search for: rids

I have a script that is adding about 16,000 users to my domain. While monitoring the script, I noticed that as soon as a user is added, 500 additional RID's are allocated from the RID Master Please see below the output of the "CN=RID Manager$,CN=System" and "CN=RID Set,CN=DC1,OU=Domain Controllers" containers between each user-add As you can see, in "CN=RID

On Thursday, 13 June 2019 00:41:09 PDT Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 13/06/2019 07:55, Alexey A Nikitin wrote: > > On Wednesday, 12 June 2019 13:07:56 PDT Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >>>> I think you mean 'RID' instead of 'SID' > >>> Yes, you're right. The Windows people seem to use the terms synonymously. > >> I cannot

...d >>>> # record 1 >>>> dn: DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx >>>> objectSid: S-1-5-21-3258148492-1502286889-3538134041 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb >>>> '(&(objectClass=rIDSet)(cn=RID Set))' rIDAllocationPool >>>> # record 1 >>>> dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx >>>> rIDAllocationPool: 2100-2599 >>>> >>>> # record 2 >>>> dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC02,OU=Domain Controllers...

...dan <d.jordan at gfd.de> wrote: > > > > > > Hello  Andrew and Rowland, > > > > here's the ldbsearch output from both domain controllers: > > > > > > dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb  > > '(&(objectClass=rIDSet)(cn=RID Set))' rIDNextRID > > # record 1 > > dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > > rIDNextRID: 1495 > > > > # record 2 > > dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC02,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > > rIDNextRID: 0 > > > &...

...king concept. I understand that SIDs are the numerical identification of a user for the Windows world. I understand that UIDs are the equivalent for the *nix world. But what the @$@! is a Relative IDentifier (RID)?!? On page 153 the command to map a windows group to a *nix group - no mention of RIDs. Then on 154 it is stressed that under no circumstances should your *nix groups or users trod on window's assigned RIDs for Domain Admins, Domian Users, et. all. Another example of groupmap - oh look it lists a RID? No mention as to where a RID comes from or can be viewed. Do they mean that...

...gt; .. > RidAllocationMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS > Settings,CN=LARKIN27,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site > -Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=micore,DC=us > ... > > > > Try running this on the DC: ldbsearch > > > -H/usr/local/samba/private/sa m.ldb '(objectClass=rIDSet)' dn > > > rIDNextRID > > It should should show the DN's of your DCs followed by the contents > > of the 'rIDNextRID' attributes. these should be '0' on all DC's > > except the RID master. > > > [root at larkin28 ~]# ldbsearch -H...

On Thursday, 13 June 2019 09:18:25 PDT Goetz, Patrick G via samba wrote: > On 6/13/19 10:48 AM, Alexey A Nikitin via samba wrote: > > According to the MS docs SID=('S-'+version+identifier authority value+domain or computer identifier+RID). The SIDs that don't contain RID are the special cases of Machine SID, Domain SID, Service SID, and some predefined universal well-known

Hi, If i have smbpasswd with: user1:1416:803A317873C24BBDAAD3B435B51404EE:2DF2CB1538FE718DE034707A521AA893: [U ]:LCT-1221415636: and i do: pdbedit -i smbpasswd:file And SID for domain SERVER is: S-1-5-21-1454471165-2146950999-672003340 How does samba generate the rid part of that users sid? [root@server samba]# pdbedit -L -v user1 User SID:

Hi the list, I have a samba 2.2.8a running with ldap authentication. but when I'm browsing the domain account I can see all the users but only 2 groups : Domain Admins and Domain users... How can I add all my other groups on the domain too ? [root@lnxbxl root]# rpcclient //SAMBA-FS -U administrator -c "enumdomgroups" Password: cmd = enumdomgroups group:[Domain Admins]

I've recently upgraded from a 3.0.4 (or 3.0.6, I don't remember) to Samba 3.0.10 on a FreeBSD 5.2.1 system and now I'm having problems with winbind. It seems to run fine for a while, but then it hangs and starts taking a lot of CPU time (80-90% while idling), eventually it dumps core. I commented out the 'client use spnego' line because that caused winbindd to hang

...CN=NTDS >>> Settings,CN=LARKIN27,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site >>> -Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=micore,DC=us >>> ... >>> >>>>> Try running this on the DC: ldbsearch >>>>> -H/usr/local/samba/private/sa m.ldb '(objectClass=rIDSet)' dn >>>>> rIDNextRID >>>> It should should show the DN's of your DCs followed by the contents >>>> of the 'rIDNextRID' attributes. these should be '0' on all DC's >>>> except the RID master. >>> >>>...

