search for: rhrl

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "rhrl".

Did you mean: rhel
2018 Jul 29
3
[PATCH] file: Zero support for block devices and NFS 4.2
If we may not trim, we tried ZERO_RANGE, but this is not well supported yet, for example it is not available on NFS 4.2. ZERO_RANGE and PUNCH_HOLE are supported now on block devices, but not on RHRL 7, so we fallback to slow manual zeroing there. Change the logic to support block devices on RHEL 7, and file systems that do not support ZERO_RANGE. The new logic: - If we may trim, try PUNCH_HOLE - If we can zero range, Try ZERO_RANGE - If we can punch hole and fallocate, try fallocate(PUNCH_HO...
2018 Jul 30
0
Re: [PATCH] file: Zero support for block devices and NFS 4.2
On 07/29/2018 07:04 AM, Nir Soffer wrote: > If we may not trim, we tried ZERO_RANGE, but this is not well supported > yet, for example it is not available on NFS 4.2. ZERO_RANGE and > PUNCH_HOLE are supported now on block devices, but not on RHRL 7, so we > fallback to slow manual zeroing there. > > Change the logic to support block devices on RHEL 7, and file systems > that do not support ZERO_RANGE. > > The new logic: > - If we may trim, try PUNCH_HOLE > - If we can zero range, Try ZERO_RANGE > - If we can pun...
2018 Aug 02
0
[PATCH] file: Zero support for block devices and NFS 4.2
If we may not trim, we tried ZERO_RANGE, but this is not well supported yet, for example it is not available on NFS 4.2. ZERO_RANGE and PUNCH_HOLE are supported now on block devices, but not on RHRL 7, so we fallback to slow manual zeroing there. Change the logic to support block devices on RHEL 7, and file systems that do not support ZERO_RANGE. The new logic: - If we may trim, try PUNCH_HOLE - If we can zero range, Try ZERO_RANGE - If we can punch hole and fallocate, try fallocate(PUNCH_HO...
2018 Aug 02
10
[PATCH 0/3] file: Zero for block devices and older file systems
This is the second version to support efficient zero for block devices on older kernels (e.g. RHEL 7.5), and file systems that do not support yet FALLOC_FS_ZERO_RANGE (e.g. NFS 4.2). Changes since v1: - Split to smaller patches - Skip linux only includes on other systems - Skip code using BLKZEROOUT if the macro is not defined - Try BLKZEROOUT only if the offset and count are aligned to device