Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "rikka".
Did you mean:
ikka
2015 Oct 01
3
Fwd: buildbot failure in LLVM on sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap
...le.com>, Erik Eckstein <eeckstein at apple.com>, Evgeniy Stepanov <
eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com>, Fiona Glaser <escha at apple.com>, Hal Finkel <
hfinkel at anl.gov>, Ivan Krasin <krasin at chromium.org>, Jingyue Wu <
jingyue at google.com>, Kaelyn Takata <rikka at google.com>, Kostya Serebryany <
kcc at google.com>, Michael Zolotukhin <mzolotukhin at apple.com>, Reid Kleckner <
rnk at google.com>, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com>, Sanjay Patel <
spatel at rotateright.com>, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com>
Cc: gkistanov...
2013 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Codifying (but not formalizing) the optimization levels in LLVM and Clang
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Kaelyn Uhrain <rikka at google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:30 PM, <dag at cray.com> wrote:
>
>> Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > minsizeopt
>> > sizeopt
>> > quickopt
>> > opt
>> > maxopt
>>
>>...
2013 Aug 30
1
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-amd64-openbsd
...nkel,jacksprat,jdennett,jholewinski,jimcownie,joerg,joey,jrose,jtsoftware,kevinqin,klimek,kremenek,kuba,labath,lattner,lhames,logan,lvoufo,majnemer,mgottesman,mkuper,mpopa,mren,mspencer,nadav,nicholas,nico,olesalscheider,papin_g,pcc,predmond,rafael,rdivacky,redstar,rengolin,resistor,revane,ributzka,rikka,rkotler,rlytton,rmitton,rnk,row,rsandifo,rsmith,rtrieu,rudkx,ruiu,samsonov,sbaranga,sbenza,sdt,sepavloff,shuxin_yang,silvas,stephenwlin,stoklund,sylvestre,tasiraj,timurrrr,tnorthover,tstellar,uweigand,venkatra,vmedic,void,whunt,wpan,wschmidt,ygao,yjiang
>
> BUILD FAILED: failed compile
>...
2013 Jan 14
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Codifying (but not formalizing) the optimization levels in LLVM and Clang
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:30 PM, <dag at cray.com> wrote:
> Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > minsizeopt
> > sizeopt
> > quickopt
> > opt
> > maxopt
>
> I prefer being consistent and putting "opt" at the end.
>
> I would still like something other than "opt" for the fourth one. "opt"
2013 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Codifying (but not formalizing) the optimization levels in LLVM and Clang
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> writes:
> minsizeopt
> sizeopt
> quickopt
> opt
> maxopt
I prefer being consistent and putting "opt" at the end.
I would still like something other than "opt" for the fourth one. "opt"
seems too generic given the other levels.
-David