search for: rings

I have a running * with a TDM40B board in it. I have 3 analog phones that works (rings) perfectly when connected to a Telco POTS line. When connected to the Digium TDM40B (with FXS port), I have problems with 'ringing': 1 phone 'ringes' normally 1 phone 'ringes' a bit cripled (instead of ring-ring... ring-ring..., it does 'ring-ri... ri.... ring... ri.....

I am somewhat unsure as to the definition of "Distinctive Ring". What I am trying to achieve is to have Zap connected phones (TDM400P) ring with different cadences depending on whether the call is incoming on the PSTN context or an IAX2 context. Googling, I find this from Mark: I've added distinctive ring support to Asterisk now (also I've added answer confirmation which is

Hi all, I would like to ask please if there is a way to play a ring back tone from asterisk when the customer try to make a call...I already added the ringing function to the context in extensions .conf and it work perfectly...But the issue that the asterisk server is stoping playing back his own ring back tone as soon as it detect a ring back tone coming from the carrier side... Is there a way

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 08:25:05AM +0000, Xie, Huawei wrote: > Hi: > > Recently I have done one virtio optimization proof of concept. The > optimization includes two parts: > 1) avail ring set with fixed descriptors > 2) RX vectorization > With the optimizations, we could have several times of performance boost > for purely vhost-virtio throughput. Thanks! I'm very

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 08:25:05AM +0000, Xie, Huawei wrote: > Hi: > > Recently I have done one virtio optimization proof of concept. The > optimization includes two parts: > 1) avail ring set with fixed descriptors > 2) RX vectorization > With the optimizations, we could have several times of performance boost > for purely vhost-virtio throughput. Thanks! I'm very

...*/ > unsigned ring; > + > + wait_queue_t fence_wake; > }; > > int radeon_fence_driver_start_ring(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring); > @@ -2268,6 +2269,7 @@ struct radeon_device { > struct radeon_mman mman; > struct radeon_fence_driver fence_drv[RADEON_NUM_RINGS]; > wait_queue_head_t fence_queue; > + unsigned fence_context; > struct mutex ring_lock; > struct radeon_ring ring[RADEON_NUM_RINGS]; > bool ib_pool_ready; > @@ -2358,11 +2360,6 @@ u32 cik_mm_rdoorbell(struct radeon_device > *rdev, u32 index); > void cik_mm...

...ing; > + > + wait_queue_t fence_wake; > }; > > int radeon_fence_driver_start_ring(struct radeon_device *rdev, int > ring); > @@ -2256,6 +2257,7 @@ struct radeon_device { > struct radeon_mman mman; > struct radeon_fence_driver fence_drv[RADEON_NUM_RINGS]; > wait_queue_head_t fence_queue; > + unsigned fence_context; > struct mutex ring_lock; > struct radeon_ring ring[RADEON_NUM_RINGS]; > bool ib_pool_ready; > @@ -2346,11 +2348,6 @@ u32 cik_mm_rdoorbell(struc...

I have a number of Zap/ extensions defined in a queue with ringall strategy. When this queue is called sometimes Asterisk seems to think that one of these channels is busy, while it is NOT. The following is shown on the console: --Called 44 -- Called 36 -- Called 41 -- Called 35 -- Called 38 -- Zap/44-1 is ringing -- Zap/36-1 is ringing -- Zap/41-1 is ringing

I have Asterisk running with a combination of SIP and H323 clients. I am using the OH323 module instead of the H323 one. When the SIP clients ring each other, they can hear a ringing noise in the ear peice to let them know that the other parties phone is ringing. However, when the H323 client rings a SIP client, there is no ringing sound at all, although as soon as the called party picks up the phone, everything works fine. This is the entry from my extensions.conf: exten => _7[5-9]X,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN},20,rt) exten => _7[5-9]X,2,Playback(vm-nobodyavail) exten => _7[5-9]X,3,Hangup...

...and Zap/2-1 -- Hungup 'Zap/2-1' == Spawn extension (incoming, s, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/1-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1' AS indicated, the call is switched to the context [incoming] which is configured as follows; [incoming] exten=> s,1,Dial,Zap/2 The extension rings but not until the incoming line has rung three times. If I hang-up the external line before the extension is answered then the extension continues to ring three more times. Clearly, if I pick up the extension during this time then nobody is there! I would like the extension to ring immediately wh...

