search for: rfc5235

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "rfc5235".

Did you mean: rfc5230
2013 Dec 14
1
Possible pigeonhole dealing with negative numerical values
Using dovecot 2.2.9 and pigeonhole 0.4.2 The system is a Xen VM running Arch Linux x86_64, presently up to date, on an XFS filesystem in an LVM2 partition. After recently updating my mail server, I found that a sieve rule I had which would check X-Spam-Score for a value over a certain number, in my case 2.5. In my most recent update, negative values would trip the rule. Here's the rule in
2010 Apr 30
1
Released Pigeonhole Sieve v0.1.16 for Dovecot v1.2.11
...any bugfixes that may still arise. The main thing that this new release adds is full support for the spamtest, spamtestplus and virustest extensions. These extensions implement a uniform means of testing the content spam/virus status headers in mail messages: http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/rfc5235/ Not many people have tested these new features yet and therefore these are currently considered experimental. Test these thoroughly before you start using them! Documentation is available in doc/spamtest-virustest.txt Changelog Sieve v0.1.16: * Finished implementation of spamtest, spamtest...
2010 Apr 30
1
Released Pigeonhole Sieve v0.1.16 for Dovecot v1.2.11
...any bugfixes that may still arise. The main thing that this new release adds is full support for the spamtest, spamtestplus and virustest extensions. These extensions implement a uniform means of testing the content spam/virus status headers in mail messages: http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/rfc5235/ Not many people have tested these new features yet and therefore these are currently considered experimental. Test these thoroughly before you start using them! Documentation is available in doc/spamtest-virustest.txt Changelog Sieve v0.1.16: * Finished implementation of spamtest, spamtest...