search for: rfx

Ah ah, the demo effect... just after I said I did not have much issues with repos... ^_^ A collegue installed some packages (for perconna) and since then a server insists on replacing 2 base packages with 2 rfx packages, even when I gave a lower priority to rfx... Installed: perl-IO-Compress-Base-2.020-127.el6.x86_64 Installed: 1:perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.020-127.el6.x86_64 Installed: perl-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.020-127.el6.x86_64 Installed: perl-Compress-Zlib-2.020-127.el6.x86_64 Installed: perl-HTML-Tagset-...

...t;> repositories I have enabled? > > can you run in a shell window, > > sudo yum check-update > > and paste the output here ? > > otherwise we'd just be guessing whats going on. > OK, here ya go -- Obsoleting Packages perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras perl-Compress-Zlib.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras perl-IO-Compress-Base.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates perl-IO-Com...

...d tcp_wrappers.x86_64 7.6-40.7.el5 installed nfs-utils-lib.i386 1.0.8-7.6.el5 base nfs-utils-lib-devel.i386 1.0.8-7.6.el5 base nfs-utils-lib-devel.x86_64 1.0.8-7.6.el5 base tcp_wrappers-devel.x86_64 7.6-57.el5.rfx rpmforge-extras tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el5.rfx rpmforge-extras # yum update ... 132 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: tcp_wrappers f...

...ower priority to repoforge extra... Any idea how come I ran into this issue...? The question is more about the yum priorities than repoforge. ... 1743 packages excluded due to repository priority protections ... --> Running transaction check ---> Package perl-rrdtool.x86_64 0:1.4.5-1.el6.rfx will be obsoleting --> Processing Dependency: rrdtool = 1.4.5 for package: perl-rrdtool-1.4.5-1.el6.rfx.x86_64 ---> Package rrdtool-perl.x86_64 0:1.3.8-6.el6 will be obsoleted --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: perl-rrdtool-1.4.5-1.el6.rfx.x86_64 (rpmforge-extras) ?????????...

...mirror.hmc.edu * rpmforge-testing: mirror.hmc.edu * updates: centos.mirror.lstn.net Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package perl-Compress-Zlib.i686 0:2.020-131.el6_4 will be obsoleted ---> Package perl-IO-Compress.noarch 0:2.052-1.el6.rfx will be obsoleting --> Processing Dependency: perl(Compress::Raw::Bzip2) = 2.052 for package: perl-IO-Compress-2.052-1.el6.rfx.noarch --> Processing Dependency: perl(Compress::Raw::Zlib) = 2.052 for package: perl-IO-Compress-2.052-1.el6.rfx.noarch ---> Package perl-IO-Compress-Base.i686...

...-match, but all my attempts to sort it out have failed, so I need help, please. The current state is Skipping filters plugin, no data --> Running transaction check ---> Package perl-Compress-Zlib.x86_64 0:2.020-119.el6 will be obsoleted ---> Package perl-IO-Compress.noarch 0:2.037-1.el6.rfx will be obsoleting --> Processing Dependency: perl(Compress::Raw::Zlib) = 2.037 for package: perl-IO-Compress-2.037-1.el6.rfx.noarch ---> Package perl-IO-Compress-Base.x86_64 0:2.020-119.el6 will be obsoleted ---> Package perl-IO-Compress-Zlib.x86_64 0:2.020-119.el6 will be obsoleted --&g...

I'm on RHES 4.x I downloaded 2 dovecot RPM packages from http://packages.sw.be/dovecot/ dovecot-1.0.13-1.el4.rfx.i386.rpm 13-Nov-2010 22:15 1.8M RHEL4 and CentOS-4 x86 32bit and dovecot-0.99.13-1.2.el4.test.i386.rpm 21-Feb-2005 16:57 693K RHEL4 and CentOS-4 x86 32bit The first rpm fails with error below : # rpm -i ./dovecot-1.0.13-1.el4.rfx.i386.rpm warning: ./dovecot-1.0.13-1.el4.rfx.i386.rpm...

On 07/02/2015 03:11 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/1/2015 2:35 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> OK, here ya go -- >> >> Obsoleting Packages >> >> perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras >> perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates >> perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras >> perl-Compress-Zlib.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates >> perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras >> perl-IO-Compress-Bas...

On 7/1/2015 2:35 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > OK, here ya go -- > > Obsoleting Packages > > perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras > perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates > perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras > perl-Compress-Zlib.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates > perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras > perl-IO-Compress-Base.i686 2.021-136.el6...

...ty=6 gpgcheck=1 enabled=0 [contrib] priority=15 [rpmforge] priority = 2 enabled = 0 [rpmforge-extras] priority = 2 enabled = 0 [epel] priority=5 enabled=0 [sogo-rhel5] enabled=0 priority=3 but I got: ... perl-AnyEvent-5.340-1.el5.rfx.x86_64 from rpmforge-extras has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: perl(Net::SSLeay) >= 1.33 is needed by package perl-AnyEvent-5.340-1.el5.rfx.x86_64 (rpmforge-extras) Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Net::SSLeay) >= 1.33 is needed by package perl-AnyEvent-5.340-1.el5.rfx.x8...

