Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "rfc2449".
2003 Nov 02
1
[POP3] RFC2449 conformance?
RFC2449 Section 5 ("Capabilities available in the AUTHORIZATION state MUST
be announced in both states.") requires that POP3 extensions offered in
Authentication state MUST be offered in Transaction state as well, this
affects the "SASL" extension.
This is a CVS version that is a co...
2010 Mar 28
2
Improper use of IN-USE in case of a failed authentication
RFC2449 defines the IN-USE extended POP3 response code as
8.1.2. The IN-USE response code
This occurs on an -ERR response to an AUTH, APOP, or PASS
command. It indicates the authentication was successful, but
the user's maildrop is currently in use (probably by another
POP3 client).
http://ww...
2017 May 22
1
Dovecot pop3 feature
...mers are
cared by the same IT Professional...
Is it possible to send a pop3 "LOGIN-DELAY" if the customers last login
is only a few seconds away? A simple firewall rule for rate limiting is
not possible because most of them are business customers and they are
connected using NAT.
In RFC2449
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/pop3-extension-mechanism/pop3-extension-mechanism.xhtml>
I read that the pop3 capability "LOGIN-DELAY" exists. But it seems that
dovecot does not offer this? Why?
Kind regards
Markus
2004 Jul 22
0
[PATCH] POP3 CAPA command RFC violation
Hello,
looks like SASL capability reported by dovecot in response to POP3 CAPA
command doesn't conforms with rfc2449 which says:
Examples:
C: CAPA
S: +OK Capability list follows
S: TOP
S: USER
S: SASL CRAM-MD5 KERBEROS_V4
S: RESP-CODES
S: LOGIN-DELAY 900
S: PIPELINING
S: EXPIRE 60...