search for: rjm

...return the whole URL line -- given d) above -- what would be returned is: " LINK organic | backyard farm | healthy " h) the search engine should be configurable as to CSS and pagination for many URLs returned. Is Xapian appropriate to use in this case? Very much appreciated, Robert rjm at gandsnut.net

...;open)) > > > > > + if (unlikely(!ops->open)) > > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > > > > > > > if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) > > > > > return -ENODEV; > > > > > > > RJM>] My understanding lately is that this call to > > try_module_get(THIS_MODULE) is no longer needed as is considered as a > > latent bug. > > Quote from > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1741415/linux-kernel-modules-when-to-use-try-module-get-module-put > >...

...;open)) > > > > > + if (unlikely(!ops->open)) > > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > > > > > > > if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) > > > > > return -ENODEV; > > > > > > > RJM>] My understanding lately is that this call to > > try_module_get(THIS_MODULE) is no longer needed as is considered as a > > latent bug. > > Quote from > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1741415/linux-kernel-modules-when-to-use-try-module-get-module-put > >...

...gt; - if (unlikely(!parent->ops->open)) > > > > + if (unlikely(!ops->open)) > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > > > > > if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) > > > > return -ENODEV; > > > > RJM>] My understanding lately is that this call to > try_module_get(THIS_MODULE) is no longer needed as is considered as a > latent bug. > Quote from > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1741415/linux-kernel-modules-when-to-use-try-module-get-module-put > : > There are a number...

...unlikely(!ops->open)) > > > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > > > > > > > > > if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) > > > > > > return -ENODEV; > > > > > > > > > > RJM>] My understanding lately is that this call to > > > try_module_get(THIS_MODULE) is no longer needed as is considered as a > > > latent bug. > > > Quote from > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1741415/linux-kernel-modules-when-to-use-try-module-get-...

...> int ret; > > > > > > - if (unlikely(!parent->ops->open)) > > > + if (unlikely(!ops->open)) > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > > > if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) > > > return -ENODEV; > RJM>] My understanding lately is that this call to try_module_get(THIS_MODULE) is no longer needed as is considered as a latent bug. Quote from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1741415/linux-kernel-modules-when-to-use-try-module-get-module-put : There are a number of uses of try_module_get(THIS_...

...> int ret; > > > > > > - if (unlikely(!parent->ops->open)) > > > + if (unlikely(!ops->open)) > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > > > if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) > > > return -ENODEV; > RJM>] My understanding lately is that this call to try_module_get(THIS_MODULE) is no longer needed as is considered as a latent bug. Quote from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1741415/linux-kernel-modules-when-to-use-try-module-get-module-put : There are a number of uses of try_module_get(THIS_...

Dear list: I have a problem I cannot handle yet, and need to solve it as soon as possible. Would be very greatful with anybody who can help me. I have a 512/512 link to internet, that I want to share between several computers. I have eth0, with a public IP address, conected to Internet, and also, eth1, with a private IP address, for network with the surfing computers. I have a main class with

On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:53:29 +0800 Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > Currently, except for the create and remove, the rest of > mdev_parent_ops is designed for vfio-mdev driver only and may not help > for kernel mdev driver. With the help of class id, this patch > introduces device specific callbacks inside mdev_device > structure. This allows different set of

On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:53:29 +0800 Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > Currently, except for the create and remove, the rest of > mdev_parent_ops is designed for vfio-mdev driver only and may not help > for kernel mdev driver. With the help of class id, this patch > introduces device specific callbacks inside mdev_device > structure. This allows different set of

...^1M^Ac)DK_LeLex at 0-#he$ z>vWP4Blk(|XufIH9B`7+L&~P6F4yTQkj_Ivhd)Pp2!;2g_lJ+{)-FZ*+%nv-q$=a{ zT^1!C7Tnb{+7dS*0dyaL7iVe{R|H%6x9oTYJ+)Xez=1*lBbGVi-6u1X9}YWt>|WtB zHQ9N%_!z_B$wt$zt5t3Gsg2{uR^&k4j@>$tO-4cRH1YNIy!tO5paHHL1zg1WFd1>K zm&FZEH^58PPv$!f6+alt{~USvr|9nclGfI at Xi$2C005KmRjM^qT~3ZH+sKh%{M`#Q z>pYOAIldA<nw6pS+&ziO0 at YAAW-UHdLy=klr+81#Z~I7%d<9Tzva at rSTTJYpl`38T z_1%&QqH1PjV%1u0(a&^MZB1f<*g7A8SD?TV`RuiL|DVHSX&wSbV>{5w;x3k3jRO(b z^&^}cLn$0T8iZWOez^`oMNklbh*cY~*o66Ia at -laa7ZRsyOjQ-`hjV)f`+cWL3`q< z50lkzd85P1F`t37KMHasw$$?TSCsQW63w...

we have an external 2Mbit dsl connection and running on it are several gre vpn tunnels so far i''ve given priority to the vpn traffic (using htb) can i now put rules in for the tunnels to control traffic within each tunnel (that''s where our video conferencing etc runs)? or can i only control the real interface (eth1 in our setup)? if not can i somehow see the packets inside the