search for: reuqired

Hello, i got an error while configuring samba on solaris 5.8: lib/smbldap.c: In function `smbldap_connect_system': lib/smbldap.c:770: warning: passing arg 2 of `ldap_set_rebind_proc' from incompatible pointer type lib/smbldap.c:770: error: too few arguments to function `ldap_set_rebind_proc' make: *** [lib/smbldap.o] Error 1 As 3.0.20b is configuring without this error, are there

Here are the items removed when removing postfix: Nov 1 09:56:59 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: google-chrome-stable Nov 1 09:57:00 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: redhat-lsb-compat Nov 1 09:57:00 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: redhat-lsb Nov 1 09:57:01 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: redhat-lsb-graphics Nov 1 09:57:01 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: redhat-lsb-printing Nov 1 09:57:02 localhost

On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 05:51:32PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > On Thursday, 2 April 2020 17:30:39 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 03:21:14PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > > On Thursday, 2 April 2020 14:49:18 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > Previously we placed large files in g#get_cachedir () (usually > > > > /var/tmp).

Currently the virtio_ring structure are not declared packed, but they describe an hardware like interface. We should not allow compilers to make alignments and optimizations that can be different between the guest and host compiler. I propose to declare all structures that are in shared memory as packed. Does anybody see a problem with packed? Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger

Currently the virtio_ring structure are not declared packed, but they describe an hardware like interface. We should not allow compilers to make alignments and optimizations that can be different between the guest and host compiler. I propose to declare all structures that are in shared memory as packed. Does anybody see a problem with packed? Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger

On Monday, 6 April 2020 19:45:44 CEST Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 05:51:32PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > On Thursday, 2 April 2020 17:30:39 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 03:21:14PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 2 April 2020 14:49:18 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > >

...quot;cx"> </span><del>-// Strategy for top-level frames - these are destroyed automatically. </del><ins>+// Strategy for top-level frames - these are destroyed +// automatically. Marking is the same as for Windows, plus preservation +// of the associated MenuBar, if reuqired. </ins><span class="cx"> %define GC_MANAGE_AS_FRAME(kls) </span><span class="cx"> GC_NEVER(kls); </span><span class="cx"> // Mark any associated sizer </span><del>-%feature("markfunc") kls "GC_mark_wxWindow...

On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 03:21:14PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > On Thursday, 2 April 2020 14:49:18 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Previously we placed large files in g#get_cachedir () (usually > > /var/tmp). However the problem is this ties the libguestfs appliance > > and the virt-v2v overlay files to the same location. > > > > When virt-v2v is run in a