search for: rfc6237

...machine. > > If you dont mind the standard, you can change the schema, so headers (from, to) get indexed in body text. That can help narrowing results. > > Only problem is search through e.g. nested folders from IMAP: something like ESEARCH would be nice - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6237 > > Peter > > On 04.02.2020 09:39, Philon wrote: Hi Francis, > > next to fts-solr there was fts-lucene. But that Lucene there seems > heavily outdated why the Dovecot docs also suggest using Solr. > Elasticsearch probably is similar to Solr but the later is maintained &gt...

Hi Philon, Thanks a lot for your thoughts! Can I ask you if using Solr improved things for you? I have a mailbox with 15 years of e-mail and searching things take a long time. On 04.02.2020 09:39, Philon wrote: > Hi Francis, > > next to fts-solr there was fts-lucene. But that Lucene there seems > heavily outdated why the Dovecot docs also suggest using Solr. > Elasticsearch

...ot terms this is likely considered a small installation. We are a small team too :) and quite happy with the generous gift of dovecot, and Thunderbird BTW. > Only problem is search through e.g. nested folders from IMAP: something > like ESEARCH would be nice - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6237 PS: There is powerful client side search in some MUAs, yet sometimes serverside comes handy. -- peter

...low memory average machine. If you dont mind the standard, you can change the schema, so headers (from, to) get indexed in body text. That can help narrowing results. Only problem is search through e.g. nested folders from IMAP: something like ESEARCH would be nice - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6237 Peter > > On 04.02.2020 09:39, Philon wrote: >> Hi Francis, >> >> next to fts-solr there was fts-lucene. But that Lucene there seems >> heavily outdated why the Dovecot docs also suggest using Solr. >> Elasticsearch probably is similar to Solr but the later i...