search for: ridallocationpool

...lease see below the output of the "CN=RID Manager$,CN=System" and "CN=RID Set,CN=DC1,OU=Domain Controllers" containers between each user-add As you can see, in "CN=RID Set,CN=DC1,OU=Domain Controllers" rIDNextRID increments by one between each user, but there is a new rIDAllocationPool each time. And to match that, inside of the "CN=RID Manager$,CN=System" container the rIDAvailablePool gets depleted by 500 between each new user. Is this normal behavior, or a bug? I thought the DC only requests 500 additional RID's when it was close to being depleted - not on eac...

...d 1 >>>> dn: DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx >>>> objectSid: S-1-5-21-3258148492-1502286889-3538134041 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb >>>> '(&(objectClass=rIDSet)(cn=RID Set))' rIDAllocationPool >>>> # record 1 >>>> dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx >>>> rIDAllocationPool: 2100-2599 >>>> >>>> # record 2 >>>> dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC02,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx >>>> rID...

...trollers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > > rIDNextRID: 1716 > > > > > > hope that helps > > > > Daniel > Well yes an no ;-) > > You posted this: > > dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb > '(&(objectClass=rIDSet)(cn=RID Set))' rIDAllocationPool > # record 1 > dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > rIDAllocationPool: 2100-2599 > > # record 2 > dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC02,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > rIDAllocationPool: 1600-2099 > > So how has 'rIDNextRID' been set to ...

dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb '(objectClass=domain)' objectSid # record 1 dn: DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx objectSid: S-1-5-21-3258148492-1502286889-3538134041 dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb '(&(objectClass=rIDSet)(cn=RID Set))' rIDAllocationPool # record 1 dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx rIDAllocationPool: 2100-2599 # record 2 dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC02,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx rIDAllocationPool: 1600-2099 Daniel Am 26.09.18 um 15:15 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 1...

...02,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx >> rIDNextRID: 1716 >> >> >> hope that helps >> >> Daniel > Well yes an no ;-) > > You posted this: > > dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb '(&(objectClass=rIDSet)(cn=RID Set))' rIDAllocationPool > # record 1 > dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > rIDAllocationPool: 2100-2599 > > # record 2 > dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC02,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > rIDAllocationPool: 1600-2099 > > So how has 'rIDNextRID' been set to '...

...lass=domain)' objectSid > > # record 1 > > dn: DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > > objectSid: S-1-5-21-3258148492-1502286889-3538134041 > > > > > > > > dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb  > > '(&(objectClass=rIDSet)(cn=RID Set))' rIDAllocationPool > > # record 1 > > dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > > rIDAllocationPool: 2100-2599 > > > > # record 2 > > dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC02,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > > rIDAllocationPool: 1600-2099 > Strange, you orig...

Am 25.09.18 um 14:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:12:18 +0200 > Daniel Jordan <d.jordan at gfd.de> wrote: > >>>>>>>> dc01:~# samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs >>>>>>>> Checking 4503 objects >>>>>>>> SID S-1-5-21-3258148492-1502286889-3538134041-1601 for >>>>>>>>

...t; # record 1 > > > dn: DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > > > objectSid: S-1-5-21-3258148492-1502286889-3538134041 > > > > > > > > > > > > dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb  > > > '(&(objectClass=rIDSet)(cn=RID Set))' rIDAllocationPool > > > # record 1 > > > dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > > > rIDAllocationPool: 2100-2599 > > > > > > # record 2 > > > dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC02,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx > > > rIDAllocationPoo...

On 17/05/16 12:11, ash-samba at comtek.co.uk wrote: > >> G'Day, >> >> This is a serious situation. What it means is that the nextRid value >> for that DC points at a user account that already exists, so when we >> go to create it, the create fails. > I've just looked at the LDAP output, and nextRid is 1000 for both dn: >

...you tried to add user because this is the DC which refused to use the RID > pool it was given because RidNextRid contains a value too low compared to > already given RID. > I did searched on my FSMO owner for " CN=RID Set" and I receive one answer > per DC. Each with different rIDAllocationPool of course. > > I believe I read something here about something not replicated (no time to > re-read the whole thread carefully enough, sorry), if you change rIDNextRID > by hand just check on others DC your change is replicated, to keep a DB > consistent. I expect it is replicated, t...

