search for: rhrh0ymjexnht2uipz2j

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "rhrh0ymjexnht2uipz2j".

2015 Apr 18
0
Skip based on checksum not worked as expected when using with complex filter rules.
...rium.net (personal) Web page: http://www.sanitarium.net/ PGP public key available on web site. ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlUx4A4ACgkQVKC1jlbQAQeXkwCg3PV/RHRH0YmJexnhT2UipZ2j NPsAnA1CDtilemMOagzjA5nPV+8/vW+k =6FVH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2015 Apr 18
2
Skip based on checksum not worked as expected when using with complex filter rules.
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 23:45:42 -0400, Kevin Korb wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > So, I am assuming that without --itemize-changes you couldn't tell the > difference between "I am transferring a file" and "I am fixing the > timestamp on a file". > > Even if I am right, you are probably still mis-using --checksum. When