search for: reuses

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Robinson, Paul <Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote: > The main motivation for turning it off is that no known consumer (debugger) > took advantage of it. > > Turning it on does more than slightly increase the object file size, it can > cause the same source line to be listed multiple times in the .debug_line > table (with different

The UDP binding logic will reuse local port numbers immediately. This causes problems for TFTP, which assumes a very low probability of a source port number being reused. The consequence is that lpxelinux.0 may end up downloading an incorrect file (e.g. attempting to download pxelinux.cfg/default but actually receiving a copy of ldlinux.c32, due to the port number having been reused). Fix by

...by how much (but I think by a > > significant amount). > > Do you mean it will re-use memory less often? Won't that just hide > the bug above? If anything, I don't want ASan to "mitigate" bugs, I > want it to make the bug trigger more often. :) > ASan's reuses it less often, but keeps it poisoned so that dangling pointers get caught. This makes it less likely that re-use will cause invalid analysis results. BUT it makes it more likely that when we access a dangling pointer, it falls into a poisoned heap area. So the net result is that it catches dangling...

The following changes since commit afd2ff9b7e1b367172f18ba7f693dfb62bdcb2dc: Linux 4.4 (2016-01-10 15:01:32 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus for you to fetch changes up to 43e361f23c49dbddf74f56ddf6cdd85c5dbff6da: checkpatch: add virt barriers (2016-01-12 20:47:08 +0200)

The following changes since commit afd2ff9b7e1b367172f18ba7f693dfb62bdcb2dc: Linux 4.4 (2016-01-10 15:01:32 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus for you to fetch changes up to 43e361f23c49dbddf74f56ddf6cdd85c5dbff6da: checkpatch: add virt barriers (2016-01-12 20:47:08 +0200)

I'm looking for a way to approximate the "zero-overhead" model of code reuse available in languages like Python, Perl, etc. I've described this idea in more detail, and the motivation for this question in an earlier post to R-help (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2016-September/442174.html). (One of the responses I got advised that I post my question here instead.) The

Dear LLVM-Mailing-List, I'm using the llvm::EngineBuilder to create an instance of the llvm::ExecutionEngine, I then JIT my code, take the addresses I need and delete the llvm::ExecutionEngine. But now I started to wonder, if I could reuse that instance for a new module again? I first tried calling llvm::EngineBuilder without setting a Module, I planned to add it later - but when I do this

Heyho, I can only provide you with a screenshot for the first problem I noticed: [https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/534012750045642783/575369402195640321/unknown.png] This code will crash when calling "eeBuilder.create". But I also looked at what happens if I do reuse the llvm::ExecutionEngine. After the call to "finalizeObject" I use "removeModule" for the

...i#165>, 1, %reg0, 0 ; srcLine 0 to %reg2559 ##### The remats identified above are all correct. Note that NO remats are defined for %reg2564 or %reg2565. Note the fold as well. This becomes important later. %reg1579 (the other operand of the ADD64mr) is also spilled with a bunch of split reuses: ##### spilling(a): %reg1579,5.85252 = [2714,2718:5)[2718,2726:4)[2726,2766:3) [2766,2926:2)[2926,2934:1)[2934,7840:0) 0 at 2934 1 at 2926-(2934) 2 at 2766-(2926) 3 at 2726-(2766) 4 at 2718-(2726) 5 at 2714-(2718) adding intervals for spills for interval: %reg1579,5.85252 = [2714,2718:5)...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6816 Summary: Delta-transfer algorithm does not reuse already transmitted identical blocks Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned

Hey, Is there any way to share?MySQL?connection between different agi's.Actually when call comes to asterisk box it executes various agi scripts sequentially. Each script checks various values by making a new?MySQL?connection and then execute query and then disconnects.? So,?Ideally?there should be one connection, and it should be reused between each agi and when a call is over it should be

Hi, Is it generally safe to cache a FunctionPassManager and reuse it on modules other than the one it was constructed with (assuming they have the same target triple)? paul -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110923/cd845b59/attachment.html>

I'm trying to implement *MUL_LOHI for my processor. My processor has mulxss (e.g.) that gives the 32 high bits of a 64 bit multiply. I tried this in ios2ISelDAGToDAG.cpp: /// Mul/Div with two results case ISD::SMUL_LOHI: case ISD::UMUL_LOHI: { SDValue Op1 = Node->getOperand(0); SDValue Op2 = Node->getOperand(1); AddToISelQueue(Op1);

Thanks. The reason I ask is because I'm looking at some code that does just that. A single FunctionPassManager is constructed with a dummy Module and createStandardFunctionPasses is called on it. The FunctionPassManager cached and run on Functions in other Modules. So far I haven't noticed any problems but I guess that is because the passes added by createStandardFunctionPasses don't

> On Feb 27, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Feb 27, 2017, at 7:27 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: >> >> >> On 02/27/2017 06:29 AM,

I'm seeing the following failures with "make check" (x86-32 linux): FAIL: test/CodeGen/X86/fold-mul-lohi.ll Failed with exit(1) at line 2 while running: llvm-as < test/CodeGen/X86/fold-mul-lohi.ll | llc -march=x86-64 | not grep lea leaq B, %rsi leaq A, %r8 leaq P, %rsi child process exited abnormally FAIL:

For eg: c=a-b is represented using the following statements in IR: %tmp = load i32, i32* %a, align 4 %tmp1 = load i32, i32* %b, align 4 %sub = sub nsw i32 %tmp, %tmp1 store i32 %sub, i32* %c, align 4 whenever there is a redundant computation of the same, say k=a-b (if the value of *a* and *b* are not changed) the code will be like this: %tmp2 = load i32, i32* %a, align 4 %tmp3 =

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 01:37:12PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > Details about this can be found here: > > https://lwn.net/Articles/750770/ > > What's new in this version > ========================== > > There are three choices based on the discussion [1] in RFC v2: > > > #1. We expose a VFIO device, so we can reuse the VFIO container/group > > based

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 01:37:12PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > Details about this can be found here: > > https://lwn.net/Articles/750770/ > > What's new in this version > ========================== > > There are three choices based on the discussion [1] in RFC v2: > > > #1. We expose a VFIO device, so we can reuse the VFIO container/group > > based

I want to replace an existing 32bit with a 64bit installation (Centos 5). There's an existing LVM with lots of partitions. Most are used for Xen guests. The system itself uses only one of them plus a separate /boot partition that is not on LVM. What's the best course of action here? Should I do the reinstall with kickstart or better manually and reuse the existing filesystem? As I