search for: revealing

In trying to track down how spammers are finding my email address, it has come to my attention that past postings are being archived at http://forum.winehq.org/ which reveals mine and other posters email address. I do not know who to address this to, but hopefully one of the list maintainers will see this posting. Please stop this practice (most mail lists archives do take steps to thwart spammers

In CentOS 4 does anyone know the switches to get NMAP to reveal the MAC of the host being scanned ? I cant seem to find it and i am using nmap-4.20 - i am sure this was available somehow on older releases. thanks

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486 Summary: "PermitRootLogin no" can implicitly reveal root password Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: security Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at

xm list reveals the following information... Name Id Mem(MB) CPU State Time(s) Console Domain-0 0 315 0 r---- 2058.1 Domain-1 11 342 0 -b--- 5.2 9611 Domain-2 12 342 0 -b--- 3.9 9612 Xen seems to be working beautifully but I have not yet figured out how to get Domain-0 to ping both Domain-1 and Domain-2,

On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:00:42 +0100 Franta Hanzlík <franta at hanzlici.cz> wrote: > Yes, is no difference between '-UAdministrator' and '-U > Administrator'. But it seems, as ldbsearch in 4.9.5 is different than > 4.9.4-. (I was furious with that, because I found lot articles on > net, where -U _username_ was stated. > > My ldbsearch is from pure

All, I'm not sure how to word this question but we're noticing a lot of our asterisk boxes no longer have multiple asterisk child processes. i.e. doing a 'ps ax' reveals only 1 asterisk PID when normally I'm used to seeing 8+ .. There is no rhyme or reason to it, and we're using the safe_asterisk script which has always worked in the past. Ast 1.2.4, zap 1.2.4, naturally..

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1573 Summary: module revealed thru error msg even with "list = no" Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

I've been fighting to get the latest source of pgadmin compiled on Centos 5 64-bit. I obtained gnu-c++ (so it was happy with g++). It then complained about wxWidgets, so I obtained the source for that, compiled and installed, and ./configure for pgadmin saw wxWidgets and was happy with that. Go to make... It complains that some header file is missing. A google search reveals limited

There was a recent post to BugTraq (April 2nd) detailing a multi-platform vulnerability. An archived copy of this posting can be found at http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/317425. This vulnerability is a timing based attack on system calls that can be used to reveal whether or not a file exists without regard to permissions. The attack works based off the fact that using the open() system

Hi, I'm wondering how to explain following metrics I got from libvirt, regarding memory stats for the two GUESTS running on my host. 1) virDomainGetXMLDesc() shows these values : memmax (1024000.000000) memcurrent(1024000.000000) memmax (2048000.000000) .memcurrent(2048000.000000) 2) As values returned by virDomainMemoryStats(), I got these values :

Seems like a minor cosmetic bug with [ dovecot -n ] ssl_alt_key = </etc/pki/private/some.key.pem ssl_key =? # hidden, use -P to show it

circ.plot in CircStats under R 1.8.0 yields incorrect plots (easily compare hist() and rose.diag()). However, the code in circ.plot has not changed. Has anyone tracked this down yet?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57859 There's a method to see if an account exists or not: if it does exist, and the password fails, there's a small delay before getting the prompt again. But if it doesn't, the password prompt returns immediately. Looks like a bug... :o) -- Florin Andrei Linux Is Not "gnU linuX"

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-02-07 07:51 ------- are you using PAM? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486 cjwatson at debian.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From cjwatson at debian.org 2003-05-06 10:08

Hello! I know this must be an old topic, but I can't quite find an answer in the archive or the Howto. I would like to know if it's possible to show the user quota instead of the disk size when users open their home directoy as a share. (I think it's kind of misleading when it says "480GB free" to a user who has only 500 MB space.) Thanks! Marian

11.03.2024 17:40, spindles seven via samba: > Hi > > After seeing that Bookworm Backports has now got Samba version 4.19.5, I decided to update my samba machines. However, I find that those running on AMD64 architecture, the update doesn't appear. Machines running on arm architectures (armel & arm64) are updated correctly. I haven't changed anything in the

I''ve upgraded to Rails 1.1.2, and I''m trying to push this change through to our build server (Linux/Oracle) and we are getting some errors in the unit tests using Oracle. Looking at the data in the tests reveals a precision problem. Looking at the tables tells the whole story. My development database contains this table: SQL> describe dls_grids; Name

On 27/05/15 11.07, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > As a practical suggestion - we ran for a while with a hack where we abuse the version human readable string with a > base64 string of a _salted_ hash of the server we where trying to get to. > > Sharing both salt and hash. > > This let the server figure out the right key to present without too much ado; but without leaking all

I am running Mandrake Linux 9.2 with Shorewall 1.4, and GAIM direct connect does not work, and it did before on my hardware router. Upon connection attempts, the program reports that the connection was attempted at 0.0.0.0:5190 for any user, and then promptly fails. The syslog does report that the packets were blocked. These are my stanzas in the rules file for shorewall configuration: DNAT