On Wednesday, 12 June 2019 13:07:56 PDT Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >> I think you mean 'RID' instead of 'SID' > > > Yes, you're right. The Windows people seem to use the terms synonymously. > I cannot help that, the SID identifies the domain and the RID is > appended to the end of the SID and identifies the object (user, > group,computer

...b  > > '(objectClass=domain)' objectSid > > # record 1 > > dn: DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > > objectSid: S-1-5-21-3258148492-1502286889-3538134041 > > > > > > > > dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb  > > '(&(objectClass=rIDSet)(cn=RID Set))' rIDAllocationPool > > # record 1 > > dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > > rIDAllocationPool: 2100-2599 > > > > # record 2 > > dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC02,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > > rIDAllocatio...

...ecking sAMAccountName ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - LDAP error 53 LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM - <00002035: ../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/ridalloc.c:517: No RID Set DN - Failed to add RID Set CN=RID Set,CN=EXISTING-DC,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=mydomain,DC=org - objectclass: object class 'rIDSet' is system-only, rejecting creation of 'CN=RID Set,CN=EXISTING-DC,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=mydomain,DC=org'!> <> File "/usr/local/samba/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File "/us...

Hello list, I have a few questions to ask... I am about to migrate from Samba 2 to 3 (3.5.9). I am going to use LDAP as backend in the future and came across something I don't understand. As far as I know the 'old' way to generate RIDs for users is to take their uidnumber, multiply it by two and add 1000. For computer accounts it would be 1001 instead of 1000. I am now trying to figure out how this works with 3.5.9 and ldapsam and if it is possible to re-enable the old behaviour. The only thing I could find was this: http://samb...

> so I think ADS is not the best option in my case. > From your explanation I'm in favour of RID backend as it seems more >stable because of the static setup. Your best options is : Use ADS, with backend RID. If you have 1 DC and (or 1 extra member server ) than RID is you best option, no hassle uid/gid and RFC2307 things.. but beware if you do things on linux.. than you can

You are using idmap module rid for your domain. I think getent passwd could not resolve anything because of your id range. I would try a range of 1000 (one thousand)-99999 and see what happens. New users in AD start with a rid of 1000. Well known Users like administrator got their rid starting in the 500 range. You should think of using rfc2307. Regards Tim Am 12. Februar 2015 10:51:47 MEZ,

...(wcache_fetch_ndr) Entry has timed out [2018/11/13 23:01:21.746769, 1, pid=5170, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=rpc_parse] ../librpc/ndr/ndr.c:471(ndr_print_function_debug) wbint_QueryUserRidList: struct wbint_QueryUserRidList out: struct wbint_QueryUserRidList rids : * rids: struct wbint_RidArray num_rids : 0x0000001f (31) rids: ARRAY(31) rids : 0x000004b9 (1209) rids : 0x...

I'm reading the man page for idmap_rid over and over and I can't understand it. I think it needs a rewrite so a normal user can understand. Using a practical example. Step 1: determine the highest UID in use for your /etc/passwd file (can we assume everyone has a passwd file?) Step 2: I don't know... Optionally at this point, document how to plug that into the formula RID = ID +

Hi, We're having some trouble with detection of a couple of Sil3124 SATA controller cards on newer motherboard and processor combos. Specifically, we're running a Supermicro X9SCM-F motherboard (latest BIOS) and Intel E3-1220v2 CPU. What we're seeing: - Syba Sil3124 PCIe cards are only being detected when installed in PCIe Slot 4 -- The motherboard documentation shows that this