search for: riegel

...;roo t","htmlos_login_password":"","desktoplogin":"","AESTIVACVNLIST":"htmlos _login_username"}} I am not sure what this means or how to proceed. Is there additional debugging techniques I could use. Thanks for any help, Terry Riegel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group...

On Tuesday 13 July 2010 19:48:25 you wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Torvald Riegel > > I thought that the layout of structs was supposed to be preserved (wrong > > assumption?). Otherwise, any ideas why this happens? > > It should be preserved in general; Is this a "should" or a "must"? Are there any cases in which structure layout must be...

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Torvald Riegel <torvald at se.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote: > On Tuesday 13 July 2010 19:48:25 you wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Torvald Riegel >> > I thought that the layout of structs was supposed to be preserved (wrong >> > assumption?). Otherwise, any ideas why this...

...he Wan side? (same as your post below)! I am using > Linux 2.2.13 > with ipchains and ipmasqadm. > > Thanks! > Dave Krusch > > ====================== > > NT logon with ipchains > > * Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 11:23:32 +0200 > * From: "Bernhard Riegel (sdm)" <Bernhard.Riegel@sdm.de> > * Subject: NT logon with ipchains > > did anyone try a domain logon from a NT client over IP-masquerading > (using kernel 2.2.5 and ipchains)? > > Setup: > > NT domain --- Linux Box --- NT Client > PDC...

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Torvald Riegel > <torvald at se.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote: >> On Tuesday 13 July 2010 19:48:25 you wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Torvald Riegel >>> > I thought that the layout of structs was supposed to be preserved (wrong >>> > assumption?). Otherwise...

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Andrew Lenharth <andrewl at lenharth.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Torvald Riegel >> <torvald at se.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote: >>> On Tuesday 13 July 2010 19:48:25 you wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Torvald Riegel >>>> > I thought that the layout of structs was supposed to be preserved (wrong >>>> > ass...

...s already setup Samba (2.0) to be a local master browser (without producing errors in the logfiles of the domain master browser), an example for smb.conf would be nice. Thank You for any suggestion. Bernhard -- _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ Bernhard Riegel mailto:bernhard.riegel@sdm.de

I'm hoping this turns into another case of 'knowing it works makes it happen.' I am involved with a unix clearcase installation which now needs to work with nt. We have clearcase 3.2.1 running on both the unix and nt side. Because we have checkin/checkout triggers hooked to some unix-side stuff, we need the unix views to be accessible from nt. Does anyone have direct experience

...e logfiles. Kerberos seams to work: I can do kinit USER@REALM and "net join ads" succeeded also. But I did the ADS-join BEFORE configuring winbind changing the /etc/nsswitch.conf and the /etc/pam.d/samba file according to the Samba3 winbind manpage. May this be the problem? -- Bernhard Riegel bernhard.riegel@sdm.de

On Wednesday 01 April 2009 20:01:09 Dan Gohman wrote: > On Apr 1, 2009, at 7:25 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote: > > On Wednesday 25 March 2009, Luke Dalessandro wrote: > >> You could encode this information as simple library function calls > >> and > >> then find them again in the generated LLVM IR. The client then just > >> needs a header declaring the funct...

..., Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Andrew Lenharth <andrewl at lenharth.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Torvald Riegel >>> <torvald at se.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote: >>>> On Tuesday 13 July 2010 19:48:25 you wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Torvald Riegel >>>>> > I thought that the layout of structs was supposed to be preserved (wrong >>&...

Hi, I recently looked quite some time for why poolalloc wouldn't transform calls to malloc() in my program, until I noticed that it handles calls to malloc() (eg, stdlib pass) -- but only transforms MallocInst's. Is there a general policy on how passes should behave? Should they handle both representations, is doing -raiseallocs the preferred way, or do we explicitely not want any

On Monday 17 December 2007, Christopher Lamb wrote: > On Dec 17, 2007, at 1:22 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote: > > Would it be possible to keep get() unchanged, with a default > > behaviour, plus > > a warning? Otherwise everybody (assuming everybody gets type void*) > > will > > have to update their LLVM passes, and either maintain two versions > > of the > &gt...

...ram S. Adve wrote: > Torvald, > > For what are you interested in poolalloc? I'm asking because we are > trying to decide how to prioritize work on it. Thanks, > > --Vikram > http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve > http://llvm.org > > On Oct 27, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I recently looked quite some time for why poolalloc wouldn't > > transform calls > > to malloc() in my program, until I noticed that it handles calls to > > malloc() > > (eg, stdlib pass) -- but only transforms MallocInst's. &...

...communities have a compiler background, so we would really like to get support from people that have a compiler background. We thank all the LLVM developers and contributors for creating a great compiler framework. Torvald [1] Pascal Felber and Christof Fetzer and Ulrich Müller and Torvald Riegel and Martin Süsskraut and Heiko Sturzrehm, Transactifying Applications using an Open Compiler Framework, TRANSACT, 2007

Torvald Riegel wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to see support for something like this. I have some comments, and I > think there is existing work that you can reuse. "reuse within the compiler." > "While the processor may spin and attempt the atomic operation more than once > b...

Hi, llvm-gcc of LLVM 2.5 seems to ignore function attributes of template functions. For example, it doesn't set the noinline attribute, and it doesn't warn on unknown attribute names. Is this known / intended behavior? Thanks, Torvald

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Torvald Riegel <torvald at se.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote: > Hi, > > attached is small program in which padding inside a struct is lost when using > llc, but is not lost when using llvm-gcc or gcc. In particular, padding is > missing after codegen with llc (see (1) below, LLVM 2.7, Linux x86_64)...

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Torvald Riegel > <torvald at se.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote: >> On Tuesday 13 July 2010 19:48:25 you wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Torvald Riegel >>> > I thought that the layout of structs was supposed to be preserved (wrong >>> > assumption?). Otherwise...

...e I have no control over the routers). > There will be multiple instances of the configuration on the network at any > given time. > > Thanks, > Dennis Boylan > dennis@lan.com -- _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ Bernhard Riegel mailto:bernhard.riegel@sdm.de _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/