search for: rh4.2

Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "rh4.2".

1999 Nov 21
1
openssh 1.2pre13 on Linux/i386 RH4.2 problems
Can't compile sshd.c because of pam errors. The errors are attached below, and I apologize for the >75 chars a line. RH4.2, with the latest updates, runs pam-0.57-5. I could upgrade PAM from source, but I'd probably break other programs. gcc -g -O2 -Wall -I/usr/local/ssl/include -DETCDIR=\"/etc/ssh\" -DSSH_PROGRAM=\"/usr/bin/ssh\"
2006 Mar 31
1
Metamail
Hi all, I''m setting up Hylafax with Centos4.2. Seems like it requires a package called metamail. I visited rpmfind.net but confused which package should I choose. There are one for RH4.2, RHEL AS 2.1. Curiously, there''s none for FC. Thanks. -- Fajar Priyanto | Reg''d Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial http://linux2.arinet.org 17:11:39 up 6:15, 2.6.15-1.1830_FC4
2002 Aug 25
2
2 root disks sdb1,sdc1; if set "root=/dev/sdc1", mtab lies saying sdb1 is root!?
I have 2 SCSI disks each w/a RH 7.3 ext3 root filesystem: /dev/sdb1, and /dev/sdc1. /dev/sda1 is an old RH4.2 root filesystem. (sdb1 was created as an image of sdc1 using dd.) I have no problem booting from a SYSLINUX 1.52 floppy with SYSLINUX.CFG containing "append initrd=initrd.img root=/dev/sdb1". When I alter SYSLINUX.CFG with: "append initrd=initrd.img root=/dev/sdc1".
2007 May 10
3
New Centos User - Yum Repositories Question
I've been using Red Hat and its derivatives since RH4.2. I use Fedora Core 6 for all of my desktop machines, but I decided to go for Centos 5 for my new colo web server. So I've just taken delivery of a new Centos 5 virtual server from Bytemark (http://bytemark.co.uk/) and I'm trying to get it set up with all the RPMs that I'm used to from FC6. As I understand it, the Centos
1998 May 08
0
R-beta: problems compiling R 0.61.2 on silicon graphics
Hi Computing services here at QUT are trying to compile R0.61.2 for me on a silicon graphics computer running IRIX Release 6.2 IP25 and gcc. %gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/gnu/lib/gcc-lib/mips-sgi-irix5.3/2.7.2.2/specs gcc version 2.7.2.2 %perl -v This is perl, version 5.004_04 built for irix Basically, it was impossible for me even to get R configured although under Linux RH4.2 and DEC ALPHA
1998 May 11
0
CIFS based NT Authentication for PAM (pam_smb-1.0)
Version 1.0 of my CIFS based NT authentication system for PAM is available from http://www.csn.ul.ie/~airlied/pam_smb/pam_smb-1.0.tar.gz or ftp://ftp.csn.ul.ie/pub/linux/pam/pam_smb/pam_smb-1.0.tar.gz This release has now gotten GNU configure support and should work reliably on Linux RH4.2, RH 5.0 and Solaris 2.6.... If anyone has another platform with PAM could they try it out ... It is also
1998 Aug 06
0
SAMBA digest 1770 (new user problem)
When the world was young, SaM <SamAndMichelle@hotmail.com> had some trouble with the samba setup: Subject: SAMBA digest 1770 Date sent: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 00:31:20 +1000 > I'm a new Samba/Linux user. I"ve got my computer to network between a > Linux Redhat 5.1 computer and a Windows95B computer. The computers can > ping each other and i've setup IP
1997 Sep 03
0
Sysklogd''s -r option
sysklogd in RH4.2 always opens a UDP listen socket, even when -r is not specified on the command line. It doesn''t check the file descriptor when -r is off though, but the behaviour still irritates the system administrator greatly (see also the recent bugtraq messages about this). Here is a patch to fix this: --- sysklogd-1.3/syslogd.c-o Wed Sep 3 22:19:26 1997 +++
1999 Aug 19
1
dptr_create: returned 9: Error - all new dirptrs in use ?
Hi, I get this error message in the log for a Win98 client which is regularly scanning a directory on the share. When this happens the client no longer can access any data in the shares (security=share), only the toplevel directory structure of a share is still accessible. This seems to be a new problem in 2.0.5/6pre (not sure if it already happened for 2.0.4). Any hints? Franz. Platform:
1998 Aug 05
6
Problem with TCP_wrappers
Hi, I''m running into something weird here. I''m using RH5.1 with tcp_wrappers 7.6. The syntax for hosts.allow and hosts.deny is: <service list> : <access list> [ : <shell_command> ] Everything works when I _don''t_ use the shell_command. I used the _exact_ line as in the man-pages utilising "safe_finger" (comes with tcp_wrappers), tcpdchk
1999 Jul 22
3
security level flag...
my customer wants to export both users' home directories and a public one; as far as the home dirs are concerned, my customer wants the system asks for user's login & password before providing access to grant privacy but wants no password for the public one: is this possible? I tried setting security mode to user (security = user) in the global settings thinkig this would make the
1999 Jul 20
7
too many open files
Please answer if anybody has solved this problem: [1999/07/19 20:59:41, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 246 are available. Thanks in advance.
1998 May 08
4
Lightning fast attacks?
RH4.2 Linux Intel Last night I got three of these log messages: Two in a row, one a bit later. May 8 00:35:15 osg-gw imapd[4307]: warning: can''t get client address: Connectio n reset by peer May 8 00:35:15 osg-gw imapd[4307]: refused connect from unknown Now, I have imapd blocked to non-local users using tcpd wrappers, so tcpd is trying to find the address of the remote machine (all
1999 Jul 16
9
SWAT issue
I have had a RH5.2 server running Samba up for a long time. I upgraded to Mandrake 6.0. It broke Samba, so I reinstalled using the RPM on the CD. Samba works just fine, but SWAT will not! If I try to start it manually (/usr/sbin/swat) it just hangs. In /etc/services I have a line like this: swat 901/tcp In /etc/inetd.conf I have: swat stream tcp nowait.400 root
1998 Jun 08
27
Services not required?
I''m in the process of locking down as much of my systems here as possible as to available ports. I am down to only a handful but am not sure how much of a security risk they pose and was wondering if anyone here might be able to comment, or suggest secure versions to run: 21/FTP (WU-ftpd v2.4.2 BETA 14) 22/SSH (1.22) 23/TELNET (Netkit 0.09) 25/SMTP (Sendmail
1998 Aug 02
0
ipportfw - security
Hi Are there any known security holes or necessary precautions in using port forwarding with ipportfw? I'm planning on forwarding ports from an outer firewall/router (connected to the Internet) to a host in the DMZ, then on from the DMZ host to the inner firewall, and finally from the inner firewall to some host on the inside. Thanks, Jens jph@strengur.is From mail@mail.redhat.com Wed