Displaying 20 results from an estimated 21 matches for "rinstal".
Did you mean:
instal
2015 Jan 26
2
Building rinstaller using R-devel (3.2.0-to-be) halts when trying to copy html files
As the build process, especially for Windows, is changing
significantly for R 3.2.0, I am trying to build R-devel in
preparation. When running `make rinstaller`, I get the following
error:
cp -p ../../../etc/x64/Makeconf R-devel/etc/x64
mkdir -p R-devel/doc
cp -p ../../../doc/CRAN_mirrors.csv R-devel/doc
mkdir -p R-devel/doc/manual/images
cp -pR ../../../doc/html R-devel/doc
cp -p ../../../doc/manual/*.html ../../../doc/manual/...
2015 Jan 27
0
Building rinstaller using R-devel (3.2.0-to-be) halts when trying to copy html files
On 26/01/2015 5:12 PM, Avraham Adler wrote:
> As the build process, especially for Windows, is changing
> significantly for R 3.2.0, I am trying to build R-devel in
> preparation. When running `make rinstaller`, I get the following
> error:
>
> cp -p ../../../etc/x64/Makeconf R-devel/etc/x64
> mkdir -p R-devel/doc
> cp -p ../../../doc/CRAN_mirrors.csv R-devel/doc
> mkdir -p R-devel/doc/manual/images
> cp -pR ../../../doc/html R-devel/doc
> cp -p ../../....
1998 Nov 18
2
RINSTALL with doc clobbers function.html
In R 0.63 RINSTALL of a package with documentation still appears to clobber
R/doc/html/function.html and R/doc/html/packages.html so the main help is no
longer available to a user once a package is installed.
I know how to work around this for my own purposes, but I hesitate to release a
package that would do this...
1998 Nov 18
0
more on RINSTALL with doc clobbers function.html
After some investigation I find that "R INSTALL dse" seems to work well.
Also,
"R REMOVE dse" works but does not clean out ~/.R (which would be pretty
difficult because all users may have this). The result is that a user will have
the impression that the package is installed when it has be remove. (This is
probably not too serious.)
However, "R INSTALL -l rlibs
2009 Jun 06
3
No --no-latex?
Hi,
Having finally gotten around to installing R-2.9.0, I find that while
the docs still say I can invoke the --no-latex option, R CMD INSTALL has
decided that I can't. Nor is there any notice of this that I can find in
the 2.9 series news. Is this just a trifling oversight that will be
repaired?
Jim
2008 Apr 29
1
non-digits in svnversion output mess up windows build if USE_SVNVERSION=yes (PR#11339)
...eports the highest version in the range. If there
are still non-digits in there it makes the version string "0"
(not useful, but doesn't kill the build with a noninformative
error message).
I ran into another problem with the trailing 'M' from svnversion
when doing 'make rinstaller' in R_HOME/src/gnuwin32:
E:\R\R-svn\r-devel\src\gnuwin32\installer>type R-2.8.0dev.log
Inno Setup 5 Command-Line Compiler
...
Compiler engine version: Inno Setup 5.2.3 (ISPP 5.2.3.0)
...
[ISPP] Preprocessing.
...
[ISPP] Preprocessed.
Parsing [Setup] section, lin...
2003 May 07
1
Problems building R-1.7.0 on windows XP
...ke distribution
The last few lines from the make output is:
Copying spatial
find rw1070 -name CVS -prune -exec rm -rf \{\} \;
FIND: formato de par?metros incorrecto
make[2]: *** [imagedir] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/R/Rsource/R-
1.7.0/src/gnuwin32/installer'
make[1]: *** [rinstaller] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/R/Rsource/R-
1.7.0/src/gnuwin32'
make: *** [distribution] Error 2
So there seems to be a problem with find. I downloaded and innstalled
the latest version of tools.zip today.
Any idea of what is going wrong?
Kjetil Halvorsen
2005 Feb 07
1
Problems encountered/fixed making CrossCompileBuild
...=$(CROSSDIR)/bin:$(CROSSDIR)/mingw32/bin:$(PATH); \
cd $(WINR)/$(R)/src/gnuwin32/; \
$(MAKE) recommended
# dist-recommended:
# mkdir -p $(WINRLIBS); \
# cd $(WINR)/$(R)/src/gnuwin32/; \
# $(MAKE) dist-recommended; \
# mv Recommended.zip $(WINRLIBS)/
clean:
rm -rf $(WINR)
#### not tested
# rinstaller:
# export
PATH=$(CROSSDIR)/bin:$(CROSSDIR)/mingw32/bin:$(PATH); \
# cd $(WINR)/$(R)/src/gnuwin32/; \
# $(MAKE) rinstaller
CrossCompileBuild :
$(MAKE) down
$(MAKE) xtools
$(MAKE) prepsrc
$(MAKE) mkrules
$(MAKE) R
1999 Mar 09
1
example(.) partly broken (since 0.63.3) --> patch (PR#134)
...orking
.Alias, "%in%", lm, glm, lsfit, unix, Re, ... (most?)
It really is the 'AnIndex' file which is broken,
either because of incorrect syntax in changed *.Rd files
or because the AnIndex building scripts are broken or not robust enough..
My "AnIndex" (i.e. RINSTALL/library/base/help/AnIndex)
has line 482
-----------------------------
glm summaries glm.summaries
-----------------------------
which then is scan()ed as 3 character strings instead of 2, and then
everything following is mixed up......
Other (not necessarily all) such bad lines are
-------------...
