Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "rfc4731".
Did you mean:
rfc4733
2010 Oct 17
1
Retrieving unread message count
...RFC5819 LIST-EXTENDED, but that requires
a fair bit of work. In the mean time I'm trying to speed up the existing
iteration. I've got it working using 'STATUS "mailbox" (UNSEEN)', but the
language in RFC3501 suggest that this may be slow. There is a
counterproposal to use RFC4731 ESEARCH and do 'SELECT "MAILBOX"'; 'SEARCH
RETURN (COUNT) UNSEEN'.
>From an IMAP server perspective, which do you anticipate would be faster?
>From a client perspective it seems like STATUS would be better since it
involves less round-trips to the server and less ou...
2018 Feb 13
0
"search return (min)" is very inefficient
RFC 4731: " IMAP4 Extension to SEARCH Command for Controlling
What Kind of Information Is Returned"
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4731
I do this (telnet session):
"""
a select proveedores/TUHS
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft \*)]
Flags permitted.
* 8330 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UNSEEN 6085] First unseen.
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1395814416]...