Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "revnum".
Did you mean:
regnum
2011 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
...ve we made any progress on a potential git conversion? AFAIK the only
> outstanding technical issue is the monotonic revision number question.
> Personally, I have no nead for them but others have expressed
> reservation about losing them.
There are very decent solutions to the monotonic revnum issue (git
describe, hooks/tagging), so that shouldn't hold back the transition. I
suppose it's merely a manpower thing now, and the fact that Subversion
unfortunately works "well enough" for the majority of peeps.
2011 Sep 01
4
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
Have we made any progress on a potential git conversion? AFAIK the only
outstanding technical issue is the monotonic revision number question.
Personally, I have no nead for them but others have expressed
reservation about losing them.
Can we have a discussion about that to identify the core tasks currently
needing monotnic revision numbers and how they might be accomplished
under git?
2011 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
...ss on a potential git conversion? AFAIK the only
>> outstanding technical issue is the monotonic revision number question.
>> Personally, I have no nead for them but others have expressed
>> reservation about losing them.
>
> There are very decent solutions to the monotonic revnum issue (git
> describe, hooks/tagging), so that shouldn't hold back the transition.
That's what we need to have a discussion about. If those things will
work for people, great. If not, we have some stuff to figure out.
> I suppose it's merely a manpower thing now
I'm not...
2006 Oct 09
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4157] New: Add RCS keyword $Header$ to all files to support development
...seful. It can
be hard at times to figure out what the initial source rev for a file
was if the file doesn't contain that info and the user adapting the
file/patch is not the author [who might erroneously be expected to
know/remember:-] said info.
# Before
cvs diff -u will show the checked out revnum in the diff header.
However if using raw files as the work base, without cvs, the file and
all subsequent edits are devoid of original version info. There is no
reference against which to do a cvs diff -ur <rev> if cvs is later
adopted, etc. Especially if the history of the file is not known...