search for: rfc3501

...:57, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > On 23.05.2018 12:31, Rupert Gallagher wrote: >> Dovecot does not clear the subscription file from non-existent folders. > > Hi! > > Thank you for your bug report. Unfortunately this is not a BUG, but mandated behavior by RFC3501, see last two paragraphs in the excerpt. > > Aki Tuomi > > 6.3.6. SUBSCRIBE Command > > Arguments: mailbox > > Responses: no specific responses for this command > > Result: OK - subscribe completed > NO - subscribe failure: can't s...

...r all? > It's a capability in POP3 and an extension in (E)SMTP. I don't know about pipelining capability in IMAP (BTW, the server doesn't advertise such capability, in fact, it doesn't support any capabilities), it's standard, plain old IMAP RFC: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501#section-5.5 The whole topic is about a bad IMAP server, which doesn't properly implement pipelining (hence IMAP RFC), like others, for which dovecot implements a workaround in imapc.

...an IMAP mailbox, the client may optionally specify the INTERNALDATE: | If a date-time is specified, the internal date SHOULD be set in the | resulting message; otherwise, the internal date of the resulting | message is set to the current date and time by default. [ ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/doc/rfc/rfc3501.txt (6.3.11. APPEND Command) ] However, if the client does so, Dovecot will set the mtime of the Maildir file in question to the date specified by the client even if it's in the future. Since files with an mtime in the future can cause all sorts of trouble (e.g., they might get backed up repe...

...suppose we'll have to fix the Roundcube code where we do: // handle UNKNOWN-CTE response - RFC 3516, try again with standard BODY request if ($binary && !$found && preg_match('/^' . $key . ' NO \[UNKNOWN-CTE\]/i', $line)) { Create a ticket for this, please. In RFC3501 [PARSE] is described as "The human-readable text represents an error in parsing the [RFC-2822] header or [MIME-IMB] headers of a message in the mailbox.". So, is this really an appropriate error code for this case? -- Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak Kolab Groupware Developer...

...smart proxy, which makes it possible to use it as >> a fully featured IMAP server. > Does the dumb server advertize pipelining? > Exactly how does an IMAP server advertise pipelining other than it says it's an IMAP server? :) There is no such capability, extension etc. It's in RFC3501, which defines IMAP v4r1. Dovecot has a proxy_nopipelining setting for its IMAP proxy, I just want to use that (ie: no pipelining) with imapc too. Whether it's dynamically configurable, even with the existing proxy_nopipelining, or with an imapc_features flag, it doesn't matter for me....

I finally got my aging FC2 box retired and moved all email to my new CentOS 5 box. My site is all-IMAP, no POP3. I have one user who downloads all email to Thunderbird on his laptop so that he can work offline while away from a network connection (eg. on an airplane). I forgot to change the pop3_uidl_format setting as described here: <http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/1.0> So he was

The RFC says <http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3501.txt> this: TEXT <string> Messages that contain the specified string in the header or body of the message. But with the current hg tip (see linked rawlogs), SEARCH TEXT provides results disjoint from SEARCH FROM. I guess that's a bug? http://paulpro...

...<hyclak at math.ohiou.edu> > Actually, the more direct replacement would be Dovecot. > Cyrus can be complicated to set up and get running. I actually modified the old UW IMAP 2002 SPEC file from RHL9/FC1, and modified a few config files, to support UW IMAP 2004b. I made one with both RFC3501 (no text passwords over SSL) and non-RFC3501 (legacy, text passwords allowed over SSL). I originally released it for Fedora Core 2, e.g. (links no longer work): https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-August/msg01501.html I have updated it for UW IMAP 2004b on FC3/RHEL4. The only ki...

As RFC3501 (IMAP) say: 'A NIL hierarchy delimiter means that no hierarchy exists; the name is a "flat" name.' How to change delimiter to NIL? We have flat namespaces in our storage. Now I hardcoded this and everything is working, but maybe it is another possibility... -- Konrad

...counting the resulting UID list. Eventually I'd like to see it using RFC5819 LIST-EXTENDED, but that requires a fair bit of work. In the mean time I'm trying to speed up the existing iteration. I've got it working using 'STATUS "mailbox" (UNSEEN)', but the language in RFC3501 suggest that this may be slow. There is a counterproposal to use RFC4731 ESEARCH and do 'SELECT "MAILBOX"'; 'SEARCH RETURN (COUNT) UNSEEN'. >From an IMAP server perspective, which do you anticipate would be faster? >From a client perspective it seems like STATUS wou...

