Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "rfc5235".
Did you mean:
rfc5230
2013 Dec 14
1
Possible pigeonhole dealing with negative numerical values
Using dovecot 2.2.9 and pigeonhole 0.4.2
The system is a Xen VM running Arch Linux x86_64, presently up to date,
on an XFS filesystem in an LVM2 partition. After recently updating my
mail server, I found that a sieve rule I had which would check
X-Spam-Score for a value over a certain number, in my case 2.5. In my
most recent update, negative values would trip the rule.
Here's the rule in
2010 Apr 30
1
Released Pigeonhole Sieve v0.1.16 for Dovecot v1.2.11
...any bugfixes that may
still arise.
The main thing that this new release adds is full support for the
spamtest, spamtestplus and virustest extensions. These extensions
implement a uniform means of testing the content spam/virus status
headers in mail messages:
http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/rfc5235/
Not many people have tested these new features yet and therefore these
are currently considered experimental. Test these thoroughly before you
start using them! Documentation is available in doc/spamtest-virustest.txt
Changelog Sieve v0.1.16:
* Finished implementation of spamtest, spamtest...
2010 Apr 30
1
Released Pigeonhole Sieve v0.1.16 for Dovecot v1.2.11
...any bugfixes that may
still arise.
The main thing that this new release adds is full support for the
spamtest, spamtestplus and virustest extensions. These extensions
implement a uniform means of testing the content spam/virus status
headers in mail messages:
http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/rfc5235/
Not many people have tested these new features yet and therefore these
are currently considered experimental. Test these thoroughly before you
start using them! Documentation is available in doc/spamtest-virustest.txt
Changelog Sieve v0.1.16:
* Finished implementation of spamtest, spamtest...