27.06.2016 18:45, mathias dufresne: > Perhaps you don't have yet duplicate objectSid as that's not supposed to be > possible. > Rather than scripting something to look for objectSid used twice I would > start with dbcheck and other tools to verify that your database is > consistent and identical on all servers. [root at pdc ~]# samba-tool dbcheck Checking 3346 objects

...symbols is 2001, and last assigned RID is 2001: > > [root at pdc ~]# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb CN="RID Set" > # record 3 > dn: CN=RID Set,CN=PDC,OU=Domain Controllers,... > rIDNextRID: 2001 > rIDPreviousAllocationPool: 1600-2099 > rIDUsedPool: 1 > rIDAllocationPool: 2600-3099 > > https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/305475 > RidNextRid The RID that was assigned to the last security principal that > was created on the local domain controller. > RidPreviousAllocationPool The pool from which RIDs are currently taken > RidAllocationPool Each d...

...; objectClass: rIDSet > cn: RID Set > instanceType: 4 > whenCreated: 20141223180132.0Z > whenChanged: 20141223180132.0Z > uSNCreated: 12146 > uSNChanged: 12146 > showInAdvancedViewOnly: TRUE > name: RID Set > objectGUID: b2f1c43e-4bd7-46dd-bdd8-6cc31f259655 > rIDAllocationPool: 7100-7599 > rIDUsedPool: 0 > objectCategory: CN=RID-Set,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=chester-dc,DC=example, > DC=com > rIDPreviousAllocationPool: 7100-7599 > rIDNextRID: 7126 > distinguishedName: CN=RID Set,CN=ALASKA,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=chester-dc,DC > =exampl...

...had a small peak at your patch. This also applies to samba 4.8.5? Now, basicly, i dont know anythis what that patch is doing, im not a coder, i can read it a bit. But if did read it correct, its about rID pool alloctions where rID = 0 ? Like this: (dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC2,OU=Domain Controllers,) rIDAllocationPool: 2100-2599 rIDPreviousAllocationPool: 0-0 rIDUsedPool: 0 rIDNextRID: 0 And on DC1 i see : rIDAllocationPool: 2600-3099 rIDPreviousAllocationPool: 2600-3099 rIDUsedPool: 1 whenChanged: 20161220102428.0Z uSNChanged: 73513 rIDNextRID: 2651 Because then i can confirm this happens also in Samba 4.8.5...

...-2001 (it is record for computer) Last symbols is 2001, and last assigned RID is 2001: [root at pdc ~]# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb CN="RID Set" # record 3 dn: CN=RID Set,CN=PDC,OU=Domain Controllers,... rIDNextRID: 2001 rIDPreviousAllocationPool: 1600-2099 rIDUsedPool: 1 rIDAllocationPool: 2600-3099 https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/305475 RidNextRid The RID that was assigned to the last security principal that was created on the local domain controller. RidPreviousAllocationPool The pool from which RIDs are currently taken RidAllocationPool Each domain controller has two pool...

...symbols is 2001, and last assigned RID is 2001: > > [root at pdc ~]# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb CN="RID Set" > # record 3 > dn: CN=RID Set,CN=PDC,OU=Domain Controllers,... > rIDNextRID: 2001 > rIDPreviousAllocationPool: 1600-2099 > rIDUsedPool: 1 > rIDAllocationPool: 2600-3099 > > https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/305475 > RidNextRid The RID that was assigned to the last security principal that > was created on the local domain controller. > RidPreviousAllocationPool The pool from which RIDs are currently taken > RidAllocationPool Each d...

...ed by user request: OutboundSecureChannels Test omitted by user request: Replications Starting test: RidManager * Available RID Pool for the Domain is 62343 to 1073741823 * LARKIN27.micore.us is the RID Master * DsBind with RID Master was successful * rIDAllocationPool is 56343 to 56842 * rIDPreviousAllocationPool is 56343 to 56842 * rIDNextRID: 56462 ......................... LARKIN26 passed test RidManager Test omitted by user request: Services Test omitted by user request: SystemLog Test omitted by user request: Top...

...change it on the DC you tried to add user because this is the DC which refused to use the RID pool it was given because RidNextRid contains a value too low compared to already given RID. I did searched on my FSMO owner for " CN=RID Set" and I receive one answer per DC. Each with different rIDAllocationPool of course. I believe I read something here about something not replicated (no time to re-read the whole thread carefully enough, sorry), if you change rIDNextRID by hand just check on others DC your change is replicated, to keep a DB consistent. I expect it is replicated, that would be a simple wa...

Hi all, I'm having a problems with leaving and joining a client to the domain. I'm using samba-4.1.4 as an AD server. When I join and leave and join and leave after a while this error comes up: Failed to join domain: failed to join domain 'AIIAS' over rpc: NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT And when I look at the logs it says: Failed to re-index objectSid in

On 9/19/2016 1:37 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:19:08 +0200 > Achim Gottinger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> Am 19.09.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Achim Gottinger via samba: >>> >>> Am 19.09.2016 um 18:21 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>>> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:57:38 -0400 >>>> Adam