search for: revisions

Now that I have most everything actually working I've noticed that about every 3-4 days on average..... and at worse... Once a day my asterisk box seems to lose it's registered state with our sip provider and no longer will take any incoming calls. The caller simply hears a fast busy (reorder) If I do a reload at the command prompt all is well for another few days..... What I'm

Add support for non-integer revisions of entries, comparing them as integer when possible. --- builder/builder.ml | 9 ++++++++- builder/cache.ml | 2 +- builder/cache.mli | 6 +++--- builder/downloader.mli | 2 +- builder/index.ml | 4 ++-- builder/index.mli | 2 +- builder/index_parser.ml | 4 ++-- bu...

I'm going to try and ask this again and keep it short and as too the point as I can while still providing enough info to be of use. PLEASE advise if I am going about this wrong or asking too much. I'm seriously doing my BEST to throughly read the docs and try a bunch of things BEFORE coming here to ask and possibly annoy. If is documentation that explains thsi process in terms that

This is the patch to include SVN revision level in version number displays. There should be two enclosures; the patch itself and a new source file. common/upsversion.c. upversion.c defines a single function. upsversion(), that returns a version string for display. Some Makefile trickery ensures that this file will be recompiled whenever the project's SVN revision level has changed since it

...io rings. > > When a channel gets disabled, we have to revert to the legacy behavior > in case the next user of the device does not negotiate the revision 1 > anymore (e.g. the boot firmware uses revision 1, but the operating > system only uses the legacy mode). > > Note that revisions > 0 are still disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> > --- > hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.h | 5...

...io rings. > > When a channel gets disabled, we have to revert to the legacy behavior > in case the next user of the device does not negotiate the revision 1 > anymore (e.g. the boot firmware uses revision 1, but the operating > system only uses the legacy mode). > > Note that revisions > 0 are still disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> > --- > hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.h | 5...

...de*/ >> #endif >> >> #if LLVM_VERSION >= 25 >> // etc... >> #endif >> > > That's not precise enough. API changes are introduced in svn all the time, and > bugs are fixed (obsoleting workarounds). We currently test for 5 different trunk > revisions after 2.5. > > Though I suppose a similar technique could be used with the original version of > the patch, sed'ing out the revision nr. It'd certainly be less error-prone than > the current approach. I think you don't need to support all trunk revisions. People using tru...

Török Edwin wrote: > I think you don't need to support all trunk revisions. > People using trunk could be told to either update to a certain revision, > or stick to a released version. We don't support /all/ trunk revisions, but we don't like to force upgrades unless it's really needed so we try to at least support most recent revisions. One of the re...

I can''t get my plain text stories to show pending actions like the example addition plain text story. Any tips? (See below) http://pastie.caboo.se/119627 Nathan Sutton fowlduck at gmail.com rspec edge revision 2910 rspec_on_rails edge revision 2909 rails edge revision 8167

...I wanted to propose my plan. Full MVCC would enable Xapian to keep any database revision valid as long as any reader is using it, thus eliminating the dreaded DatabaseModifiedError and simplifying application logic. The high level idea is to use file range locking to represent locks on database revisions. Readers will acquire a shared lock on the latest revision. Writers will acquire an exclusive lock from revision 0 to the highest revision they can lock, up to but not including the latest committed version. Writers are then prevented from allocating (and hence overwriting) blocks unless they we...

Hi, I would like to propose adding the following new fields/flags to bugzilla. My goal is to make it easier to manage bug fixes and merges using automated scripts. - "Trunk Revision(s)" field This would give users a place to enter which revision(s) in trunk fixed a particular bug. This would make it easy to generate a list of bugs fixed by each release which could be included in the

...+ } + + /* Set transport revision */ + ccw->cmd_code = CCW_CMD_SET_VIRTIO_REV; + ccw->flags = 0; + ccw->count = sizeof(*rev); + ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)rev; + + vcdev->revision = VIRTIO_CCW_REV_MAX; + do { + rev->revision = vcdev->revision; + /* none of our supported revisions carry payload */ + rev->length = 0; + ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, + VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_VIRTIO_REV); + if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) { + if (vcdev->revision == 0) + /* + * The host device does not support setting + * the revision: let's operate it in legacy + * m...

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:25:20PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > Devices may support different sets of feature bits depending on which > revision they're operating at. Let's give the transport a way to > re-query the device about its features when the revision has been > changed. > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> So now we have both

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:25:20PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > Devices may support different sets of feature bits depending on which > revision they're operating at. Let's give the transport a way to > re-query the device about its features when the revision has been > changed. > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> So now we have both

Hi! There are a lot of accepted but not closed revisions in Differential. Many of them were actually committed, but without Differential revision link or when it was specified in wrong way. I think will be good idea to create script which will match committed revisions with those in Differential: file list should be same and hashes of changed line could...

...vice with byteswapping for the virtio rings. When a channel gets disabled, we have to revert to the legacy behavior in case the next user of the device does not negotiate the revision 1 anymore (e.g. the boot firmware uses revision 1, but the operating system only uses the legacy mode). Note that revisions > 0 are still disabled. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> --- hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.h | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 60...

...vice with byteswapping for the virtio rings. When a channel gets disabled, we have to revert to the legacy behavior in case the next user of the device does not negotiate the revision 1 anymore (e.g. the boot firmware uses revision 1, but the operating system only uses the legacy mode). Note that revisions > 0 are still disabled. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> --- hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.h | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 60...

...vice with byteswapping for the virtio rings. When a channel gets disabled, we have to revert to the legacy behavior in case the next user of the device does not negotiate the revision 1 anymore (e.g. the boot firmware uses revision 1, but the operating system only uses the legacy mode). Note that revisions > 0 are still disabled. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> --- hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.h | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 57 in...

...vice with byteswapping for the virtio rings. When a channel gets disabled, we have to revert to the legacy behavior in case the next user of the device does not negotiate the revision 1 anymore (e.g. the boot firmware uses revision 1, but the operating system only uses the legacy mode). Note that revisions > 0 are still disabled. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> --- hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.h | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 57 in...

Is it a bad practice to use a subversion repository to the trunk of rspec and rspec_on_rails? Or rather, is it doomed to fail, since my gem will always be out of date? I know I can''t use spec, installed from gem,s if I have the latest revision of rspec and rspec_on_rails checked into my plugins directory. But I should still be able to use it with the --drb option, correct?