2015 Mar 09
1
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the update, Hsiu-Khuern. Can you check how many digits
> scientific notation shows? I was able to build a 64bit version of R
> using the mingw64 4.8.4 distro, but ran into trouble with compat.c,
> and the only work-around I found ended breaking R's defualt two digit
>
2001 Mar 22
1
Preview of an alternative R for Windows installer
I have built a version of the current 1.2.2 patched version of R using
Inno Setup2 (http://www.jrsoftware.org/isinfo.htm). (That toolkit is
open source (in Delphi) and was fairly easy to tame. Full details are
in the R-patched sources.) This gives a single ~10Mb file, at
http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/RWin/SetupR.exe
The idea is that it should look very like a Windows 2000-style install,
and
2008 Apr 29
0
non-digits in svnversion output mess up windows build if (PR#11340)
...the range. If there
> are still non-digits in there it makes the version string "0"
> (not useful, but doesn't kill the build with a noninformative
> error message).
>
> I ran into another problem with the trailing 'M' from svnversion
> when doing 'make rinstaller' in R_HOME/src/gnuwin32:
> E:\R\R-svn\r-devel\src\gnuwin32\installer>type R-2.8.0dev.log
> Inno Setup 5 Command-Line Compiler
> ...
> Compiler engine version: Inno Setup 5.2.3 (ISPP 5.2.3.0)
> ...
> [ISPP] Preprocessing.
> ...
> [ISPP] Prepr...
2008 Apr 19
1
nondigits in R_FILEVERSION mess up Windows build
I tried for the first time to build R from source on Windows, where I
got the source code via svn. Per the Installation and Administration
manual, I altered src\gnuwin32\MkRules so it had the the locally
correct paths to HTML Help Workshop and Inno Setup 5. I also set
USE_SVNVERSION=yes, as suggested in MkRules itself. Then, while in
the directory src/gnuwin32 I ran 'make all
2002 Jun 04
4
"X11 font at size 16 could not be loaded"
Hi,
I'm using plot.lda (R1.4.0 on linux) and,
if dimen > 2, I get the error:
Error in text.default(x, y, txt, cex = cex, font = font) :
X11 font at size 16 could not be loaded
The traceback indicates that the problem
comes from pairs(). I've tried several
cex and font values, always with the
same error.
The same command works fine with pdf()
If I'm missing fonts, how
2008 Apr 29
0
non-digits in svnversion output mess up windows build if (PR#11341)
...; are still non-digits in there it makes the version string "0"
> > (not useful, but doesn't kill the build with a noninformative
> > error message).
> >
> > I ran into another problem with the trailing 'M' from svnversion
> > when doing 'make rinstaller' in R_HOME/src/gnuwin32:
> > E:\R\R-svn\r-devel\src\gnuwin32\installer>type R-2.8.0dev.log
> > Inno Setup 5 Command-Line Compiler
> > ...
> > Compiler engine version: Inno Setup 5.2.3 (ISPP 5.2.3.0)
> > ...
> > [ISPP] Preprocessing.
&g...
2015 Jan 08
1
New version of Rtools for Windows
...of that this would fail here is that GCC version 4.9 did
make some changes to enhance link-time optimization [5], and probably
something isn't compatible. I then downgraded to GCC 4.8.4 [6], and,
with the deletion of those 10 or so lines from compat.c, I can
complete the build straight through rinstaller. However, I get that
failure issue due to the extra 0 in scientific notation [7].
It does not matter if I do the entire process in the MSYS2
environment, or if I do in in Windows with msys\usr\bin in my path.
Na?vely, it seems that if there were some what for stdio to be
included in compat.c,...
2015 Jan 08
0
New version of Rtools for Windows
...rmail/r-devel/2014-December/070319.html
>
>
>Many thanks to you and others for looking into this,
>Henric
>
>
>
>> I then downgraded to GCC 4.8.4 [6], and,
>> with the deletion of those 10 or so lines from compat.c, I can
>> complete the build straight through rinstaller. However, I get that
>> failure issue due to the extra 0 in scientific notation [7].
>>
>> It does not matter if I do the entire process in the MSYS2
>> environment, or if I do in in Windows with msys\usr\bin in my path.
>>
>> Na?vely, it seems that if there w...
2015 Jan 08
1
New version of Rtools for Windows
...>>
>>
>>Many thanks to you and others for looking into this,
>>Henric
>>
>>
>>
>>> I then downgraded to GCC 4.8.4 [6], and,
>>> with the deletion of those 10 or so lines from compat.c, I can
>>> complete the build straight through rinstaller. However, I get that
>>> failure issue due to the extra 0 in scientific notation [7].
>>>
>>> It does not matter if I do the entire process in the MSYS2
>>> environment, or if I do in in Windows with msys\usr\bin in my path.
>>>
>>> Na?vely,...
2015 Jan 08
0
New version of Rtools for Windows
...>>
>>
>>Many thanks to you and others for looking into this,
>>Henric
>>
>>
>>
>>> I then downgraded to GCC 4.8.4 [6], and,
>>> with the deletion of those 10 or so lines from compat.c, I can
>>> complete the build straight through rinstaller. However, I get that
>>> failure issue due to the extra 0 in scientific notation [7].
>>>
>>> It does not matter if I do the entire process in the MSYS2
>>> environment, or if I do in in Windows with msys\usr\bin in my path.
>>>
>>> Na?vely,...
2015 Mar 10
3
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
Hi Duncan,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Duncan Murdoch
<murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/03/2015 11:07 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On 08/03/2015 10:02 PM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> [This