Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "rfc5231".
Did you mean:
rfc5230
2020 Jul 19
3
Sieve and handling multiple addresses
On 18 Jul 2020, at 11:23, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote:
> On 12/07/2020 22:47, @lbutlr wrote:
>> On 12 Jul 2020, at 10:17, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote:
>>> @lbutlr skrev den 2020-07-12 16:43:
>>>> I an trying to write a sieve action that will take mail that is
>>>> addressed to a user only it is filed in a mailbox
2020 Jul 19
0
Sieve and handling multiple addresses
...)
{
fileinto :create "listCC";
}
}
I get:
.active_sieve: line 55: error: unknown tagged argument ':comperator' for the address test (reported only once at first occurrence).
.active_sieve: error: validation failed.
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5231#section-6> says:
> Using the message:
>
> received: ...
> received: ...
> subject: example
> to: foo at example.com, baz at example.com
> cc: qux at example.com
>
> The test:
>
> address :count "ge" :comparator...
2020 Jul 19
1
Sieve and handling multiple addresses
...<div>
I get:
</div>
<div>
.active_sieve: line 55: error: unknown tagged argument ':comperator' for the address test (reported only once at first occurrence).
</div>
<div>
.active_sieve: error: <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5231#section-6" rel="noopener" target="_blank"></a>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
:comparator might work better.
</div>
<div class="io-ox-signature">
<pre>---
Aki Tuomi</pre>
</div>
</body>...
2013 Dec 14
1
Possible pigeonhole dealing with negative numerical values
Using dovecot 2.2.9 and pigeonhole 0.4.2
The system is a Xen VM running Arch Linux x86_64, presently up to date,
on an XFS filesystem in an LVM2 partition. After recently updating my
mail server, I found that a sieve rule I had which would check
X-Spam-Score for a value over a certain number, in my case 2.5. In my
most recent update, negative values would trip the rule.
Here's the rule in