Displaying 20 results from an estimated 322 matches for "rewordings".
Did you mean:
recordings
2010 Apr 22
0
[LLVMdev] 2.7 release notes
> Ok, the LLVM 2.7 release notes are in near final shape. Please take a look and suggest improvements (or, better yet, just commit improvements if you have commit access):
I committed several typo fixes / rewording fixes to the release notes just now. The following paragraph under the "New Useful APIs" section needs to be reworded but I am not sure what is trying to be expressed so
2005 May 14
2
[LLVMdev] Cygwin llvm-gcc build error
Now I believe that I am getting the same error as I was getting last time I
tried to build llvm-gcc.
It may possibly be my Cygwin instillation but am not sure.
makeinfo --split-size=5000000 -I ../../../src/llvm-gcc/gcc/doc -I
../../../src/
llvm-gcc/gcc/doc/include \
-o ../../../src/llvm-gcc/gcc/doc/cpp.info
../../../src/llvm-gcc/gcc/doc/cpp.texi
' in
2008 Apr 02
5
[LLVMdev] Reference Manual Clarifications 2
Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Jon Sargeant wrote:
>> I'm attaching another round of changes. Please verify that they are correct.
>
> Applied with edits:
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080331/060556.html
>
> I figured out what your patches don't apply. Something (your web browser,
> editor, etc) is stripping
2005 May 17
0
[LLVMdev] Cygwin llvm-gcc build error
Hi Aaron,
have you got any help on this?
Henrik
>From: "Aaron Gray" Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:26:01 +0100
>
>Now I believe that I am getting the same error as I was getting last time I
>tried to build llvm-gcc.
>It may possibly be my Cygwin instillation but am not sure.
>
>
>makeinfo --split-size=5000000 -I ../../../src/llvm-gcc/gcc/doc -I
>../../../src/
2005 May 17
2
[LLVMdev] Cygwin llvm-gcc build error
>Hi Aaron,
>have you got any help on this?
Henrik,
No. This is where I was stuck some months ago.
I do not know makeinfo so was not able to proceed any thurther than
verifying the makeinfo statement did the same thing when done on the command
line.
Basically I am stuck. I do not know whether it was my Cygwin configuration
or something I have done or not done or whether it is a valid
2010 Apr 22
8
[LLVMdev] 2.7 release notes
Ok, the LLVM 2.7 release notes are in near final shape. Please take a look and suggest improvements (or, better yet, just commit improvements if you have commit access):
http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
Things still needed are marked with FIXMEs. These include:
1. Clang needs a blurb describing what's new in 2.7. Have the clang folks been doing anything for the last 6 months?
2. I
2016 Sep 29
2
[cfe-dev] improving test-suite`s FP subtests to be able to compare both exact-match outputs and more-optimized builds that may have different outputs due to FP optimizations
Dear all,
I would like some help, please, with implementing Hal`s excellent suggestion, which I have
reworded as below. Hal has confirmed a previous version of my rewording as a correct
interpretation. [I made minor changes since then, e.g. for grammar.]
[Abe wrote:]
>> I think you [Hal] are suggesting something like this:
>> 1) compile the program with FP fusion off,
2008 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Reference Manual Clarifications 2
Jon Sargeant wrote:
> Chris Lattner wrote:
>> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Jon Sargeant wrote:
>>> I'm attaching another round of changes. Please verify that they are correct.
>> Applied with edits:
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080331/060556.html
>>
>> I figured out what your patches don't apply. Something (your web
2008 Apr 19
0
[LLVMdev] Reference Manual Clarifications 2
On Apr 1, 2008, at 6:41 PM, Jon Sargeant wrote:
> Chris Lattner wrote:
>> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Jon Sargeant wrote:
>>> I'm attaching another round of changes. Please verify that they
>>> are correct.
>>
>> Applied with edits:
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080331/060556.html
>>
> Hmm, I realized that the
2016 Jul 14
3
[PATCH] : Adding dlabel option to chain.c32
On 07/14/16 05:56, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote:
>
> @Peter, Erwan, Gene, Michal, (and anyone else interested)...
>
> Although I haven't actually tested Erwan's patch, would it be
> acceptable by you (all) if I were to send a patch to this Syslinux
> Mailing List with the same code while changing the wording as I
> previously suggested in a prior email? Would it be
2013 Jan 01
2
[LLVMdev] Git-Svn commit?