...al(Zap/1,10) exten => 101,3,Congestion I also uncommented the "noload => chan_oss.so" in /etc/asterisk/modules.conf because I don't have a sound card. Other than that, all conf files are the originals from "make samples". But when I dial 101 from Zap/2, Zap/1 rings (and if I pick it up, I can have a conversation with myself), but I don't hear a ringing tone out of Zap/2. I commented out the Dial and Congestion, and then I heard a two ringing tones, a click, and a congestion tone, while the console said: pbx.c:1836 ast_pbx_run: Timeout, but no rule ...

...ing a couple of Xorcom Astribanks to provide FXS ports. (I'm using the zaptel 1.2 branch, if that matters) I've noticed that the ringing volume is a lot louder than on our old phone system, and people are starting to complain it's too loud. (This is the noise the phone makes when it rings, not the noise in your handset when you ring someone else) Having had a look through the code, I think that Asterisk passes the responsibility for ringing the phones to Zaptel, which drives the astribank to make them ring. Is this correct? Despite looking through the zaptel source code, I cou...

...gt; queues are enabled) to prepare and inject packets, I got ~12% > > performance boost (5.7Mpps -> 6.4Mpps). And if the vhost PMD > > is faster (e.g. just need to iterate the first two queues to > > prepare and inject packets), then I got similar performance > > for both rings (~9.9Mpps) (packed ring's performance can be > > lower, because it's more complicated in driver.) > > > > I think packed ring makes vhost PMD faster, but it doesn't make > > the driver faster. In packed ring, the ring is simplified, and > > the handling of...

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 06:32:35AM +0000, Xie, Huawei wrote: > On 9/9/2015 3:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 08:25:05AM +0000, Xie, Huawei wrote: > >> Hi: > >> > >> Recently I have done one virtio optimization proof of concept. The > >> optimization includes two parts: > >> 1) avail ring set with fixed descriptors

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 06:32:35AM +0000, Xie, Huawei wrote: > On 9/9/2015 3:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 08:25:05AM +0000, Xie, Huawei wrote: > >> Hi: > >> > >> Recently I have done one virtio optimization proof of concept. The > >> optimization includes two parts: > >> 1) avail ring set with fixed descriptors

...n asterisk install with a digium 4 port fxo card and cisco 7960 sip phones -- running on a compaq Pentium III (Coppermine) at 800Mhz 256KB cache and 1GB of ram. when a call comes in on zap/1-1 for example, the delay between when zap sees the line going to ring state, and when the desktop telephone rings can be as long as 7000 milliseconds (or about 3 or 4 rings on an ear piece). below is some of the log -- note 2 seconds to get from Ring Begin to In Use and a total of 7 seconds before the sip phone rings. anyway to speed this process up? cheers charles Apr 5 16:15:00 DEBUG[7010]: chan_zap.c...

Hi All, I was wondering what the status of distinctive ring support in Asterisk is? I had a google search & read and Mark Spencer wrote some support for it. Is distinctive ring different in every country or is it pretty standard? And for my final question, does the Wildcard FXO card support distinctive ring? Essentially what I'm trying to do is route incoming calls with ring #1 to,

Is it possible to allow distinctive rings work for FXS ports as well? I need a certain FXS extension to ring a distinctive double ring. I modified zapata.conf appropriately for dring1,dring2 and it just Seems to ignore my updates. Do distinctive rings only work for FXO ports? Paul Seniuk -------------- next part -------------- A...

Hi, I maintain a driver for a 10GbE nic which supports multiple hardware tx/rx rings. We can steer rx packets into rings using the "standard" NDIS6 Toeplitz hashing on TCP port numbers, IP addresses, etc. We can also steer packets based on MAC address. Would this NIC be considered to be capable of supporting crossbow? Also, can crossbow do things like steer outgoing p...

This adds micro-benchmarks useful for tuning virtio ring layouts. Three layouts are currently implemented: - virtio 0.9 compatible one - an experimental extension bypassing the ring index, polling ring itself instead - an experimental extension bypassing avail and used ring completely Typical use: sh run-on-all.sh perf stat -r 10 --log-fd 1 -- ./ring It doesn't depend on the kernel