Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "rfc791".
Did you mean:
rfc7919
2011 Feb 18
1
Code review request: Drop obsolete RFC-791 markings for QoS markings
Here's the bug and proposed patch. It's pretty trivial.
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1856
Quoting RFC-2474:
A replacement header field, called the DS field, is defined, which is intended to supersede the existing definitions of the IPv4 TOS octet [RFC791] and the IPv6 Traffic Class octet [IPv6]. [...] The structure of the DS field shown above is incompatible with the existing definition of the IPv4 TOS octet in [RFC791].
and:
No attempt is made to maintain backwards compatibility with the "DTR" or TOS bits of the IPv4 TOS octet, as...
2011 Feb 09
6
[Bug 1856] New: Wrong QoS naming and obsolete defaults
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1856
Summary: Wrong QoS naming and obsolete defaults
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.8p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Miscellaneous
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
ReportedBy:
2003 May 31
11
[Bug 581] SFTP "ls" listings never end
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581
Summary: SFTP "ls" listings never end
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: Alpha
OS/Version: OSF/1
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: sftp-server
AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: