search for: rkavunga

Resolved! Try it again. - amye On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Mohammed Rafi K C <rkavunga at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Amye, > > The form is not accessible, it says > > Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release > The form Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release is no longer accepting > responses. > Try contacting the owner of the form if you think this is a mistake. > &gt...

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Mohammed Rafi K C <rkavunga at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Jiffin/Shyam, > > > Snapshot volume has been broken in 3.12 . We just got the bug, I have > send a patch [1] . Let me know your thought. > > > Similar with subdir mount's authentication. [2] [2] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18489/ &...

On 12/10/17 16:05, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Mohammed Rafi K C > <rkavunga at redhat.com <mailto:rkavunga at redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hi Jiffin/Shyam, > > > Snapshot volume has been broken in 3.12 . We just got the bug, I have > send a patch [1] . Let me know your thought. > > > > Similar with subdir mount's authentic...

HI I have filed an issue to the bugzilla, please refer to this hyper-link. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477014 Regards ???: Mohammed Rafi K C [mailto:rkavunga at redhat.com] ????: 2017?7?27? 22:02 ???: Liu, Dan/? ?; gluster-users at gluster.org ??: Re: [Gluster-users] Mess code when encryption It looks like a bug to me. Can you file an issue in github. Regards Rafi KC On 07/05/2017 03:30 PM, Liu, Dan wrote: Hi everyone, I have a question about usi...

Hi, Somewhere I read that zfs snapshots are under the development. are there any news? Thanks, Arman. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170817/df8afb76/attachment.html>

Yes. It is in the review phase . Actually Sriram implemented zfs snapshot and Mark implemented the brtfs and Mark merged these two patches [1]. Adding them in cc . Reviews are most welcome. [1] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17865/ Regards Rafi KC On 08/17/2017 05:22 PM, Arman Khalatyan wrote: > Hi, > Somewhere I read that zfs snapshots are under the development. > are there any

Hi Amye, The form is not accessible, it says Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release The form Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release is no longer accepting responses. Try contacting the owner of the form if you think this is a mistake. Regards Rafi KC On 06/05/2017 01:25 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > We're doing something new now with releases, running a retrospective > on what things we as a

We're doing something new now with releases, running a retrospective on what things we as a community should stop, what we should start, and what we should continue. With last week's release, here's our quick form for 3.11 https://goo.gl/forms/OkhNZDFspYqdN00g2 We'll keep this open until June 15th to give everyone time to give us feedback. Thanks! -- Amye Scavarda | amye at

...__________________________ > I.T. Systems:Keele University > Finance & IT Directorate > Keele:Staffs:IC1 Building:ST5 5NB:UK > +44 1782 733063 <%2B44%201782%20733073> > ________________________________________________ > > On 31 May 2017 at 12:38, Mohammed Rafi K C <rkavunga at redhat.com> wrote: > >> Can you give us more logs on this issue. Also by any chance did somebody >> unmount the lv's in any cases ? >> >> >> Regards >> >> Rafi KC >> >> On 05/31/2017 03:00 PM, Gary Lloyd wrote: >> >> Hi...

Hi everyone, I have a question about using encryption in Gluster FS. 1.Created a file (file size is smaller than 1k) in the volume?s mount point. 2.Read the file, finally got a mess code. I found that the content I got is from cache and no decryption is operated on the file content, so mess code returns. If I set the following property to off, then everything is OK. performance.quick-read

Hi Jiffin/Shyam, Snapshot volume has been broken in 3.12 . We just got the bug, I have send a patch [1] . Let me know your thought. [1] : https://review.gluster.org/18506 On 10/12/2017 12:32 PM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote: > Hi, > > I am planning to do 3.12.2 release today 11:00 pm IST (5:30 pm GMT). > > Following bugs is removed from tracker list > > Bug 1493422 - AFR :

Volumes are aggregation of bricks, so I would consider bricks as a unique entity here rather than volumes. Taking the constraints from the blog [1]. * All bricks should be carved out from an independent thinly provisioned logical volume (LV). In other words, no two brick should share a common LV. More details about thin provisioning and thin provisioned snapshot can be found here. * This thinly

I think the problem here is by default the quorum is playing around here, to get rid of this you can change quorum type as fixed and the value as 2 , or you can disable the quorum. Regards Rafi KC On 11/08/2017 04:03 AM, Jon Cope wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm taking a stab at deploying a storage cluster to explore the Halo > AFR feature and running into some trouble. In GCE, I

Thanks Rafi, that's understood now :) I'm considering to deploy gluster on a 4 x 40 TB? bricks, do you think it would better to make 1 LVM partition for each Volume I need or to make one Big LVM partition and start multiple volumes on it ? We'll store mostly big files (videos) on this environement. Le 11/10/2017 ? 09:34, Mohammed Rafi K C a ?crit?: > > On 10/11/2017 12:20

Can you please explain How we ended up in this scenario. I think that will help to understand more about this scenarios and why gluster recommend replica 3 or arbiter volume. Regards Rafi KC On 06/15/2017 10:46 AM, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > Hi Ludwig, > > There is no way to resolve gfid split-brains with type mismatch. You > have to do it manually by following the steps in [1].

Hi all, I'm taking a stab at deploying a storage cluster to explore the Halo AFR feature and running into some trouble. In GCE, I have 4 instances, each with one 10gb brick. 2 instances are in the US and the other 2 are in Asia (with the hope that it will drive up latency sufficiently). The bricks make up a Replica-4 volume. Before I enable halo, I can mount to volume and r/w files. The

Are you still facing the problem ? If so, Can you please provide the workload , cmd_log_history file, log files , etc ? Regards Rafi KC On 06/23/2017 02:06 PM, shridhar s n wrote: > Hi All, > > We are using GlusterFS 3.10.2 (upgraded from 3.7.0 last week) on > CentOS 7.x . > > We continue to see memory utilization going up once every 3 days. The > memory utilization of

Can you describe the setup and the tests you did ? Is it consistently reproducible ? also you can file a bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ On 06/29/2017 02:46 PM, Alexandre Blanca wrote: > Hi, > > I want to manage access on dispersed volume. > When I use *gluster volume set test_volume auth.allow/IP_ADDRESS > /*//it works but with /*HOSTNAME*/* ***the filter doesn't

The current sharding has very limited use cases like vmstore where the clients accessing the sharded file will always be one. Krutuka will be the right person to answer your questions . Regards Rafi KC On 06/30/2017 04:28 PM, gencer at gencgiyen.com wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have an 2 nodes with 20 bricks in total (10+10). > > > > First test: > > >

Hi All, I'm attending both DevConf (25-28) and Fosdem (3-4). If any of you are attending the conferences and would like to talk about gluster, please feel free to ping me through irc nick rafi on freenode or message me on +436649795838 Regards Rafi KC