My Update Applet keeps giving me messages to install an update to a package I do not have installed. To make matters more confusing, when I actually try to install the package it wants to update, there is a problem with the installation. Any tips on how to resolve this? Is this somehow caused by the repositories I have enabled? -- -------------------------------------------- MzK "We can

...803 (%build) And I'm hoping if I share with you the spec file that I'm using, I might be able to get some help with this. I am not sure where the problem is. Here's the spec file I'm using: # Authority: dag # Upstream: Brad Fitzpatrick <brad$danga,com> ### perl-AnyEvent is rfx on EL5, and so memcached must be as well %{?el5:# Tag: rfx} ### EL6 ships with memcached-1.4.4-3.el6 %{?el6:# Tag: rfx} %ifarch %{ix86} %define build_64bit --disable-64bit %else %define build_64bit --enable-64bit %endif Summary: Distributed memory object caching system Name: memcached Version: 1....

...g the version of Spam Assassin on my CentOS 5 mail server. The current version, 3.3.1-4.el5 (stock RHEL version), has been 'leaking' recently. I suspect I need some newer match rules to detect some of the newer flavors of spam. I see that in rpmforge's extras repo is version 3.3.2-4.el5.rfx -- is this version worth installing? Are there even newer versions either available for CentOS 5 (or buildable under CentOS 5)? Or is there a collection of match rules available for the newer flavors of spam than can just be dropped into /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf? I am not ready just yet to...

...4(96) AHRARNT(104) CACBINDINGPROTEIN(149) T3R(167) HLF(191) RPA2     STAT4(57) HEB(251) TAF12     PAX3(53) YY1(92) BRCA(99) GLI(101) EIF3I     NERF(10) P300(10) TRAPPC3     HIC1(3) PAX5(17) PAX5(110) NRF1(119) HIC1(122) TRAPPC3     EGR(26) ZNF219(27) SP3(32) EGR(32) NFKAPPAB65(89) NFKAPPAB(89) RFX(121) ZTA(168) NDUFS5     WHN(14) ATF(57) EGR3(59) PAX5(99) SF1(108) NRSE(146) TIE1     NRSE(129) I would like to test the 2nd column (each value has letters followed by numbers in brackets) here for enrichment via fisher.test. To that end I am trying to create two factors made up of column 1 (...

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Mark <mhullrich at gmail.com> wrote: > I have an old version of rkhunter installed on my CentOS 5 machine, > one I got from rpmforge. > > In my most recent attempts to update this, I get the following errors in yum: > : > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > perl-AnyEvent-5.240-1.el5.rf.noarch from rpmforge has depsolving problems >

...ot at lists.wgwh.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:00:53 +0800 > sunhux G <sunhux at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm on RHES 4.x > > > > I downloaded 2 dovecot RPM packages from > > http://packages.sw.be/dovecot/ > > > > dovecot-1.0.13-1.el4.rfx.i386.rpm 13-Nov-2010 22:15 1.8M > > RHEL4 and CentOS-4 x86 32bit > > and > > dovecot-0.99.13-1.2.el4.test.i386.rpm 21-Feb-2005 16:57 693K > > RHEL4 and CentOS-4 x86 32bit > > > > [...] > >Q1: > >Is the test version rpm of dovecot reliabl...

Having some issues with ldap logins. I am using Centos 5,dovecot-1.0.13-1.el5.rfx and openldap-servers-2.3.43-25.el5_8.1 Trying to get this to work with the SoGo interface. First I converted all my standard system users to ldap using the openldap-tools. This worked fine, however when a user changes there password they can no longer see there email. If they change it back to the...

Migrated a 1.0.2 server to 2.0.16 (same old box). IMAP seems working Ok. POP3 give problems with some clients (Outlook 2010 and Thunderbird reported). Seems authentication problem Below my doveconf -n (debug enbled, but no answer found to the problems) Any hints? Thanks, P. # doveconf -n # 2.0.16: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf doveconf: Warning: NOTE: You can get a new clean config file with:

...> > server. The current version, 3.3.1-4.el5 (stock RHEL version), has been > > 'leaking' recently. I suspect I need some newer match rules to detect some > > of > > the newer flavors of spam. I see that in rpmforge's extras repo is version > > 3.3.2-4.el5.rfx -- is this version worth installing? Are there even newer > > versions either available for CentOS 5 (or buildable under CentOS 5)? Or is > > there a collection of match rules available for the newer flavors of spam > > than > > can just be dropped into /etc/mail/spamassassi...

...on my CentOS 5 > mail > server. The current version, 3.3.1-4.el5 (stock RHEL version), has been > 'leaking' recently. I suspect I need some newer match rules to detect some > of > the newer flavors of spam. I see that in rpmforge's extras repo is version > 3.3.2-4.el5.rfx -- is this version worth installing? Are there even newer > versions either available for CentOS 5 (or buildable under CentOS 5)? Or is > there a collection of match rules available for the newer flavors of spam > than > can just be dropped into /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf? > &gt...