Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "rhythembox".
2019 Nov 03
4
Recent inability to view long filenames stored with scp via samba mount
...mount.cifs to bring up these mounts.
For a couple of special cases, I use scp to transfer files between the server and workstation. Special characters in filenames give sending them over the Samba mount trouble, so that is one case I
have used scp in place of using the Samba mount.
To back up my Rhythembox music I use scp. I loaded some more music to Rhythembox yesterday, so remembered to back up Rhythembox to the server this morning. The scp command works flawlessly as ever.
$ bin/rsync_ldslnx01rhythmbox.sh
sending incremental file list
sent 268 bytes received 15 bytes 188.67 bytes/sec
total siz...
2019 Nov 04
0
Recent inability to view long filenames stored with scp via samba mount
...s.
>
> For a couple of special cases, I use scp to transfer files between the
> server and workstation. Special characters in filenames give sending them
> over the Samba mount trouble, so that is one case I have used scp in place
> of using the Samba mount.
>
> To back up my Rhythembox music I use scp. I loaded some more music to Rhythembox yesterday, so remembered to back up Rhythembox to the server this morning. The scp command works flawlessly as ever.
>
> $ bin/rsync_ldslnx01rhythmbox.sh
> sending incremental file list
>
> sent 268 bytes received 15 bytes 1...
2019 Nov 03
0
Recent inability to view long filenames stored with scp via samba mount
....
>
> For a couple of special cases, I use scp to transfer files between the
> server and workstation. Special characters in filenames give sending
> them over the Samba mount trouble, so that is one case I have used scp
> in place of using the Samba mount.
>
> To back up my Rhythembox music I use scp. I loaded some more music to
> Rhythembox yesterday, so remembered to back up Rhythembox to the
> server this morning. The scp command works flawlessly as ever.
>
> $ bin/rsync_ldslnx01rhythmbox.sh
> sending incremental file list
>
> sent 268 bytes? received 1...