Hello, per rfc3501 7.2.2. LIST Response Contents: name attributes hierarchy delimiter name Dovecot: 2.1.16 /usr/lib/dovecot/imap -u user at domain.tld list "" "*" Most responses are correct. But some appears to not be. """ * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" {117} path/to/&...

...the root cause of the error is, that dovecot 2.2.13 closes the > connection if SSL is used in response to LOGOUT command instead of > sending usual response. When no SSL is enabled, dovecot responses to > LOGOUT command normally. [...] > According to RFC 3501 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501), LOGOUT is > any-state command, where the server MUST send response before closing > the connection: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501#section-3.4 > > => the problem is caused by dovecot 2.2.13 bug ... its behaviour is > inconsistent (LOGOUT in non-authenticated state works per...

...s? I am struggling to search for a solution to the problem given the limited information. On 18/04/2017 05:46, Michael Slusarz wrote: > You probably want to read the description of "reference name argument" to understand what is happening here. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501#section-6.3.8 > > michael > >> On April 17, 2017 at 8:33 AM Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> i am using dovecot-2.2.10-7.el7.x86_64 on >> centos-release-7-3.1611.el7.centos.x86_64. >> >> if i...

...aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > On 23.05.2018 12:31, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > > Dovecot does not clear the subscription file from non-existent folders. > > > Hi! > > Thank you for your bug report. Unfortunately this is not a BUG, but > mandated behavior by RFC3501, see last two paragraphs in the excerpt. > > Aki Tuomi > > 6.3.6. SUBSCRIBE Command > > Arguments: mailbox > > Responses: no specific responses for this command > > Result: OK - subscribe completed > NO - subscribe failure: can't s...

Dovecot does not clear the subscription file from non-existent folders. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20180523/01c4fc03/attachment.html>

...At https://drive.google.com/open?id=1j3oa5jYeSdiPbgaihq02K-u_vHbZLJZQ is fetchmail log from my sessinon with polish email provider "Wirtualna Polska" As you can se fetchmail logged "* 1 EXPUNGE" as a response to "STORE" command. According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501#section-7.4.1 EXPUNGE must not be sent as response to STORE command. Am I right that their imap server is erroneous or am I missing something? KJ -- http://stopstopnop.pl/stop_stopnop.pl_o_nas.html Lonely men seek companionship. Lonely women sit at home and wait. They never meet.

it seems that when you say "check for new mail" in apple mail, it sends a NOOP to the imap server to get the response. in uw, the conversation is something like: 25 NOOP 25 OK NOOP completed 26 NOOP * 2796 EXISTS * 7 RECENT 26 OK NOOP completed however, with dovecot, if it has already notified the client that new mail has arrived, it will look something like: * 24 EXISTS * 2 RECENT

Hi list we have a client who complains that mails from a certain sender are always put into his spamfolder. Our strong guess is that this is an issue with the webmail (Roundcube), but I need some help in understanding the output from dovecot's mailbox-debug. In order to narrow down the source of the problem we activated the mailbox-debug from Dovecot. Now we can see that the mail is moved

Hi, i am using dovecot-2.2.10-7.el7.x86_64 on centos-release-7-3.1611.el7.centos.x86_64. if i follow this tutorial https://delog.wordpress.com/2011/05/10/access-imap-server-from-the-command-line-using-openssl/ i can login to my server and successfully list the folders using tag LIST "" "*" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." INBOX tag OK List completed. no folders are

...folder name. Is this normal >> handling of special folder names ? >Yes. Well, I did try other servers and e.g. on scalix I'm getting this: * LIST (\X-DirectRef=000d7f94a4731510 \X-ModDate=20100814200222) "/" "six\"wafer" I cannot find anything relevant in RFC3501 >> Mail clients do not seem to like this response. >What clients? They're buggy then.. Well, of course, way too many clients are :( at least Thunderbird will go totally crazy when getting this kind response. (My old python scripts expecting string, not a tuple go crazy as well... :...