Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "rewri".
Did you mean:
rewr
2010 Jun 07
0
No subject
...| (st->was_speech && st->speec=
h_prob > st->speech_prob_continue))
{
st->was_speech=3D1;
return 1;
} else
{
st->was_speech=3D0;
return 0;
}
} else {
return 1;
}
AND
case SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_VAD:
speex_warning("The VAD has been replaced by a hack pending a complete rewri=
te");
st->vad_enabled =3D (*(spx_int32_t*)ptr);
break;
As you can see, it is a hack, not supposed to be very good. Still, weird th=
at you get
this result. If you want a sample to test it, check speexenc.c file in spee=
x source code package.
I usually implement this kind of feature outs...
2010 Jun 07
0
No subject
...| (st->was_speech && st->speec=
h_prob > st->speech_prob_continue))
{
st->was_speech=3D1;
return 1;
} else
{
st->was_speech=3D0;
return 0;
}
} else {
return 1;
}
AND
case SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_VAD:
speex_warning("The VAD has been replaced by a hack pending a complete rewri=
te");
st->vad_enabled =3D (*(spx_int32_t*)ptr);
break;
As you can see, it is a hack, not supposed to be very good. Still, weird th=
at you get
this result. If you want a sample to test it, check speexenc.c file in spee=
x source code package.
I usually implement this kind of feature outs...