search for: rfc1819

Dear all We are using a definition of rules which has perfectly worked with SuSE8.2 and vmware and a local samba on some clients. The systems got an update to 9.2. Now we got a very strange problem which probably could belong to an firewall definition problem. After booting of the system the samba connection to vmware works perfect but a few hours later it isn''t possible to copy a

I have 1 NIC with an IP address of 192.168.1.10 >From my understanding, Shorewall is suppose to allow all localhost traffic by default (as long as no fw->fw rules are defined). Is this correct? Will Shorewall automatically recognize both 127.0.0.1 and 192.168.1.10 as localhost addresses or does it need to be configured? My problem is with running Apache Tomcat. When shorewall is

...ll users. It''s my first question on this list. I''ve carefully read the doc, searched the list but... I''ve three cards on my shorewall box : eth0 -> net : the evil internet (a C class network ;-) eth1 -> local : our network, a C class range eth2 -> guest : a NAT/RFC1819 network, C class, DHCP Everything works nice from the "guest" network. Surfing, pinging, all is ok, except that I can''t see the local network. The problem is with the "local" zone. From it, I can see the firewall, ping eth0 or eth1, but cannot do anything on "net...

Anyone know of a company that makes a pass through ATA? By pass through I mean have an Ethernet switch built into the ATA, like most desktop phones have. All of the dual ethernet ATA's I have seen have WAN/LAN ports, not two LAN ports. I fooled around with DMZ etc...but it just doesn't work as well. Thermal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: