C 41 4E 4D 41 4E ORKS 3.0 ..LANMAN [2003/02/19 22:18:09, 10] lib/util.c...

...ing host lookup for name EEBRSPNT001<0x20> [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(864) Connecting to 172.18.9.101 at port 139 [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(1034) No such user administrator [EERDBR001] - using guest account Smbclient still works perfectly... Anyone can give me a light? PS: getent group or passwd shows only the users of the linux box (from nsswitch.conf, the files part, and there is a winbind entry there) Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] Sent: quarta-feira, 8 de agosto de 2001 1...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking

Hi, I want to generate Control Flow Graph (in memory CFG object) of any given C program and then iterate over this CFG (all function, basic blocks and instructions) using llvm iterators. I can see text output of CFG on screen, using following command: `clang -cc1 -Idummyh -analyze -analyzer-checker=debug.DumpCFG hello/hello.c' where dummyh has en empty stdio.h to remove this error: `fatal