On 1 January 2013 02:03, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:
> I'm not sure if this was clear from my description, but it will still
> commit each commit in `origin/master..HEAD` individually.
Not explicitly, but I assumed so. Good thing git has a powerful
squash/merge/reword interface.
This is probably another topic that it's worth mention in the docs explicitly.
--
2013 Dec 07
1
[PATCH] nv50: enable MPEG-4 for NVA3+ (VP4.0)
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> wrote:
> From: Martin Peres <martin.peres at labri.fr>
>
> This patch is a follow-up from Ilia Mirkin's enable H.264 patch which
> solves the problem that prevented MPEG-4 videos to play correctly.
>
> Tested on an nva3.
I might reword this as
"""
VP3/VP4 now work on all the
2005 Feb 21
0
[LLVMdev] Error building llvm-gcc under CygWin - makeinfo cpp.info not building
Hi,
I have been trying to make llvm-gcc under CygWin and am getting a makeinfo error.
I have tried it on the command line :-
makeinfo --split-size=5000000 --force -I /usr/src/llvm-gcc/gcc/doc -I /usr/src/llvm-gcc/gcc/doc/include -o /usr/src/llvmgcc/gcc/doc/cpp.info /usr/src/llvm-gcc/gcc/doc/cpp.texi
And get the resulting output :-
$ makeinfo --split-size=5000000 --force -I
2016 Sep 29
2
[cfe-dev] improving test-suite`s FP subtests to be able to compare both exact-match outputs and more-optimized builds that may have different outputs due to FP optimizations
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthias Braun via cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> To: "Abe Skolnik" <a.skolnik at samsung.com>
> Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 6:20:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] improving
2007 Sep 21
2
[PATCH] Apache Documentation Updates
Hello mongrelians,
I''ve had several submissions sent to me regarding the apache
documentation on the mongrel site:
http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/docs/apache.html
I have assembled quite a bit of updates and changes, but if you know
of anything that has been useful to you, or that is missing or can be
reworded or added (or missing attributes!) please let me know.
cheers,
--
Charles
2020 Jul 15
5
[PATCH v7 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Hi all,
The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
to validate VIRTIO device features.
in this respin:
1) I kept removed the ack from Jason as I reworked the patch
@Jason, the nature and goal of the patch did not really changed
please can I get back your acked-by with these changes?
2) Rewording for warning messages
Regards,
Pierre
Pierre Morel (2):
2011 Apr 09
3
New CentOS ToDo Page Required
Due to recent list traffic, it seems that we need to have a new todo
list! I propose the following
1) Nuke current todo page
2) Create new todo page
3) Clear out ancient todo items
a) Get rid of the items that are no longer relevant
b) Reword those that are
4) Update Wiki
a) Gasp as the magnitude at the job
b) Inject coffee, add ego - write mini todo and propose to list
c) Expand on b) till
2011 Apr 09
3
New CentOS ToDo Page Required
Due to recent list traffic, it seems that we need to have a new todo
list! I propose the following
1) Nuke current todo page
2) Create new todo page
3) Clear out ancient todo items
a) Get rid of the items that are no longer relevant
b) Reword those that are
4) Update Wiki
a) Gasp as the magnitude at the job
b) Inject coffee, add ego - write mini todo and propose to list
c) Expand on b) till
2005 May 19
0
[LLVMdev] Cygwin llvm-gcc build error
Hi Aaron,
which version of makeinfo are you running?
Henrik.
>No. This is where I was stuck some months ago.
>
>I do not know makeinfo so was not able to proceed any thurther than
>verifying the makeinfo statement did the same thing when done on the
>command line.
>
>Basically I am stuck. I do not know whether it was my Cygwin configuration
>or something I have done
2014 Jun 03
3
[LLVMdev] GHC, aliases, and LLVM HEAD
> It looks fairly likely llvm will accept arbitrary expressions as
> aliasees again (see thread on llvmdev), but the restrictions inherent
> from what alias are at the object level will remain, just be reworded
> a bit. For example, we will have something along the lines of "the
> aliasee expression cannot contain an undefined GlobalValue".
And this is in: r210062.
Let