search for: rfc5334

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > The IETF has a final draft of our RFC at > ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/authors/rfc5334.txt (yes, it goes > from 3534 to 5334 - funny!). Didn't we decide YUV4MPEG should be 8 octets as well? -r

Hi all, The IETF has a final draft of our RFC at ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/authors/rfc5334.txt (yes, it goes from 3534 to 5334 - funny!). If you have anything in need of change, speak up now. I have one question in particular: Ogg.k.ogg.k: is the kate codec parameter now down to 8 bytes? If so, it's ok, since I've already made that change. Cheers, Silvia.

...us-1.1.tar.gz ? ?> opus-1.1.tar.gz ?; gzip -d ?opus-1.1.tar.gz ?; tar -xvf ? opus-1.1.tar ?; cd ? opus-1.1 ?; ./configure ; make ?&& make check && make install ; ?ls /usr/share/doc/libogg-1.3.1 ?; fish_xiph_org.png ?index.html ?multiplex1.png ? ? ?oggstream.html ?pages.png ? ?rfc5334.txt ? ?stream.png ? ? ? white-ogg.png framing.html ? ? ? libogg ? ? ?ogg-multiplex.html ?packets.png ? ? rfc3533.txt ?skeleton.html ?vorbisword2.png ?white-xifish.png ls ? /usr/include/ogg ; config_types.h ?ogg.h ?os_types.h ?ls -lR ?/usr ?| grep ?'/ogg' ?; /usr/include/ogg: /usr/local/...

...David Flynn <davidf+nntp at woaf.net> wrote: > On 2008-08-16, Ralph Giles <giles at xiph.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >> >>> The IETF has a final draft of our RFC at >>> ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/authors/rfc5334.txt (yes, it goes >>> from 3534 to 5334 - funny!). >> >> Didn't we decide YUV4MPEG should be 8 octets as well? > > I've just noticed that the URL for the dirac spec is outdated > >> [Dirac] Dirac Group, "Dirac Specification", >>...

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Ian Malone <ibmalone at gmail.com> wrote: > 2008/8/15 Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com>: >> Hi all, >> >> The IETF has a final draft of our RFC at >> ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/authors/rfc5334.txt (yes, it goes >> from 3534 to 5334 - funny!). >> >> If you have anything in need of change, speak up now. >> >> I have one question in particular: Ogg.k.ogg.k: is the kate codec >> parameter now down to 8 bytes? If so, it's ok, since I've already made...